沃柑可溶性固形物含量高光谱检测模型的建立与优化

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2025)02-0492-09

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (14641 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract To develop a rapid measurement method of SSC in Fortunella margarita, the detection models based on hyperspectral imaging data were established and optimized by employing various preprocess and regression algorithms, and the pseudo-color distribution of SSC with storage time was analyzed. The 307 whole citrus and 227 hemisected citrus samples were involved in hyperspectral data collection and the SSC values. The effects of preprocessing, including standard normal variate (SNV), multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), Savitzky-Golay (SG) filtering, normalization (NM), first derivative (FD), standardization (SD), and wavelet transformation (WT), on the performance of the partial least squares regression (PLSR) model were compared to select the appropriate preprocessing method. Then, the detection models were established by using PLSR, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, support vector machine regression (SVR), artificial neural networks (ANN), decision trees (DT), random forest (RF) and light gradient boosting machine (Light GBM) algorithms. Furthermore, the models were optimized using genetic algorithms (GA) to select characteristic spectral wavelengths. The results indicated that for the whole citrus samples, the FD preprocessing could extract more features, and the LASSO regression model performed better than other models with 0.925 7 and 0.976 5 as the prediction determination coefficient (R²_p) and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP), respectively. For the hemisected samples, the RF model based on the spectral after SD preprocessing had higher R²_p at 0.896 3 and lower RMSEP at 1.063 0. The GA could remove 53.85% and 50.58% wavelength variables to reduce the computational complexity for the whole and hemisected sample spectral, of which the SVR model has R²_p at 0.918 9. RMSEP at 1.017 3 RF model having R²_p at 0.895 3 and RMSEP at 1.084 3 performed better than other models. The results provided a feasible solution for high-throughput, non-destructive detection of SSC of Fortunella margarita.

Key words：Fortunella margarita; Hyperspectral image; Soluble solids content; Non-destructive detection; Ensemble learning

Received: 2024-02-03 Accepted: 2024-08-29

ZTFLH:

S24

Corresponding Authors: LIU Jie E-mail: liujie@mail.hzau.edu.cn

Cite this article:

LI Wei-qi,WANG Yi-fan,YU Yue, et al. Establishment and Optimization of the Hyperspectral Detection Model for Soluble Solids Content in Fortunella Margarita[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(02): 492-500.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2025)02-0492-09 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2025/V45/I02/492

[1] DONG Jian-mei，LI Jing，LAI Xin-pu，et al（董建梅，李晶，赖新朴，等）. Non-wood Forest Research（经济林研究），2023，41（4）：142.
[2] GAO Li，LONG Yong，LI Hong-zhang，et al（高丽，龙勇，李红章，等）. Food and Fermentation Industries（食品与发酵工业），2023，49（22）：140.
[3] ZHANG Xin-xin，LI Pao，YU Mei，et al（张欣欣，李跑，余梅，等）. Food Science（食品科学），2022，43（1）：260.
[4] GUO Zhi-ming，ZHAO Chun-jiang，HUANG Wen-qian，et al（郭志明，赵春江，黄文倩，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery（农业机械学报），2015，46（7）：227.
[5] Jia B B, Wang W, Ni X Z, et al. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2020, 198: 103936.
[6] Ma T, Li X Z, Inagaki T, et al. Journal of Food Engineering, 2018, 224: 53.
[7] Xuan G T, Gao C, Shao Y Y. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2022, 272: 121016.
[8] Ma T, Xia Y, Inagaki T, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2021, 174: 111440.
[9] Teerachaichayut S, Ho H T. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2017, 133: 20.
[10] Zhang H L, Zhan B H, Pan F, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2020, 163: 111148.
[11] Li S Y, Song Q M, Liu Y J, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2023, 204: 112454.
[12] GAO Sheng，XU Jian-hua（高升，徐建华）. Food Science（食品科学），2023，44（2）：327.
[13] ZHANG Chen，ZHU Yu-jie，FENG Guo-hong（张晨, 朱玉杰, 冯国红）. Food and Fermentation Industries（食品与发酵工业），2023，49（18）：306.
[14] JIANG Xiao-gang，YAO Jin-liang，ZHU Ming-wang，et al（姜小刚，姚金良，朱明旺，等）. Laser Technology（激光技术），2023，47（5）：666.
[15] YANG Bao-hua，GAO Zhi-wei，QI Lin，et al（杨宝华，高志伟，齐麟，等）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis（光谱学与光谱分析），2021，41（11）：3559.
[16] WANG Kai-yi，YANG Sheng，GUO Cai-yun，et al（王恺怡，杨盛，郭彩云，等）. Journal of Instrumental Analysis（分析测试学报），2022，41（3）：398.
[17] ZHANG Chi，GUO Yuan，LI Ming（张驰，郭媛，黎明）. Computer Engineering and Applications（计算机工程与应用），2021，57（11）：57.
[18] WANG Dao-ming，LU Chang-hua，JIANG Wei-wei，et al（王道明，鲁昌华，蒋薇薇，等）. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation（电子测量与仪器学报），2015，29（4）：611.
[19] Cai W T, Wei R H, Xu L H, et al. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2022, 9(3): 343.
[20] Cayuela J A. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2008, 47(1): 75.
[21] Zerbini P E, Vanoli M, Rizzolo A, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2015, 101: 58.
[22] Zheng Y J, Tian S J, Xie L J. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2023, 200: 112313.
[23] Wang A C, Hu D, Xie L J. Journal of Food Engineering, 2014, 126: 126.