|
|
|
|
|
|
Canopy Hyperspectral Modeling of Leaf Area Index at Different
Expansion Stages of Phyllostachys edulis Into
Cunninghamia lanceolata Forest |
LI Cong-hui1, 2, LI Bao-yin1*, MAO Zhen-wei3, LI Lu-fei3, YU Kun-yong4, LIU Jian4, ZHONG Quan-lin1 |
1. College of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
2. College of Science and Technology, The Open University of Fujian, Fuzhou 350003, China
3. Yangjifeng National Nature Reserve Administration of Jiangxi Province, Guixi 335400, China
4. College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
|
|
|
Abstract The expansion of Phyllostachys edulis (Moso Bamboo) into Cunninghamia lanceolata (Chinese fir) forest has led to ecological and economic problems such as “forest retreat and bamboo advance” and forest rights disputes. The use of remote sensing to effectively invert the succession process of Moso bamboo is of great significance for scientific control of forest resources. To reveal the effectiveness of canopy hyperspectral inversion of leaf area index (LAI) at different expansion stages of Moso bamboo to Chinese fir forest, four types of sample squares in mixed forest, which were divided based on a percentage of Moso bamboo were set to simulate expansion stages Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ along the expansion direction. Meanwhile, to explore the applicability of LAI hyperspectral inversion models for different expansion stages of Moso bamboo to Chinese fir forest, five types of single-factor regression models were established based on the characteristic wavebands which were chosen by the correlation between the original spectra, 10 spectral transformations such as open square, logarithmic, inverse, first-order differential and second-order differential and LAI at different expansion stages, and seven LAI significantly related vegetation indices such as normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), yellowness index (YI) and so on. Multi-factor regression models were established based on the vegetation indices using four machine learning methods: neural network, decision forest regression, Bayesian linear regression, and linear regression. The results showed that the differential transform, including first-order differentiation (R′), second-order differentiation (R″), logarithmic first-order differentiation [(lgR)′] and inverse first-order differentiation [(1/R)′] of the original spectrum (R), could enrich the spectral information to characterize the expansion process better. Among the vegetation indices, YI had the highest correlation coefficient with LAI, showing high sensitivity to the expansion process, and NDVI had the best inversion effect. However, the overall inversion based on traditional vegetation index modeling was in effective. Moreover, the quadratic polynomial and power exponential regression models based on the differential transform spectra performed better in each expansion stage, while the inversion effect based on the vegetation indices was poor, and the neural network algorithm outperformed other machine learning algorithms. Traditional regression algorithms based on spectral transformations performed better than machine learning modeling methods. The model (y=5.291 4e183.76x) based on log-inverse first-order differential transform spectra fitted best in expansion stage Ⅲ with R2 of 0.735 and 0.742, RMSE of 0.733 and 0.468, and nRMSE of 14.0% and 9.9% for the modeling and validation sets, respectively. We suggest that the Moso bamboo expansion control should be selected in mixed forests of half of each species. Innovative analysis of LAI hyperspectral inversion modeling of Moso bamboo at different expansion stages will provide a basis for scientific silvicultural management.
|
Received: 2023-02-27
Accepted: 2023-11-06
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Bao-yin
E-mail: liby@fjnu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Liu E B, Ren Z X, Yao H W, et al. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2021, 31: e01856.
[2] Xiao L D, Li C, Cai Y, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 800: 149467.
[3] Mustafa A A, Derise M R, Yong W T L, et al. Plants-Basel, 2021, 10(9): 1897.
[4] Li C H, Zhong Q L, Yu K Y, et al. Forests, 2022, 13(11): 1830.
[5] Xu Q F, Liang C F, Chen J H, et al. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2019, 21: e00787.
[6] Liu F, Wang C, Wang X. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2021, 298: 108286.
[7] Mairaj D, Zheng W, Muhammad R, et al. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 820.
[8] Nie C W, Shi L, Li Z H, et al. European Journal of Agronomy, 2023, 142: 126664.
[9] Jensen J R. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. Columbia: Prentice Hall Press, 2015.
[10] HU Xiu-juan, XU Han-qiu, GUO Yan-bin, et al(胡秀娟, 徐涵秋, 郭燕滨, 等). Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 2017, 28(1): 250.
[11] Verma B, Prasad R, Srivastava P K, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 192: 106581.
[12] YAO Xiong, ZENG Qi, LIU Jian, et al(姚 雄, 曾 琪, 刘 健, 等). Journal of Forest and Environment(森林与环境学报), 2018, 38(1): 44.
[13] Bausch C W, Duke R H. Transactions of the ASAE, 1996, 39(5): 1869.
[14] Cao Z S, Cheng T, Ma X, et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017, 38(13): 3865.
[15] Gupta R K, Vijayan D, Prasad T S. Advances in Space Research, 2001, 28(1): 201.
[16] Tagliabue G, Boschetti M, Bramati G, et al. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2022, 187: 362.
[17] Pissard A, Baeten V, Dardenne P, et al. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Societe Et Environnement, 2018, 22(1): 3.
[18] Wang Z L, Chen J X, Zhang J W, et al. The Crop Journal, 2022, 10(5): 1224.
[19] De Carvalho S A, van der Putten W H, Hol W H G. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 759.
[20] Xie S G, Ding F J, Chen S G, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2022, 273: 120949.
[21] Ji S, Gu C, Xi X B, et al. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(12): 2777.
[22] Li C, Cai Y, Xiao L D, et al. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 498: 119556.
[23] SUN Min-xuan, LIU Ming, SUN Qiang-qiang, et al(孙敏轩, 刘 明, 孙强强, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2020, 36(3): 244.
[24] Adams M L, Philpot W D, Norvell W A. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1999, 20(18): 3663.
[25] Vafaei S, Fathizadeh O, Puletti N, et al. Iforest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 2021, 14(3): 278.
|
[1] |
WU Yan-hua1, ZHAO Heng-qian1, 2*, MAO Ji-hua1, JIN Qian3, 4, WANG Xue-fei3, 4, LI Mei-yu1. Study on Hyperspectral Inversion Model of Soil Heavy Metals in Typical Lead-Zinc Mining Areas[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(06): 1740-1750. |
[2] |
BAI Zong-fan1, HAN Ling1*, JIANG Xu-hai1, WU Chun-lin2. Effect of Differential Spectral Transformation on Soil Heavy
Metal Content Inversion Accuracy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(05): 1449-1456. |
[3] |
NING Jing1, 2, ZOU Bin1, 2*, TU Yu-long1, 2, ZHANG Xia3, WANG Yu-long1, 2, TIAN Rong-cai1, 2. Evaluation of Soil As Concentration Estimation Method Based on Spectral Indices[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(05): 1472-1481. |
[4] |
KONG Li-juan1,SUI Yuan-yuan2,LIU Shuang3,CHEN Li-mei1, ZHOU Li-na1, LIU Chun-hui1, JIANG Ling1, LI Song1, YU Hai-ye2*. Inversion of Physiological Information of Lettuce Polluted by Particulate Matter Based on Optimal Spectral Characteristic Variables[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(04): 1128-1135. |
[5] |
YU Guo1, 2, ZHONG Ya-feng1, FU Dong-yang2, 3, 4*, LIU Da-zhao2, 3, 4, XU Hua-bing2. Particulate Backscattering Characteristics and Remote Sensing Retrieval in the Zhanjiang Bay[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(03): 793-799. |
[6] |
LI Hu1, ZHONG Yun1, 2, FENG Ya-ting1, LIN Zhen1, ZHU Shi-jiang1, 2*. Multi-Vegetation Index Soil Moisture Inversion Model Based on UAV
Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 207-214. |
[7] |
WANG Hong-jian1, YU Hai-ye1, GAO Shan-yun1, LI Jin-quan1, LIU Guo-hong1, YU Yue1, LI Xiao-kai1, ZHANG Lei1, ZHANG Xin1, LU Ri-feng2, SUI Yuan-yuan1*. A Model for Predicting Early Spot Disease of Maize Based on Fluorescence Spectral Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3710-3718. |
[8] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[9] |
LI Si-yuan, JIAO Jian-nan, WANG Chi*. Specular Reflection Removal Method Based on Polarization Spectrum
Fusion and Its Application in Vegetation Health Monitoring[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3607-3614. |
[10] |
ZHENG Shu-yuan1, 2, HAI Yan1, 2, HE Meng-qi1, 2, WANG Jian-xiong1, 2. Construction of Vegetation Index in Visible Light Band of GF-6 Image With Higher Discrimination[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3509-3517. |
[11] |
FU Xiao-man1, 2, BAO Yu-long1, 2*, Bayaer Tubuxin1, 2, JIN Eerdemutu1, 2, BAO Yu-hai1, 2. Spectral Characteristics Analysis of Desert Steppe Vegetation Based on Field Online Multi-Angle Spectrometer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3170-3179. |
[12] |
GAO Yu1, SUN Xue-jian1*, LI Guang-hua2, ZHANG Li-fu1, QU Liang2, ZHANG Dong-hui1, CHANG Jing-jing2, DAI Xiao-ai3. Study on the Derivation of Paper Viscosity Spectral Index Based on Spectral Information Expansion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2960-2966. |
[13] |
LIU Zhao1, 2, LI Hua-peng1, CHEN Hui1, 2, ZHANG Shu-qing1*. Maize Yield Forecasting and Associated Optimum Lead Time Research Based on Temporal Remote Sensing Data and Different Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2627-2637. |
[14] |
MA Bao-dong, YANG Xiang-ru, JIANG Zi-wei, CHE De-fu. Influence and Quantitative Analysis of Coal Dust Retention on Reflectance Spectra and Vegetation Index of Leaves[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1947-1952. |
[15] |
REN Hong-rui1, 2, ZHANG Yue-qi2, HE Qi-jin3, LI Rong-ping1, ZHOU Guang-sheng4, 5*. Extraction of Pddy Rice Planting Area Based on Multi-Temporal FY-3 MERSI Remote Sensing Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1606-1611. |
|
|
|
|