|
|
|
|
|
|
| Particulate Backscattering Characteristics and Remote Sensing Retrieval in the Zhanjiang Bay |
| YU Guo1, 2, ZHONG Ya-feng1, FU Dong-yang2, 3, 4*, LIU Da-zhao2, 3, 4, XU Hua-bing2 |
1. College of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China
2. College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China
3. Marine Resources Big Data Center of South China Sea, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhanjiang), Zhanjiang 524025, China
4. Guangdong Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center of Marine Remote Sensing and Information Technology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the in-situ investigation of Zhanjiang Bay in January 2018, the in-situ remote sensing reflectance (Rrs), particulate backscattering (bbp), chlorophyll a concentration (Chl a) and inorganic suspended matter concentration (ISM) were obtained. The backscattering characteristics of particulates in Zhanjiang Bay were analyzed, and the backscattering coefficients of particulates were retrieved by remote sensing. The research results showed that the coefficients of variation (CV) of bbp in the six bands (420, 442, 470, 510, 590 and 700 nm) were between 50%～60% in surface water, and the variation range was 0.026 1～0.211 2 m-1, which also mean the complexity of optical properties in water. In order to better quantify the spectral characteristics of bbp, the power function spectral model of bbp was constructed with 510 nm as the reference band, and the slope index of the spectral model was 1.55. In the meantime, the bbp(510) had a power relationship with ISM and an exponential relationship with particulate composition (Chl a/ISM), while the determination coefficient (R2) was 0.74 and 0.62, respectively. It indicated that the first-order driving factor of particulate backscattering in the bay was mainly the concentration of inorganic suspended matter, and the second-order driving factor of particulate composition also contributed to the variation of bbp(510). In addition, in order to accurately estimate the particulate backscattering coefficient in Zhanjiang Bay, a random forest model was constructed based on in-situ remote sensing reflectance, and compared with three semi-analytical algorithms such as QAA-v6, QAA-RGB and QAA-705. The R2 of random forest model was 0.86, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 12%, the root mean square error (RMSE) was 0.02 m-1, the R2 of QAA-v6, QAA-RGB and QAA-705 was 0.63, 0.71 and 0.53, the MAPE was 186%, 117% and 243%, and the RMSE was 0.16, 0.09 and 0.18 m-1, respectively. Although the three semi-analytical algorithms also had high R2, there were significant differences between the estimated and measured values, and the MAPE and RMSE were also large. The retrieval accuracy of three semi-analytical algorithms was significantly lower than that of the random forest method, which indicated that the random forest method had great potential application when using remote sensing to retrieve the bbp in Zhanjiang Bay.
|
|
Received: 2022-08-29
Accepted: 2022-11-01
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
FU Dong-yang
E-mail: fdy163@163.com
|
|
[1] Xu J F, Bian Y C, Lyu H, et al. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2021, 14: 8577.
[2] Reynolds R A, Stramski D, Neukermans G. Limnology and Oceanography, 2016, 61(5): 1869.
[3] Gordon H R, Lewis M R, McLean S D, et al. Optics Express, 2009, 17(18): 16192.
[4] JIANG Ling-ling, DUAN Jia-hui, WANG Lin, et al(姜玲玲, 段家辉, 王 林, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(1): 156.
[5] Sun D Y, Su X P, Wang S Q, et al. Optics Express, 2019, 27(3): 3074.
[6] Balasubramanian S V, Pahlevan N, Smith B, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020, 246: 111768.
[7] Lei S H, Xu J, Li Y M, et al. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 270: 116288.
[8] D’Sa E J, Joshi I D, Liu B Q, et al. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2019, 6: 523.
[9] Lee Z, Lubac B, Werdell J, et al. International Ocean Color Group Software Report, 2014. (https://www.ioccg.org/groups/Software_OCA/QAA_v6_2014209.pdf).
[10] Pitarch J, Vanhellemont Q. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 265: 112667.
[11] Qing S, Cui T W, Lai Q, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2021, 102: 102377.
[12] Ruescas A B, Hieronymi M, Mateo-Garcia G, et al. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(5): 786.
[13] Kolluru S, Gedam S S, Inamdar A B. Computers & Geosciences, 2021, 147: 104678.
[14] TANG Jun-wu, TIAN Guo-liang, WANG Xiao-yong, et al(唐军武, 田国良, 汪小勇, 等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2004, 8(1): 37.
[15] Buiteveld H, Hakvoort J H M, Donze M. Proceedings of SPIE, 1994, 2258: 174.
[16] Fu D Y, Zhong Y F, Chen F J, et al. Sustainability, 2020, 12(3): 889.
[17] YU Guo, FU Dong-yang, ZHONG Ya-feng, et al(余 果, 付东洋, 钟雅枫, 等). Journal of Guangdong Ocean University(广东海洋大学学报), 2021, 41(1): 55.
[18] JIANG Cheng-fei, FU Dong-yang, LI Qiang, et al(蒋城飞, 付东洋, 李 强, 等). Haiyang Xuebao(海洋学报), 2016, 38(11): 20.
[19] YU Guo, ZHONG Ya-feng, FU Dong-yang, et al(余 果, 钟雅枫, 付东洋, 等). Haiyang Xuebao(海洋学报), 2022, 44(8): 31.
[20] Du C, Wang Q, Li Y, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2018, 71: 29.
[21] SONG Qing-jun, TANG Jun-wu(宋庆君，唐军武). Acta Oceanologica Scinica[海洋学报(中文版)], 2006, 28(4): 56.
[22] Neukermans G, Loisel H, Mériaux X, et al. Limnology and Oceanography, 2012, 57(1): 124.
|
| [1] |
DUAN Dan-dan1, 2, LIU Zhong-hua1*, ZHAO Chun-jiang2, 3, ZHAO Yu2, 3, WANG Fan2, 3. Estimation of Leaf and Canopy Scale Tea Polyphenol Content Based on Characteristic Spectral Parameters[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(03): 814-820. |
| [2] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
| [3] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
| [4] |
YAN Xing-guang, LI Jing*, YAN Xiao-xiao, MA Tian-yue, SU Yi-ting, SHAO Jia-hao, ZHANG Rui. A Rapid Method for Stripe Chromatic Aberration Correction in
Landsat Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3483-3491. |
| [5] |
DONG Jian-jiang1, TIAN Ye1, ZHANG Jian-xing2, LUAN Zhen-dong2*, DU Zeng-feng2*. Research on the Classification Method of Benthic Fauna Based on
Hyperspectral Data and Random Forest Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3015-3022. |
| [6] |
HUANG Hua1, LIU Ya2, KUERBANGULI·Dulikun1, ZENG Fan-lin1, MAYIRAN·Maimaiti1, AWAGULI·Maimaiti1, MAIDINUERHAN·Aizezi1, GUO Jun-xian3*. Ensemble Learning Model Incorporating Fractional Differential and
PIMP-RF Algorithm to Predict Soluble Solids Content of Apples
During Maturing Period[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3059-3066. |
| [7] |
LIU Fei1, TAN Jia-jin1*, XIE Gu-ai2, SU Jun3, YE Jian-ren1. Early Diagnosis of Pine Wilt Disease Based on Hyperspectral Data and Needle Resistivity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3280-3285. |
| [8] |
LI Quan-lun1, CHEN Zheng-guang1*, JIAO Feng2. Prediction of Oil Content in Oil Shale by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on Stacking Ensemble Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1030-1036. |
| [9] |
LIU Xin-yu1, SHAO Wen-wu2*, ZHOU Shi-rui3. Spectral Pattern Recognition of Cardiac Tissue in Electric Shock Death and Post-Mortem Electric Shock[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1126-1133. |
| [10] |
YANG Cheng-en1, SU Ling2, FENG Wei-zhi1, ZHOU Jian-yu1, WU Hai-wei1*, YUAN Yue-ming1, WANG Qi2*. Identification of Pleurotus Ostreatus From Different Producing Areas Based on Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy and Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 577-582. |
| [11] |
YAN Wen-hao1, YANG Xiao-ying1, GENG Xin1, WANG Le-shan1, LÜ Liang1, TIAN Ye1*, LI Ying1, LIN Hong2. Rapid Identification of Fish Products Using Handheld Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Combined With Random Forest[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3714-3718. |
| [12] |
GONG Sheng1, ZHU Ya-ning2, ZENG Chen-juan3, MA Xiu-ying3, PENG Cheng1, GUO Li1*. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Random Forest Algorithm: A Fast and Effective Strategy for Origin Traceability of Fuzi[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3823-3829. |
| [13] |
GAO Feng1, 2, 3, JIANG Qun-ou1, 2, 3*, XIN Zhi-ming4, XIAO Hui-jie1, 2, LÜ Ke-xin1, QIAO Zhi1. Extraction Method of Oasis Shelterbelt Systems Based on Remote-Sensing Images ——A Case Study of Dengkou County[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3896-3905. |
| [14] |
GAO Rong-hua1, 2, FENG Lu1, 2*, ZHANG Yue3, YUAN Ji-dong3, WU Hua-rui1, 2, GU Jing-qiu1, 2. Early Detection of Tomato Gray Mold Disease With Multi-Dimensional Random Forest Based on Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3226-3234. |
| [15] |
YANG Xin1, 2, YUAN Zi-ran1, 2, YE Yin1, 2*, WANG Dao-zhong1, 2, HUA Ke-ke1, 2, GUO Zhi-bin1, 2. Winter Wheat Total Nitrogen Content Estimation Based on UAV
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3269-3274. |
|
|
|
|
