紫外-可见吸收光谱结合化学计量学算法的水体总有机碳浓度快速检测

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)03-0722-09

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (5419 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Total Organic Carbon (TOC) refers to the total amount of carbon contained in suspended or dissolved organic matter in water. It represents the concentration of organic matter in water by the mass of carbon contained in a unit volume of water. Total organic carbon can reflect more comprehensively the total amount of organic pollutants in the water. Monitoring total organic carbon can promote China to achieve the goals of “carbon peaking” and “carbon neutrality”, and it also has great significant meaning to the study of China's ocean earth carbon cycle. The national standard method for measuring water quality TOC mainly adopts the high-temperature catalytic oxidation method or wet oxidation method. Although the above two methods are accurate in measurement and have a high interpretability, they have disadvantages, such as complicated test methods, long measurement time, secondary pollution, and huge workforce and material resources waste. These methods can only be completed in the laboratory, so it is impossible to realize the in-situ online measurement of TOC. Therefore, it is -greatly significant for us to study the method of rapid and in-situ monitoring of TOC in water. This paper has established a single wavelength concentration detection model for TOC standard solution based on UV absorption spectra. Duo to more complex substance content of real water samples, ACO-PLS and SPA algorithms were used to select characteristic wavelengths and the performance of different spectral pretreatment methods, including S-G smoothing, min-max normalization, Standard Normal Variation (SNV), elimination of constant offset, derivative correction, were compared. The fast detection model of real water samples based on spectral absorption was established the least squares support vector machine algorithm (LSSVM) optimized by particle swarm optimization (PSO). The experimental results show that the modeling effect of SNV algorithm pretreatment is generally better than that of other pretreatment methods when a different numbers of characteristic wavelengths are selected. Moreover, the optimal number of characteristic wavelengths is generally 50 with different preprocessing algorithms because too many or too few wavelengths will reduce the modeling accuracy. The optimal modeling parameters are the SNV preprocessing method with 50 characteristic wavelength combinations selected by the ACO-PLS algorithm. The optimal PSO-LSSVM model result shows R_c=0.984 3, RMSEC=0.457 4, R_p=0.974 5, RMSEP=0.481 1. The optimal TOC detection was successfully applied to newly collected water, demonstrating the robustness of the model. ACO-PLS can effectively select the characteristic wavelength combination. Thus, the rapid determination of TOC in water quality based on UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy can be realized with the PSO-LSSVM algorithm, which provides a fast and pollution-free measurement scheme for TOC in water and provides theoretical support for the development of TOC sensors.

Key words：TOC;UV-Vis;ACO-PLS;PSO-LSSVM

Received: 2022-10-09 Accepted: 2023-10-13

ZTFLH:

O657.3

Corresponding Authors: BI Wei-hong E-mail: bwhong@ysu.edu.cn

Cite this article:

LI Yu,BI Wei-hong,SUN Jian-cheng, et al. Rapid Detection of Total Organic Carbon Concentration in Water Using UV-Vis Absorption Spectra Combined With Chemometric Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(03): 722-730.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)03-0722-09 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2024/V44/I03/722

[1] YAN Xiao-han, WEN Wei, XIE Ying, et al(闫晓寒, 文威, 解莹, 等). Environmental Science & Technology(环境科学与技术), 2020, 43(6): 169.
[2] Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China(中华人民共和国环境保护部). HJ501—2009. Water Quality-Determination of Total Organic Carbon-Combustion Oxidation Nondispersive Infrared Absorption Method( HJ501—2009. 水质总有机碳的测定燃烧氧化-非分散红外吸收法). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press(北京：中国环境科学出版社), 2009: 12.
[3] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China(中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局). GB 17378.4—2007. The Specification for Marine Monitoring-Part 4: Seaawater Analysis( GB 17378.4—2007, 海洋监测规范第4部分：海水分析). Beijing: China Standards Press(北京：中国标准出版社), 2007: 105.
[4] ZHANG Li-chen, ZHANG Peng-liang(张立琛, 张朋亮). Electronic Technology & Software Engineering(电子技术与软件工程), 2016，(15): 137.
[5] REN Guo-xing, MA Ran, ZHANG Shu-wei, et al(任国兴, 马然, 张曙伟, 等). Ocean Technology(海洋技术), 2011, 30(3): 21.
[6] Stefánsson Andri, Gunnarsson I, Giroud N. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2007, 582(1): 69.
[7] Carré Erwan, Pérot Jean, Jauzein Vincent, et al. Water Science & Technology, 2017, 76(3): 633.
[8] Li Jingwei, Tong Yifei, Guan Li, et al. Optik, 2018, 174: 591.
[9] Guan Li, Tong Yifei, Li Jingwei, et al. RSC Advances, 2019, 9(20): 11296.
[10] HUANG Ping-jie, LI Yu-han, YU Qiao-jun, et al(黄平捷, 李宇涵, 俞巧君, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2020, 40(7): 2267.
[11] Radzevičius Algirdas, Dapkien $\dot{e}$ Midona, Sabien $\dot{e}$ Nomeda, et al. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(24): 9072.
[12] Vallet Aurélien, Moiroux Fanny, Charlier Jean-Baptiste. Proceedings of Eurokarst 2018, Besançon, Advances in the Hydrogeology of Karst and Carbonate Reservoirs, 2020, 109.
[13] Shen Fei, Yang Danting, Ying Yibin, et al. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2012, 5(2): 786.
[14] Luna Aderval S, da Silva Arnaldo P, Ferré Joan, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular & Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2013, 100: 109.
[15] YANG Rui-rui, WANG Ying(杨锐锐, 王颖). China Southern Agricultural Machinery(南方农机), 2018, 49(13): 38.
[16] GUO Zhi-ming, HUANG Wen-qian, PENG Yan-kun, et al(郭志明, 黄文倩, 彭彦昆, 等). Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry(分析化学), 2014, 42(4): 513.
[17] WU Tong-yu，WU Shao-xiong(吴桐雨, 吴少雄). Statistics & Decision(统计与决策), 2018, 34(8): 21.
[18] HU Jin-qiu, GUO Fang, ZHANG Lai-bin(胡瑾秋, 郭放, 张来斌). Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrument(电子测量与仪器学报), 2018, 32 (2): 36.