|
|
|
|
|
|
Detection of Total Organic Carbon in Surface Water Based on UV-Vis Spectroscopy |
LI Qing-bo1, BI Zhi-qi1, CUI Hou-xin2, LANG Jia-ye2, SHEN Zhong-kai2 |
1. Key Laboratory of Precision Opto-Mechatronics Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
2. Hebei Sailhero Environmental Protection Hi-Tech Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050035, China
|
|
|
Abstract Total organic carbon is an index to evaluate the organic pollution of water quality based on carbon content, which can reflect the degree of water pollution. Currently, the detection of total organic carbon in surface water mostly adopts the laboratory analysis method after field sampling. This method has the disadvantages of being time-consuming and laborious, complex operation, secondary chemical pollution, etc. UV-Vis spectroscopy has the advantages of environmental protection, simple operation and real-time on-line in-situ detection. It has a good application prospect in detecting total organic carbon in surface water. The interval partial least squares regression method based on the adaboost algorithm (Ada-iPLSR) is adopted. In this method, the total organic carbon absorption spectrum band is divided into several sub-intervals. The training sample weight is initialized. The partial least squares regression model is established in each sub-interval in turn, the weight coefficient of the prediction result of the sub-interval is calculated according to the prediction error rate of the sub-interval model, and the training sample weight of the next sub-interval is updated. Finally, the prediction results of each sub-interval model are linearly weighted to obtain the detection results of total organic carbon.43 total organic carbon standard solution samples concentrations of 25~150 mg·L-1 were prepared in the experiment. 35 total organic carbon standard samples were collected in the first period, and the spectra were divided into training and test sets. The total organic carbon detection algorithm model was established and verified. In order to evaluate the robustness of the algorithm model, the spectra of the remaining 8 standard samples were collected in another period for test verification. The experimental results show that the total organic carbon quantitative model established by Ada-iPLSR has high accuracy and robustness. The root means square errors of group verification and test verification are 1.304 and 1.533 mg·L-1 respectively, which are better than partial least squares regression and Extreme Learning Machine methods. In order to further verify the effectiveness of this method, this modeling method is used to predict the total organic carbon content of domestic sewage. The actual surface water samples were taken from the sewage at the sewage outlet of Gaocheng sewage treatment plant in Shijiazhuang, Hebei and the domestic sewage in the park of Hebei Xianhe company. After dilution, 50 surface water samples were obtained. SPXY method was used to divide them into 33 water samples in the training set and 17 water samples in the test set. In the actual water sample detection, the net signal analysis method is used for spectral pretreatment to reduce the interference of other substances in surface water on the detection of total organic carbon. The root means square error of group verification prediction is 3.26 mg·L-1, and the average absolute value percentage error is 3.46%. To sum up, the Ada-iPLSR method can quickly and accurately detect the total organic carbon in surface water, providing a method support for the on-line detection of total organic carbon in water quality.
|
Received: 2021-11-01
Accepted: 2022-01-20
|
|
|
[1] Ma R, Xie Z X, Chu D Z, et al. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2017, 82: 012086.
[2] Ohira S I, Kaneda K, Matsuzaki T, et al. Analytical Chemistry,2018, 90(11): 6461.
[3] Luo R, Ma G, Bi S, et al. Analyst, 2020, 145(6): 2197.
[4] Guo Y, Liu C, Ye R, et al. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(19): 6874.
[5] LIN Chun-wei, GUO Yong-hong, HE Jin-long(林春伟, 郭永洪, 何金龙). China Measurement & Test(中国测试),2019,45(5): 79.
[6] CHEN Ying, HE Lei, CUI Xing-ning, et al(陈 颖, 何 磊, 崔行宁, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(5): 1489.
[7] Koduri S B, Gunisetti L, Ramesh C R, et al. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, 1228: 012005.
[8] Wang J, Xue W, Shi X,et al. Sensors, 2021, 21(18): 6260.
[9] Mishra P, Woltering E, Harchioui N E. Infrared Physics and Technology, 2020, 110: 103459.
[10] Alessandro Z, Lucia M, Giuliano G,et al. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2019, 130: 36.
[11] Yang Zhenfa, Xiao Hang, Zhang Lei, et al. Analytical Methods, 2019, 11(31): 3936.
|
[1] |
WANG Yi-ru1, GAO Yang2, 3, WU Yong-gang4*, WANG Bo5*. Study of the Electronic Structure, Spectrum, and Excitation Properties of Sudan Red Ⅲ Molecule Based on the Density Functional Theory[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2426-2436. |
[2] |
ZHANG Mei-zhi1, ZHANG Ning1, 2, QIAO Cong1, XU Huang-rong2, GAO Bo2, MENG Qing-yang2, YU Wei-xing2*. High-Efficient and Accurate Testing of Egg Freshness Based on
IPLS-XGBoost Algorithm and VIS-NIR Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1711-1718. |
[3] |
LIU Mei-jun, TIAN Ning*, YU Ji*. Spectral Study on Mouse Oocyte Quality[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1376-1380. |
[4] |
CI Cheng-gang*, ZANG Jie-chao, LI Ming-fei*. DFT Study on Spectra of Mn-Carbonyl Molecular Complexes[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1434-1441. |
[5] |
CHEN Qing1, TANG Bin1, 2*, LONG Zou-rong1, 2, MIAO Jun-feng1, HUANG Zi-heng1, DAI Ruo-chen1, SHI Sheng-hui1, ZHAO Ming-fu1, ZHONG Nian-bing1. Water Quality Classification Using Convolution Neural Network Based on UV-Vis Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 731-736. |
[6] |
WANG Ren-jie1, 2, FENG Peng1*, YANG Xing3, AN Le3, HUANG Pan1, LUO Yan1, HE Peng1, TANG Bin1, 2*. A Denoising Algorithm for Ultraviolet-Visible Spectrum Based on
CEEMDAN and Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Transform[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 976-983. |
[7] |
XU Meng-lei1, 2, GAO Yu3, ZHU Lin1, HAN Xiao-xia1, ZHAO Bing1*. Improved Sensitivity of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Using Silver Nanoparticles for Indirect Glyphosate Detection Based on Ninhydrin Reaction[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 320-323. |
[8] |
LUO Heng, Andy Hsitien Shen*. Based on Color Calculation and In-Situ Element Analyze to Study the Color Origin of Purple Chalcedony[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1891-1898. |
[9] |
LI Qing-bo1, WEI Yuan1, CUI Hou-xin2, FENG Hao2, LANG Jia-ye2. Quantitative Analysis of TOC in Water Quality Based on UV-Vis Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 376-380. |
[10] |
YUE Su-wei1, 2, YAN Xiao-xu1, 2*, LIN Jia-qi1, WANG Pei-lian1, 2, LIU Jun-feng3. Spectroscopic Characteristics and Coloring Mechanism of Brown Tourmaline Under Heating Treatment[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2524-2529. |
[11] |
LIU Chuan-yang1, 2, CHAI Yi-di1, 2, XU Xian-gen3, ZHOU Jun3, LU Sen-sen3, SHEN Jian1, 2, HE Miao1, WU Jing1, 2*. Aqueous Fluorescence Fingerprint Characteristics and Discharge Source Identification of a River in Southern China[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(07): 2142-2147. |
[12] |
ZHANG Jia-lin, ZHANG Qian, PEI Jing-cheng*, HUANG Wei-zhi. Gemological and Spectroscopy Characteristics of Synthetic Blue-Green Beryl by Hydrothermal Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(07): 2258-2262. |
[13] |
MA Yan1, 2, 3, ZHAO Hang-zheng1, 2, 3, YU Min-da2, 3, CUI Jun2, 3, SHAN Guang-chun2, 3, ZHENG Yi-ming2, 3, ZHANG Ya-ru1, HE Xiao-song2, 3*. Rapid Identification of Water Body Characteristics in Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites by Spectral Parameter Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(03): 822-827. |
[14] |
QI Wei, FENG Peng*, WEI Biao, ZHENG Dong, YU Ting-ting, LIU Peng-yong. Feature Wavelength Optimization Algorithm for Water Quality COD Detection Based on Embedded Particle Swarm Optimization-Genetic Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(01): 194-200. |
[15] |
MIAO Chuang-he1,2, LÜ Yi-zhong1, 2*, YU Yue1, ZHAO Kang1. Study on Adsorption Behavior of Dissolved Organic Matter Onto Soil With Spectroscopic Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(12): 3832-3838. |
|
|
|
|