荧光高光谱结合特征波长筛选的脐橙表面农药残留快速检测

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)12-3789-08

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (5757 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In this study, fluorescence hyperspectral imaging technology identified different concentrations of chlorpyrifos and carbendazim on the surface of navel oranges. Hyperspectral images of the concentrations of chlorpyrifos at 0, 0.5, 1 and 2 mg·kg^-1 and carbendazim at 0, 1, 3 and 5 mg·kg^-1 were acquired by a hyperspectral imaging system (392~998.2 nm) excited by a xenon light source. The sample’s region of interest (ROI) was captured by ENVI software. Raw spectral data were pre-processed by a spectral pre-processing methods, including SG, SNV and FD. The interval variable iterative spatial shrinkage (iVISSA), uninformative variable elimination algorithm (UVE) and competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) were used for the primary extraction of feature wavelengths and the two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy (2D-COS) method for secondary extraction of feature wavelengths. PLS-DA and PCA-LDA model developed primaryand secondary feature wavelength extraction at different concentrations of chlorpyrifos and carbendazim residues on the surface of navel oranges. 3 methods studied the spectral pretreatment. The results showed that the model effect of SG methods was best. A total of 26 feature wavelengths were extracted by the iVISSA method for the spectral data using the SG chlorpyrifos; A total of 30 feature wavelengths were extracted by the CARS method for the spectral data using the SG method of carbendazim. The 2D-COS algorithm was used for the secondary extraction of 26 and 30 feature wavelengths, resulting in 10 and 12 feature wavelengths, respectively. Discriminant models based on spectral data of primary and secondary extraction of feature wavelengths were established to identify the samples. The results showed that the PCA-LDA model based on iVISSA-2D-COS was the best with the calibration set and prediction set discrimination rates of 98.61% and 95.83% for different concentrations of chlorpyrifos. The PCA-LDA model based on CARS-2D-COS was the best with the calibration set and prediction set discrimination rates of 97.22% and 95.83% for different concentrations of carbendazim, respectively, which were higher than the discrimination rates of full-band spectral data and once-extraction feature spectral data. In this study, secondary extraction of the optimal feature wavelengths by 2D-COS has developed discrimination models, and the results can provide some reference for rapid and non-destructive discrimination for different concentrations of pesticide residues on the surface of navel oranges.

Key words：Fluorescence hyperspectral imaging technology; Chlorpyrifos and carbendazim; Characteristic wavelength selection; Two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy; Discrimination

Received: 2021-11-25 Accepted: 2022-03-18

ZTFLH:

O657.3

Corresponding Authors: WANG Song-lei E-mail: wangsongleinxu@163.com

Cite this article:

HAO Jie,DONG Fu-jia,WANG Song-lei, et al. Rapid Detection of Pesticide Residues on Navel Oranges by Fluorescence Hyperspectral Imaging Technology Combined With Characteristic Wavelength Selection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3789-3796.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)12-3789-08 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2022/V42/I12/3789

[1] WU Song-wei, LIANG Shan-shan, TAN Qi-ling, et al(武松伟, 梁珊珊, 谭启玲, 等). Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(华中农业大学学报), 2021, 40(1): 12.
[2] LUO Chun-sheng, XUE Long, ZHUANG Hong, et al(罗春生, 薛龙, 庄宏, 等). Chinese Journal of Agricultural Mechanization(中国农机化), 2012, 51(1): 189.
[3] CHANG Bo, WANG Yan-ping, YANG Fan, et al(常波, 王艳萍, 杨帆, 等). Chemical Research and Application(化学研究与应用), 2021, 33(8): 1626.
[4] JI Hai-yan, REN Zhan-qi, RAO Zhen-hong, et al(吉海彦, 任占奇, 饶震红, 等). Journal of Luminescence(发光学报), 2018, 39(12): 1778.
[5] ZHANG Meng, JIA Shi-jie(张萌，贾世杰). Food & Machinery(食品与机械), 2021, 37(1): 99.
[6] ZHENG Jian-hong, WU Rui-mei, XIONG Jun-fei, et al(郑建鸿, 吴瑞梅, 熊俊飞, 等). Laser Magazine(激光杂志), 2016, 37(6): 57.
[7] Carvalho D G, Ranzan L, Trierweiler L F, et al. Food Chemistry, 2020, 329: 127.
[8] Aït-Kaddour A, Loudiyi M, Ferlay A, et al. Meat Science, 2018, 137: 58.
[9] Chen J, Liu M, Yuan H, et al. Poultry Science, 2021, 100(10): 101378.
[10] Catena S, Sanllorente S, Sarabia L A, et al. Microchemical Journal, 2020, 154: 104561.
[11] Bertani F R, Businaro L, Gambacorta L, et al. Food Control, 2020, 112: 107073.
[12] Sanllorente S, Rubio L, Ortiz M C, et al. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2019, 285: 240.
[13] Ni L, Zhao J, Song H, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2020, 1: 118374.
[14] Sun J, Zhou X, Mao H, et al. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2016, 9(6): 231.
[15] CHEN Ya-bin, HE Jian-guo, MA Tian-lan, et al(陈亚斌, 何建国, 马天兰, 等). Science and Technology of Food Industry(食品工业科技), 2016, 37(22): 112.
[16] Yuan R, Liu G, He J, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2021, 182: 106043.
[17] Yang R, Liu R, Dong G, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2016, 157: 50.