基于光谱结构特性的马铃薯干腐和疮痂病识别方法研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)08-2471-06

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2769 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract At present, the detection of dry rot and potato scab was completed by manual visual inspection, and the detection results were subjective. This experiment studied the spectral detection method for classification and recognition of normal, dry rot and scab of potato. 116 potato samples were collected in the experiment, and the spectrum collection range was 860~1 745 nm. After the first derivative (FD) processing, the principal component analysis (PCA) classification recognition effect was better, and FD was used as the spectral preprocessing method. The shape of the spectral curve was determined by the extreme points on the spectral curve, the midpoint between the extreme points and the slope line between the extreme points. The shape change of the spectral curve represented the change of the internal substance and had fingerprint characteristics. The mode eigenvector was composed of the spectrum corresponding to the key points or the line slope between the extreme points. The average spectra of the key points of the three samples were used to form the standard pattern feature vectors. By calculating the Mahalanobis distance between the feature vectors composed of the key points of the tested samples and the standard pattern feature vectors, the minimum Mahalanobis distance was used to determine the attribution of the samples, and the error recognition rate tested the recognition performance of the model. There were 13, 12 and 15 key points in normal, dry rot and scab samples, respectively. The pattern feature vector was composed of the reflectance corresponding to each key point, and the error recognition rate of the three types of samples was zero. By removing redundant key points and integrating them into a standard pattern feature vector, the error recognition rate of normal and scab samples was zero, that of dry rot samples was 14.3%, and all were scab samples. The feature vector data points increase the fit degree between disease samples and reduces the discrimination between two types of disease samples. Using the slope between two points at the wavelength of 911, 1 269 and 1 455 nm to form the pattern feature vector, the error recognition rate of normal and scab samples was zero, and the error recognition rate of dry rot samples was 2.4%. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and Bayesian classifier (BC) were used to build the classification model by using the scores of the first two principal components as the parameters. Different classification models were provided. The effectiveness of the classification model based on the pattern feature vector was compared and verified. The error recognition rate of the two recognition methods was zero. The experimental results show that the pattern feature vectors representing the structural features of spectral curves could be used as the classification parameters, and the distance method could be used for modeling, which had the same recognition accuracy as the standard recognition methods.

Key words：Potato; Dry rot disease; Scab disease; Hyperspectral; Pattern recognition

Received: 2021-02-24 Accepted: 2021-10-27

ZTFLH:

O657.33

Corresponding Authors: LI Min-zan E-mail: limz@cau.edu.cn

Cite this article:

LI Hong-qiang,SUN Hong,LI Min-zan. Study on Identification of Common Diseases in Potato Storage Period Based on Spectral Structure[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2471-2476.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)08-2471-06 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2022/V42/I08/2471

[1] National Standard of the People’s Republic of China(中华人民共和国国家标准). GB/T 31784—2015: 2014, Code of Practice Grading and Inspecting of Commercial Potatoes(马铃薯商品薯分级与检验规程), 2014.
[2] Philip Donald C Sanchez, Norhashila Hashim, Rosnah Shamsudin，et al. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2020, 96: 208.
[3] CHU Xiao-li, CHEN Pu, LI Jing-yan，et al(褚小立, 陈瀑, 李敬岩, 等). Journal of Instrumental Analysis(分析测试学报), 2020, 39(10): 1181.
[4] WANG Xin-ye, FENG Jie, LI Xin-ting(王鑫野, 冯洁, 李欣庭). Optical Instruments(光学仪器), 2019, 41(6): 26.
[5] ZHAO Ming-fu, LIU Zi-di, ZOU Xue，et al(赵明富, 刘自迪, 邹雪, 等). Laser Journal(激光杂志), 2016, 37(3): 20.
[6] Liang P S, Haff R P, Hua S, et al. Biosystems Engineering, 2018, 66: 161.
[7] Zhou Zhu, Zeng Songwei, Li Xiaoyu，et al. Journal of Spectroscopy, 2015, 2015: 1.
[8] WANG Li-yan, XUE He-ru, JIANG Xin-hua，et al(王丽艳, 薛河儒, 姜新华, 等). Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University·Natural Science Edition(内蒙古农业大学学报·自然科学版), 2016, 37(2): 102.
[9] SUN Jun, JIANG Shu-ying, MAO Han-ping，et al(孙俊, 蒋淑英, 毛罕平, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2016, 47(1): 234.
[10] LI Jie, LI Shang-ke, JIANG Li-wen，et al(李杰, 李尚科, 蒋立文, 等). Journal of Instrumental Analysis(分析测试学报), 2020, 39(11): 1344.
[11] ZHU Jian-wei, LIU Yu-xue, WU Chao-fan，et al(朱建伟, 刘玉学, 吴超凡, 等). Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 2020, 40(20): 7430.
[12] LI Shang-ke, DU Guo-rong, LI Pao，et al(李尚科, 杜国荣, 李跑, 等). Food Research and Development(食品研究与开发), 2020, 41(17): 144.
[13] CHENG Yu-xiao, ZHANG Ji-dong, SHAO Min，et al(程欲晓, 张继东, 邵敏, 等). Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis(Part B: Chemical Analysis)[理化检验(化学分册)], 2020, 56(6): 621.
[14] WANG Tao, BAI Tie-cheng, ZHU Cai-die，et al(王涛, 白铁成, 朱彩蝶, 等). Journal of Northwest Forestry University(西北林学院学报), 2020, 35(5): 173.