|
|
|
|
|
|
Study on Detection Method of Leaves With Various Citrus Pests and
Diseases by Hyperspectral Imaging |
WU Ye-lan1, GUAN Hui-ning1, LIAN Xiao-qin1, YU Chong-chong1, LIAO Yu2, GAO Chao1 |
1. Key Laboratory of Internet and Big Data in Light Industry, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
2. Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang 330200, China
|
|
|
Abstract Numerous kinds of diseases and insect pests affect citrus’ growth, but most of the current detection methods are for a single condition. It is important for the accurate application of pesticides in orchards and the healthy development of the citrus industry that the development of a detection method based on hyperspectral imaging and machine learning to achieve rapid and accurate detection of multiple pests and diseases on citrus leaves. Naturally onset citrus leaves in orchards were used as research objects, including normal citrus leaves (50 pieces), ulcer disease leaves (50 pieces), soot disease leaves (103 pieces), nutrient deficiency disease leaves (60 pieces), and red spider leaves (56 pieces) and herbicide damage leaves (85 pieces), hyperspectral data in the 350~1 050 nm band were collected. First-order derivation (1stDer), multivariate scattering correction (MSC) and median filtering (MF) were used to preprocess the original (Origin) hyperspectral data, principal component analysis (PCA) and competitive adaptive weighting (CARS) algorithms were used to extract characteristic wavelengths from the prepossessed hyperspectral data. Characteristic wavelengths obtained by CARS were 10, 5, 12 and 10 respectively, and the 4 sets of characteristic wavelengths obtained by PCA were all 7, ranging in the 700~760 nm band. The limit gradient boosting tree (XGBoost) was used for the full band (FS), and the support vector machine (SVM) was used for the characteristic wavelength to establish a multi-classification model of citrus diseased leaves. The classification models established by XGBoost are Origin-FS-XGBoost, 1stDer-FS-XGBoost, MSC-FS-XGBoost and MF-FS-XGBoost, and the overall classification accuracy (OA) obtained from the detection of 6 kinds of diseases and insect pests leaves was 94.32%, 93.60%, 95.98% and 96.56% respectively; the classification models established by SVM are Origin-CARS-SVM, 1stDer-CARS-SVM, MSC-CARS-SVM, MF-CARS-SVM, Origin-PCA-SVM, 1stDer-PCA-SVM, MSC-PCA-SVM and MF-PCA-SVM, model OA was 93.63%, 90.26%, 87.90%, 91.95%, 87.53%, 90.82%, 83.50% and 90.98% respectively. The experimental results demonstrate that the recognition rate of the XGBoost model with FS as input was better than the SVM model with characteristic wavelength as input. The OA of the MF-FS-XGBoost model was 96.56%, the Recall was 95.91%, and the model training time was 63 s. The overall performance was the best; the CARS-SVM modeling effect was better than PCA-SVM. After pre-processing by all three methods, the recognition rate of the CARS-SVM model was above 87%, and the recognition rate of the PCA-SVM model was above 83%. The results show that hyperspectral imaging technology combined with machine learning methods can classify and identify multiple species of citrus pests and diseases, providing a theoretical basis for rapid and non-destructive detection and control of citrus pests and diseases.
|
Received: 2021-11-29
Accepted: 2022-02-25
|
|
|
[1] YUE Xue-jun, LING Kang-jie, WANG Lin-hui, et al(岳学军,凌康杰,王林惠,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2019, 50(3): 186.
[2] Gu Q, Sheng L, Zhang T H, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 167: 105066.
[3] Zhou X, Sun J, Tian Y, et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2020, 41(6): 2263.
[4] GUO Wei, ZHU Yao-hui, WANG Hui-fang, et al(郭 伟,朱耀辉,王慧芳,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2019, 50(9): 162.
[5] De Morsier F, Borgeaud M, Gas V, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(6): 3410.
[6] Wang J, Wu W, Wang T, et al. Spectroscopy Letters, 2018, 51(9): 485.
[7] LAN Yu-bin, ZHU Zi-hao, DENG Xiao-ling, et al(兰玉彬,朱梓豪,邓小玲,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2019, 35(3): 92.
[8] DENG Xiao-ling, ZENG Guo-liang, ZHU Zi-hao, et al(邓小玲,曾国亮,朱梓豪,等). Journal of South China Agricultural University(华南农业大学学报), 2020, 41(6): 100.
[9] Abdulridha J, Batuman O, Ampatzidis Y. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(11): 1373.
[10] LIU Yan-de, XIAO Huai-chun, SUN Xu-dong, et al(刘燕德,肖怀春,孙旭东,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2016, 47(11): 231.
[11] SUN Xu-dong, LIU Yan-de, XIAO Huai-chun, et al(孙旭东,刘燕德,肖怀春,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2017, 37(2): 551.
[12] Li H D, Liang Y Z, Xu Q S, et al. Analytica Chimca Acta, 2009, 648: 77.
[13] Tian X, Fan S X, Huang W Q, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2020, 161: 111071.
[14] DU Pei-jun, XIA Jun-shi, XUE Chao-hui, et al(杜培军,夏俊士,薛朝辉,等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2016, 20(2): 236.
[15] Chen Tianqi, Guestrin C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Bossting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, 785.
|
[1] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[2] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[3] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[4] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
[5] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[6] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[7] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[8] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[9] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[10] |
DONG Jian-jiang1, TIAN Ye1, ZHANG Jian-xing2, LUAN Zhen-dong2*, DU Zeng-feng2*. Research on the Classification Method of Benthic Fauna Based on
Hyperspectral Data and Random Forest Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3015-3022. |
[11] |
LI Wen-wen1, 2, LONG Chang-jiang1, 2, 4*, LI Shan-jun1, 2, 3, 4, CHEN Hong1, 2, 4. Detection of Mixed Pesticide Residues of Prochloraz and Imazalil in
Citrus Epidermis by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3052-3058. |
[12] |
LIU Fei1, TAN Jia-jin1*, XIE Gu-ai2, SU Jun3, YE Jian-ren1. Early Diagnosis of Pine Wilt Disease Based on Hyperspectral Data and Needle Resistivity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3280-3285. |
[13] |
WEI Zi-kai, WANG Jie, ZHANG Ruo-yu, ZHANG Meng-yun*. Classification of Foreign Matter in Cotton Using Line Scan Hyperspectral Transmittance Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3230-3238. |
[14] |
SUN Bang-yong1, YU Meng-ying1, YAO Qi2*. Research on Spectral Reconstruction Method From RGB Imaging Based on Dual Attention Mechanism[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2687-2693. |
[15] |
MA Qian1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Research on Classification of Heavy Metal Pb in Honeysuckle Based on XRF and Transfer Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2729-2733. |
|
|
|
|