|
|
|
|
|
|
Research on Tea Cephaleuros Virescens Kunze Model Based on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Spectroscopy |
LIU Yan-de, LIN Xiao-dong, GAO Hai-gen, WANG Shun, GAO Xue |
School of Mechatronics & Vehicle Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Fruit Intelligent Photoelectric Detection Technology and Equipment, Nanchang 330013, China |
|
|
Abstract Tea is an important cash crop in China. The early detection and diagnosis of tea diseases will help agricultural producers to take effective protective measures in time. In order to achieve accurate discrimination of tea diseases, the spectral characteristics of tea were studied using chlorophyll fluorescence spectrum. A total of 90 samples of healthy tea leaves, 90 samples of the early stage of Cephaleuros virescens Kunze leaf disease and 90 samples of the severe stage of Cephaleuros virescens Kunze leaf disease were collected in the experiment and were accordance with the Kennard-Stone algorithm divided into the training set and prediction set according to the proportion of 3∶1 for each kind. Adopt the chlorophyll fluorescence spectrum collection system to collect the spectrum of tea leaf spot disease and normal leaves and set the collection parameters: integration time 20 ms and laser power 40 mW. The spectral response characteristics of the diseased and normal leaves were analyzed separately. In general, there are differences in the absorption intensity of the three types of leaves, and the spectrum trends are the same. There is a chlorophyll fluorescence peak near 685 and 740 nm. The difference is mainly reflected in the difference in fluorescence peak intensity. Then the polynomial smoothing(Savitzky-Golay)method was carried out for smoothing and noise reduction on the original spectral, the establishment of partial least squares discriminant model (PLS-DA), in the PLS-DA modeling set model, the number of misjudged samples is 3, the false positive rate is 3%; in the PLS-DA prediction set model, the number of false positive samples is 5, and the false positive rate is 7.1%. Then the support vector machine model established by 4 different kernel functions is compared. RBF is used as the kernel function. The SVM model established by PCA has the lowest misjudgment rate, and the accuracy rate reaches 95.72%. Finally, the model established by principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) has the best effect, and the accuracy rate reaches 98.9%. The selection of the optimal number of principal components is obtained by the leave-one-out verification method. When the first 10 principal components are selected for modeling, the cross-validation accuracy rate is the highest, reaching 98%. Through model comparison, the accuracy of the PLS-DA modeling set and prediction set is more than 90%. Among the support vector machine models built with four kernel functions, the radial basis kernel function model is the best, reaching 95.72%, the linear discriminant model (LDA) established after principal component analysis has the best effect, and the recognition rate is 98.9%. This study uses chlorophyll fluorescence spectroscopy combined with chemometrics to identify tea diseases, providing a new method for rapid and accurate prediction of tea diseases.
|
Received: 2020-07-06
Accepted: 2020-11-21
|
|
|
[1] WANG Yong-chong(王永崇) . Pesticide Market News(农药市场信息),2019,(13):66.
[2] Xie C,He Y. Sensors,2016,16(5):676.
[3] Wetterich C B,Kumar R,Sankaran S,et al. Journal of Spectroscopy, 2013, 2013: 841738.
[4] SUI Yuan-yuan,WANG Qing-yu,YU Hai-ye(隋媛媛,王庆钰,于海业). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析),2016,36(6):1779.
[5] WANG Ying-xu,SUN Ye,LI Yu-hua,et al(王迎旭, 孙 晔, 李玉花, 等). Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(南京农业大学学报),2020,43(4): 770.
[6] ZHOU Li-na,CHENG Shu-chao,YU Hai-ye,et al(周丽娜,程树朝,于海业,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报),2017,48(2):203.
[7] JING Xia,LÜ Xiao-yan,ZHANG Chao,et al(竞 霞,吕小艳,张 超,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报),2020,51(6):191.
[8] WAN Wen-bo,HUA Deng-xin,LE Jing,et al(万文博,华灯鑫,乐 静,等). Acta Physica Sinica(物理学报),2013,62(19):190601.
[9] Lang M,Siffel P,Braunov Z,et al. Plant Biology,1992,105(6):435.
[10] Dong Y, Liu X, Mei L, et al. Journal of Food Engineering,2014, 137:95.
[11] Kalaji H M,Oukarroum A,Alexandrov V,et al. Plant Physiol. Biochem.,2014,81:16.
[12] Su W,Sun D. Talanta,2016,155:347. |
[1] |
LEI Hong-jun1, YANG Guang1, PAN Hong-wei1*, WANG Yi-fei1, YI Jun2, WANG Ke-ke2, WANG Guo-hao2, TONG Wen-bin1, SHI Li-li1. Influence of Hydrochemical Ions on Three-Dimensional Fluorescence
Spectrum of Dissolved Organic Matter in the Water Environment
and the Proposed Classification Pretreatment Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 134-140. |
[2] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[3] |
GU Yi-lu1, 2,PEI Jing-cheng1, 2*,ZHANG Yu-hui1, 2,YIN Xi-yan1, 2,YU Min-da1, 2, LAI Xiao-jing1, 2. Gemological and Spectral Characterization of Yellowish Green Apatite From Mexico[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 181-187. |
[4] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[5] |
HAN Xue1, 2, LIU Hai1, 2, LIU Jia-wei3, WU Ming-kai1, 2*. Rapid Identification of Inorganic Elements in Understory Soils in
Different Regions of Guizhou Province by X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 225-229. |
[6] |
WANG Hong-jian1, YU Hai-ye1, GAO Shan-yun1, LI Jin-quan1, LIU Guo-hong1, YU Yue1, LI Xiao-kai1, ZHANG Lei1, ZHANG Xin1, LU Ri-feng2, SUI Yuan-yuan1*. A Model for Predicting Early Spot Disease of Maize Based on Fluorescence Spectral Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3710-3718. |
[7] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[8] |
SONG Yi-ming1, 2, SHEN Jian1, 2, LIU Chuan-yang1, 2, XIONG Qiu-ran1, 2, CHENG Cheng1, 2, CHAI Yi-di2, WANG Shi-feng2,WU Jing1, 2*. Fluorescence Quantum Yield and Fluorescence Lifetime of Indole, 3-Methylindole and L-Tryptophan[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3758-3762. |
[9] |
YANG Ke-li1, 2, PENG Jiao-yu1, 2, DONG Ya-ping1, 2*, LIU Xin1, 2, LI Wu1, 3, LIU Hai-ning1, 3. Spectroscopic Characterization of Dissolved Organic Matter Isolated From Solar Pond[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3775-3780. |
[10] |
HU Cai-ping1, HE Cheng-yu2, KONG Li-wei3, ZHU You-you3*, WU Bin4, ZHOU Hao-xiang3, SUN Jun2. Identification of Tea Based on Near-Infrared Spectra and Fuzzy Linear Discriminant QR Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3802-3805. |
[11] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
[12] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[13] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
[14] |
FANG Zheng, WANG Han-bo. Measurement of Plastic Film Thickness Based on X-Ray Absorption
Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3461-3468. |
[15] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
|
|
|
|