|
|
|
|
|
|
Correction the Effect of Plant Chlorophyll Fluorescence on Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Satellite Monitoring |
YE Han-han, WANG Xian-hua, LI Qin-qin, WANG Xiao-di |
Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China |
|
|
Abstract For atmospheric Carbon dioxide (CO2) satellite monitoring, high precision is the most important. However, because of the high similarity of spectra between plant chlorophyll fluorescence and atmospheric scattering effects, the atmospheric scattering effects were always misinterpreted and CO2 retrieval errors were caused. The minor radiance and high spectral similarity of the plant chlorophyll fluorescence made it hard to retrieve and correct. Considering the non-negligible effects of plant chlorophyll fluorescence on CO2 retrieval, we designed a correction method based on atmospheric scattering effects parameterization using three spectral bands of O2-Aband, 1.6 and 2.06 μm CO2 band to retrieve chlorophyll fluorescence, photonpath-length probability density function (PPDF) parameters and CO2 simultaneously. Firstly, atmospheric scattering effects were parameterized using the PPDF model to reduce its spectral similarity with the plant chlorophyll fluorescence. Secondly, the prior information database with 5 km resolution of plant chlorophyll fluorescence was built using plant chlorophyll fluorescence products from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory(OCO-2), which can strength the prior constraints on chlorophyll fluorescence retrievals and improves its retrieval precision. Through disentangling and quantifying the atmospheric scattering and plant chlorophyll fluorescence, CO2 will be retrieved more accurate. Park Falls station covered with dense plant location in 45.945°N and 90.273°W of Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) was selected for validation. CO2 retrievals of Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) without chlorophyll fluorescence correction are about 2 ppm under bias, which was corrected obviously through the method of this paper, as the largest bias reduces from 2.58 ppm to 1.49 ppm. In the same time, the standard deviations are also improved. From the validation results we can see that the effect of plant chlorophyll fluorescence on CO2 retrieval is corrected effectively.
|
Received: 2020-01-06
Accepted: 2020-04-18
|
|
|
[1] Hewitson B, Janetos A C, Carter T R,et al. Regional context. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2014, 1133.
[2] GOSAT Project Pamphlet, 6th Edition 2nd Revision, Feb. 2012, http://www.gosat.nies.go.jp/eng/GOSAT_pamphlet_en.pdf.
[3] Frankenberg C, Pollock R, Lee R A M, et al. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 2014, 7: 7641.
[4] LIU Yi, CAI Zhao-nan, YANG Dong-xu, et al(刘 毅, 蔡兆男, 杨东旭, 等). Chinese Science Bulletin(科学通报), 2013, 58(27): 2787.
[5] Houweling S, Breon F, Aben I,et al. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2004, 4: 523.
[6] Krause G, Weis E. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.,1991, 42: 313.
[7] Frankeoberg C, Butz A, Toon G C. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2011, 38:L03801.
[8] Joiner J, Guanter L, Lindstrot R, et al. Atmos. Meas. Tech.,2013, 6: 2803.
[9] Frankenberg C, O’Dell C, Guanter L, et al. Atmos. Meas. Tech.,2012, 5: 2081.
[10] JIANG Yun, YE Han-han, WANG Xian-hua, et al(蒋 芸, 叶函函, 王先华,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析),2018, 38(3): 864.
[11] Data_Quality_Statement_ACOS_v2.9,http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/acdisc/documentation/Data_Quality_Statement_ACOS_v2.9.pdf.
[12] Sergey Oshchepkov, Andrey Bril, Tatsuya Yokota, et al. Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres, 2012, 117: D12305. |
[1] |
LIN Hong-jian1, ZHAI Juan1*, LAI Wan-chang1, ZENG Chen-hao1, 2, ZHAO Zi-qi1, SHI Jie1, ZHOU Jin-ge1. Determination of Mn, Co, Ni in Ternary Cathode Materials With
Homologous Correction EDXRF Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3436-3444. |
[2] |
HUANG Meng-qiang1, KUANG Wen-jian2, 3*, LIU Xiang1, HE Liang4. Quantitative Analysis of Cotton/Polyester/Wool Blended Fiber Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3565-3570. |
[3] |
WANG Yu1, 2, ZHANG Xian-ke1, 2, TAN Tu1, WANG Gui-shi1, LIU Kun1, SUN Wan-qi3*, QIU Zi-chen4, GAO Xiao-ming1, 2. Research on Moving Observation of Typical Greenhouse Gas Sources in Hefei by Using Off-Axis Integrated Cavity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3293-3301. |
[4] |
YUAN Kai-xin, ZHUO Jin, ZHANG Qing-hua, LI Ya-guo*. Study on the Spectral and Laser Damage Resistance of CO2 Laser Modified Sol-Gel SiO2 Thin Films[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1752-1759. |
[5] |
WANG Shu-ying*, YOU De-chang, MA Wen-jia, YANG Ruo-fan, ZHANG Yang-zhi, YU Zi-lei, ZHAO Xiao-fang, SHEN Yi-fan. Experimental Collisional Energy Transfer Distributions for Collisions of CO2 With Highly Vibrationally Excited Na2[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1760-1764. |
[6] |
CHAI Shu1, PENG Hai-meng1, WU Wen-dong1, 2*. Acoustic-Based Spectral Correction Method for Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy in High Temperature Environment[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1401-1407. |
[7] |
JIANG Jun1, 2, YAO Zhi-gang1, 2*. Dynamic Detection and Correction for Abnormal Response of CCD Pixels in Spaceborne Low-Light Imager[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1175-1182. |
[8] |
WANG Mei-li1, 2, SHI Guang-hai2*, ZHANG Xiao-hui1, YANG Ze-yu2, 3, XING Ying-mei1. Experimental Study on High-Temperature Phase Transformation of Calcite[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1205-1211. |
[9] |
ZHANG Le-wen1, 2, WANG Qian-jin1, 3, SUN Peng-shuai1, PANG Tao1, WU Bian1, XIA Hua1, ZHANG Zhi-rong1, 3, 4, 5*. Analysis of Interference Factors and Study of Temperature Correction Method in Gas Detection by Laser Absorption Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 767-773. |
[10] |
HU Xiao-yun1, BIAN Xi-hui1, 2, 3*, XIANG Yang2, ZHANG Huan1, WEI Jun-fu1. Quantitative Analysis of Single Component Oils in Quinary Blend Oil by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Chemometrics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 78-84. |
[11] |
ZHU Chen-guang1, LIU Ya-jun2, LI Xin-xing1, 3, GONG Wei-wei4*, GUO Wei1. Detection Method of Freshness of Penaeus Vannamei Based on
Hyperspectral[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 107-110. |
[12] |
CHEN Yong1, 2, GUO Yun-zhu1, WANG Wei3*, WU Xiao-hong1, 2*, JIA Hong-wen4, WU Bin4. Clustering Analysis of FTIR Spectra Using Fuzzy K-Harmonic-Kohonen Clustering Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 268-272. |
[13] |
LIAN Xiao-qin1, 2, CHEN Yan-ming1, 2, WANG Yu-qiao1, 2, LIU Yu1, 2. Research on ICP-AES Spectral Baseline Correction Method Based on DE Algorithm and NURBS Curve[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 260-267. |
[14] |
CHEN Su-yi, LI Hao-ran, DAI Ji-sheng*. Baseline Correction Method Based on Block Sparse Signal Recovery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3730-3735. |
[15] |
HE Nian, SHAN Peng*, HE Zhong-hai, WANG Qiao-yun, LI Zhi-gang, WU Zhui. Study on the Fractional Baseline Correction Method of ATR-FTIR
Spectral Signal in the Fermentation Process of Sodium Glutamate[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1848-1854. |
|
|
|
|