|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals Based on LSSVM |
LIN Xiao-mei1, HUANG Yu-tao1, LIN Jing-jun2*, TAO Si-yu1, CHE Chang-jin1 |
1. College of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China
2. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to improve the accuracy of soil quantitative analysis, the partial least squares (PLS) and least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) were combined with laser-induced plasma technology to analyze the Cu elements in the soil. Two characteristic lines of Cu Ⅰ 324.75 nm and Cu Ⅰ 327.40 nm were compared and analyzed, and Cu Ⅰ 324.75 nm was selected as the analytical line. Firstly, the experimental parameters were optimized. The relationship between laser energy, acquisition delay time and signal-to-noise ratio were compared. The optimal energy and optimal acquisition delay time were 90 mJ and 1 000 ns, respectively. Then, the characteristic spectra of five different concentrations of samples were collected under the optimal experimental conditions. The calibration model was established by standard internal method, PLS and LSSVM. By comparing the fitting coefficient, root mean square error and average relative error of the three models, the calibration model of the standard internal method had poor performance due to the influence of soil matrix effect and self-absorption effect. And the fitting degree did not meet the experimental requirements. The values of the root mean square error and the average relative error were too large to meet the accuracy and stability requirements of the experiment. The calibration model was calibrated with PLS. Compared with the standard internal method, the accuracy and stability of the calibration model were significantly improved. R2 was increased from 0.870 1 to 0.985 1. The root mean square error of the training set and the root mean square error of the prediction set were reduced to the order of 0.1 Wt%. But the decrease of the average relative error with PLS model can’t meet the experimental requirement. It indicated that PLS could improve the accuracy of the calibration model rather than the stability of the calibration model. The matrix effect and self-absorption effect of soil cannot be reduced. Compared with the former calibration models, the LSSVM calibration model has better accuracy and stability. The R2 increased to 0.997 6. The data points in the model were basically distributed on the fitted curve with good linear correlation. Compared with the standard internal method, the root mean square error of the LSSVM training set decreased from 3.448 8 Wt% to 0.018 7 Wt%. The root mean square error of the prediction set decreased from 1.280 7 Wt% to 0.149 1 Wt%. The average relative error reduced by 6.24 times. Compared with the PLS calibration model, the parameters of the LSSVM calibration model were greatly reduced. The average relative error reduced from 7.455 6% to 2.137%, which can meet the stability requirements. It shows that the LSSVM algorithm has advantages for improving the accuracy and stability of the calibration model. It can reduce the matrix effects and the self-absorption effects of soil.
|
Received: 2019-04-17
Accepted: 2019-08-20
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIN Jing-jun
E-mail: 1124270941@qq.com
|
|
[1] DU Chuang, GAO Xun, SHAO Yan, et al(杜 闯, 高 勋, 邵 妍, 等). Acta Physica Sinica(物理学报), 2013, 62(4): 221.
[2] Guo L B, Zhu Z H, Li J M, et al. Optics Express, 2018, 26(3): 2634.
[3] Zhang G Y, Song H, Liu Y, et al. Optik, 2018, 165(5): 87.
[4] Ramli M, Khumaeni A, Kurniawan K H, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2017, 132(6): 8.
[5] Ferreira E C, Milori D, Ferreira E J, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2008, 63(10): 1216.
[6] Li K X, Zhou W D, Shen Q M, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2010, 25(9): 1475.
[7] GU Yan-hong, ZHAO Nan-jing, MA Ming-jun, et al(谷艳红, 赵南京, 马明俊, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2018, 38(3): 982.
[8] Shakeel H, Haq S U, Abbas Q, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2018, 146(8): 101.
[9] Lin J J, Lin X M, Guo L B, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2018, 33(7): 1545.
[10] Jiang H, Dong L, J Benchi, et al. Journal of Applied Spectroscopy, 2017, 84(1): 103.
[11] Guo Y M, Deng L M, Yang X Y, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2017, 32(12): 2401.
[12] Robledo M A, Sobral H, Garcia V A. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2018, 144(6): 7.
[13] Lepore K H, Fassett C I, Breves E A, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2017, 71(4): 1. |
[1] |
XU Tian1, 2, LI Jing1, 2, LIU Zhen-hua1, 2*. Remote Sensing Inversion of Soil Manganese in Nanchuan District, Chongqing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 69-75. |
[2] |
LI Yu1, ZHANG Ke-can1, PENG Li-juan2*, ZHU Zheng-liang1, HE Liang1*. Simultaneous Detection of Glucose and Xylose in Tobacco by Using Partial Least Squares Assisted UV-Vis Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 103-110. |
[3] |
LI Hu1, ZHONG Yun1, 2, FENG Ya-ting1, LIN Zhen1, ZHU Shi-jiang1, 2*. Multi-Vegetation Index Soil Moisture Inversion Model Based on UAV
Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 207-214. |
[4] |
HAN Xue1, 2, LIU Hai1, 2, LIU Jia-wei3, WU Ming-kai1, 2*. Rapid Identification of Inorganic Elements in Understory Soils in
Different Regions of Guizhou Province by X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 225-229. |
[5] |
MENG Shan1, 2, LI Xin-guo1, 2*. Estimation of Surface Soil Organic Carbon Content in Lakeside Oasis Based on Hyperspectral Wavelet Energy Feature Vector[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3853-3861. |
[6] |
LI Qi-chen1, 2, LI Min-zan1, 2*, YANG Wei2, 3, SUN Hong2, 3, ZHANG Yao1, 3. Quantitative Analysis of Water-Soluble Phosphorous Based on Raman
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3871-3876. |
[7] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[8] |
LIU Hao-dong1, 2, JIANG Xi-quan1, 2, NIU Hao1, 2, LIU Yu-bo1, LI Hui2, LIU Yuan2, Wei Zhang2, LI Lu-yan1, CHEN Ting1,ZHAO Yan-jie1*,NI Jia-sheng2*. Quantitative Analysis of Ethanol Based on Laser Raman Spectroscopy Normalization Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3820-3825. |
[9] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[10] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[11] |
JIA Hao1, 3, 4, ZHANG Wei-fang1, 3, LEI Jing-wei1, 3*, LI Ying-ying1, 3, YANG Chun-jing2, 3*, XIE Cai-xia1, 3, GONG Hai-yan1, 3, DING Xin-yu1, YAO Tian-yi1. Study on Infrared Fingerprint of the Classical Famous
Prescription Yiguanjian[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3202-3210. |
[12] |
LIU Fei1, TAN Jia-jin1*, XIE Gu-ai2, SU Jun3, YE Jian-ren1. Early Diagnosis of Pine Wilt Disease Based on Hyperspectral Data and Needle Resistivity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3280-3285. |
[13] |
AN Bai-song1, 2, WANG Xue-mei1, 2*, HUANG Xiao-yu1, 2, KAWUQIATI Bai-shan1, 2. Hyperspectral Estimation of Soil Lead Content Based on Random Frog Band Selection Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3302-3309. |
[14] |
DENG Yun1, 2, NIU Zhao-wen1, 2, FENG Qi-yao1, 2, WANG Yu1, 2*. A Novel Hyperspectral Prediction Model of Organic Matter in Red Soil Based on Improved Temporal Convolutional Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2942-2951. |
[15] |
CAI Hai-hui1, ZHOU Ling2, SHI Zhou3, JI Wen-jun4, LUO De-fang1, PENG Jie1, FENG Chun-hui5*. Hyperspectral Inversion of Soil Organic Matter in Jujube Orchard
in Southern Xinjiang Using CARS-BPNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2568-2573. |
|
|
|
|