|
|
|
|
|
|
Design and Application of Reflectance Measurement System for Sea Bottom in Optically Shallow Water |
ZENG Kai1, 2, 3, XU Zhan-tang1, 2*, YANG Yue-zhong1, 2, ZHANG Yu1, 2, 3, ZHOU Wen1, 2, LI Cai1, HUANG Hui4 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, Guangdong Key Lab of Ocean Remote Sensing, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
2. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Guangzhou 511458, China
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4. National Experiment Station of Tropical Marine Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya 572000, China |
|
|
Abstract The spectral reflectance of the sea bottom plays an important role in radiative transfer signal of optically shallow water, affecting the spectral characteristics of water-leaving radiance in sea surface. Therefore, the precise information of the substrate is particularly significant in the study of the coastal remote sensing. In order to provide an accurate and convenient on-site information extraction of optically shallow water bottom, a set of sea bottom reflectance measurement system was designed, which is characterized by designing a reference whiteboard that can be freely stretched and rotated in order to eliminate the influence of the absorption attenuation of water between the probe and the target. And the design of the dual optical path for simultaneous measurement solved the interference of the spatial and temporal variability of water optical properties. Optical in-situ bottom reflectance of various substrates include corals, seagrass, sediment and beach collected in Sanya Coral Reefs Reserve during September 3—8, 2018 were used to study the feasibility of the system. As expected, the various types of substrate have distinct spectral separability. The spectral reflectance feature of the sand bottom and onshore beach are different over the range 580~700 nm, which suggests that the absorption and scattering of water and the presence of microalgae strongly affect the measurement of under water radiation. The difference between seagrass and coral is obvious that there is positive reflectance feature at 540~600 nm of seagrass, whereas the typical characteristic of coral is that there are three positive features around 575, 600 and 650 nm. In addition, the three carbonate substrates of coral, sand bottom and sandy beach have reflection peaks at 395, 430, 490 and 520 nm, and a small absorption peak at 485 and 585 nm, while seagrass has an absorption peak at 395, 430, 490 and 520 nm, a reflection peak at 485 and 585 nm. The above data results laid the foundation for the future extraction of benthic composition information, and also confirmed the reliability and real validity of the system design.
|
Received: 2018-12-25
Accepted: 2019-04-29
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
XU Zhan-tang
E-mail: xuzhantang@qq.com
|
|
[1] Kazama Y, Yamamoto T. Proc SPIE, 2017, 10422: 1042208(doi: org/10.1117/12.2280305).
[2] McKinna L I W, Fearns P R C, Weeks S J, et al. J. Geophys. Res-Oceans., 2015, 120: 1741.
[3] Lee Z P, Carder K L, Mobley C D, et al. Appl. Optics, 1999, 38: 3831.
[4] Purkis S J. Annual Review of Marine Sciences, 2018, 10(1): 149.
[5] Bostater C R, Rotkiske T, Oney T. Remote Sensing of the Ocean, Sea Ice, Coastal Waters, and Large Water Regions,2016. Vol. 9999. Bellingham: Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering,2016.
[6] Jay S, Guillaume M, Minghelli A, et al. Remote Sens. Environ.,2017; 200: 352.
[7] Miyazaki T, Harashima A. Measuring the Spectral Signatures of Coral Reefs, IGARSS, 1993. 693.
[8] Hochberg E J, Atkinson M J. Coral Reefs.,2000,19: 164.
[9] Holden H, LeDrew E. Remote Sens. Environ.,1998; 65: 217.
[10] Idris M S, Jean K S, Zakariya R. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management,2009,4: 36.
[11] Nurdin N. Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering,2012,158: 182.
[12] Chen Q, Deng R, Qin Y, et al. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35: 3394.
[13] CHEN Biao, CHEN Yong-qiang, HUANG Hui, et al(陈 标, 陈永强, 黄 晖, 等). Journal of Tropical Oceanography(热带海洋学报),2015,34(1): 71.
[14] Yang C Y, Yang D T. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens., 2015, 8: 1266.
[15] Fearns P R C, Klonowski W, Babcock R C, et al. Continental Shelf Research,2011,31: 1249.
[16] Maritorena S, Morel A, Gentili B. Limnol. Oceanogr.,1994,39: 1689.
[17] Xu Zhantang, Yang Yuezhong, Wang Guifeng, et al. J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans., 2012, 117: 14.
[18] Panigrahy S, Kumar T, Manjunath K R. Wetl. Ecol. Manag., 2012, 20: 101.
[19] WANG Xiao-yong, TANG Jun-wu, LI Tong-ji, et al(汪小勇, 唐军武, 李铜基, 等). Ocean Technology(海洋技术),2012,31(1): 72.
[20] Kobryn H T, Wouters K, Beckley L E, et al. Plos One,2013,8: 22.
[21] Torres-Perez J L, Guild L S, Armstrong R A. Remote Sensing,2012,4: 3813.
[22] Nurdin N, Komatsu T, Yamano H, et al. Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering,2012,8525: 85251A-A-10.
[23] Garcia R A, Lee Z, Hochberg E J. Remote Sensing,2018,10: 25. |
[1] |
LIANG Ye-heng1, DENG Ru-ru1, 2*, LIANG Yu-jie1, LIU Yong-ming3, WU Yi4, YUAN Yu-heng5, AI Xian-jun6. Spectral Characteristics of Sediment Reflectance Under the Background of Heavy Metal Polluted Water and Analysis of Its Contribution to
Water-Leaving Reflectance[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 111-117. |
[2] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[3] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[4] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[5] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[6] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[7] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[8] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[9] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[10] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[11] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[12] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
[13] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[14] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[15] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
|
|
|
|