|
|
|
|
|
|
| NIR Quantitative Model Establishment of Cotton-Polyester Blend Fabrics and Related Problem Exploration |
| SHI Yao1, LI Wen-xia1*, ZHAO Guo-liang1, LI Shu-run2, WANG Hua-ping3, ZHANG Shuo4 |
1. School of Material Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology, Beijing 100029, China
2. Jinghuan Textile Recycling Handan Co., Ltd., Handan 056800, China
3. College of Material Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
4. Zhejiang Green Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Shaoxing 312000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In waste textile recycling, the rapid and accurate determination of fiber type and content is a key part of the recovery program. In this paper, 598 waste cotton-polyester blended fabrics were used as the research object, and the raw near infrared spectra (NIRS) of the samples were tested by portable NIR spectrometer. In the 1 400~1 700 and 1 900~2 200 nm NIR regions, there was a clear difference between the spectra of 100% cotton and 100% polyester samples, and these spectral differences were reflected in the various color fibers. At the same time, the reason why the slant spectrum was produced might be surface effect of the fabric, the coloring method and the fine particles adhered to the fiber surface. Dark samples tended to drift their spectral baselines in the shortwave region. After the derivative pretreatment, the baseline drift was basically eliminated, and the oblique spectrum showed normal spectral characteristics. The quantitative analysis model of waste cotton-polyester blend fabric was established by partial least squares (PLS) method combined with 1st derivative, Savitzky-Golay (S-G) smoothing, mean centering and orthogonal signal correction (OSC) method. In order to verify the reliability of the model, root mean standard error of cross validation (RMSECV) was calculated and 346 external samples were selected to test the model. The RMSECV of the model was 0.002, and the relational coefficient of calibration ( RC ) was 0.998, and the relational coefficient of prediction ( RP ) was 0.997, and the standard error of prediction (SEP) was 1.121, and the prediction accuracy of the model was up to 97%. The error of NIR predictive value and gravimetric determination was within ±3%, and the consistency between the two is more than 90% , while the error was within ±5%, and the consistency was above 95%, and the analysis time of each sample was less than 10 seconds. Therefore, the waste cotton-polyester blend fabric fiber content could be quickly and accurately predicted by using NIR technology combined with the model.
|
|
Received: 2016-09-05
Accepted: 2017-02-16
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Wen-xia
E-mail: liwenxia307@163.com
|
|
[1] Xing Shengyuan, Zhou Shuo, Cao Xiaohong. Application Handbook of Textile Fiber and Product Identification. Beijing：Chemical Industry Press, 2016. 20.
[2] Durand A, Devos O, Ruckebusch C, et al. J. Analytica Chimical Acta, 2007, 595(1-2): 72.
[3] Wu G F, He Y. Western Psychologist, 2010, 30(2): 331.
[4] Ruckbusch C, Orhan F, Durand A, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2006, 60(5): 539.
[5] Rodgers J, Beck K. Rapid Determination by NIR of the Cotton Content of Blend Fabrics after Dyeing, 2005 Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA，2005.
[6] Geng Xiang, Gui Jiaxiang, Yao Lei，et al. Shanghai Textile Science and Technology, 2013. 25.
[7] Rodgers, James, Beck, et al. Textile Research Journal, 2009，79: 8.
[8] Yan Yanlu, Chen Bin, Zhu Dazhou. Principle, Technology and Application of NIR Spectroscopy. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2013, 99.
[9] GB/T2910.11—2009, The Mixture of Cellulose Fibers and Polyester Fibers (Sulfuric Acid Method). National Standards of the People’s Republic of China. National Standards of the People’s Republic of China.
[10] Burns D. Book of Papers, ACS Short Course, New Orleans, La., February 1985.
[11] Perkampus H. Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy. VCH, N.Y., 1995. 387.
[12] Rodgers J. Influences of Carpet and Instrumental Parameters on the Identification of Carpet Face Fibers by NIR, AATCC Rev.，2002，6：27. |
| [1] |
GAO Feng1, 2, XING Ya-ge3, 4, LUO Hua-ping1, 2, ZHANG Yuan-hua3, 4, GUO Ling3, 4*. Nondestructive Identification of Apricot Varieties Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 44-51. |
| [2] |
LIU Jia, ZHENG Ya-long, WANG Cheng-bo, YIN Zuo-wei*, PAN Shao-kui. Spectra Characterization of Diaspore-Sapphire From Hotan, Xinjiang[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 176-180. |
| [3] |
BAO Hao1, 2，ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
| [4] |
HE Qing-yuan1, 2, REN Yi1, 2, LIU Jing-hua1, 2, LIU Li1, 2, YANG Hao1, 2, LI Zheng-peng1, 2, ZHAN Qiu-wen1, 2*. Study on Rapid Determination of Qualities of Alfalfa Hay Based on NIRS[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3753-3757. |
| [5] |
HU Cai-ping1, HE Cheng-yu2, KONG Li-wei3, ZHU You-you3*, WU Bin4, ZHOU Hao-xiang3, SUN Jun2. Identification of Tea Based on Near-Infrared Spectra and Fuzzy Linear Discriminant QR Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3802-3805. |
| [6] |
LIU Xin-peng1, SUN Xiang-hong2, QIN Yu-hua1*, ZHANG Min1, GONG Hui-li3. Research on t-SNE Similarity Measurement Method Based on Wasserstein Divergence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3806-3812. |
| [7] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
| [8] |
WANG Qi-biao1, HE Yu-kai1, LUO Yu-shi1, WANG Shu-jun1, XIE Bo2, DENG Chao2*, LIU Yong3, TUO Xian-guo3. Study on Analysis Method of Distiller's Grains Acidity Based on
Convolutional Neural Network and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3726-3731. |
| [9] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
| [10] |
ZHANG Shu-fang1, LEI Lei2, LEI Shun-xin2, TAN Xue-cai1, LIU Shao-gang1, YAN Jun1*. Traceability of Geographical Origin of Jasmine Based on Near
Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3389-3395. |
| [11] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
| [12] |
HUANG Meng-qiang1, KUANG Wen-jian2, 3*, LIU Xiang1, HE Liang4. Quantitative Analysis of Cotton/Polyester/Wool Blended Fiber Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3565-3570. |
| [13] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
| [14] |
KANG Ming-yue1, 3, WANG Cheng1, SUN Hong-yan3, LI Zuo-lin2, LUO Bin1*. Research on Internal Quality Detection Method of Cherry Tomatoes Based on Improved WOA-LSSVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3541-3550. |
| [15] |
HUANG Hua1, LIU Ya2, KUERBANGULI·Dulikun1, ZENG Fan-lin1, MAYIRAN·Maimaiti1, AWAGULI·Maimaiti1, MAIDINUERHAN·Aizezi1, GUO Jun-xian3*. Ensemble Learning Model Incorporating Fractional Differential and
PIMP-RF Algorithm to Predict Soluble Solids Content of Apples
During Maturing Period[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3059-3066. |
|
|
|
|
