|
|
|
|
|
|
A Study of Fast Detection of Nitrite in Seawater Based on Sequential Injection Analysis |
YANG Ze-ming1, 2, LI Cai1*, LU Gui-xin1, CAO Wen-xi1 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
Abstract An automatic fast determination method of nitrite in seawater was developed by optimizing the previous self-research of sequential injection analysis (SIA), combining our self-developed Z-type liquid waveguide capillary cell (LWCC) flow cell and tubing-looper, using spectrophotometry and incomplete chromogenic reaction to accomplish the automatic fast determination and make its measurement process more suitable for in-situ analysis and monitoring. The heart of the injection technology is a high-precision syringe pump and a multiposition valve (MVP). Cooperating with MVP, the syringe pump inhales samples and reagents in a holding coil in sequence, and then reversely pushes the mixed solution to the mixing coil and an incomplete chromogenic reaction occurred during this period. The syringe pump finally slowly pushes the mixed solution through the Z-type LWCC flow cell, meanwhile, the absorbance changes of flow solution is detected by a spectrometer, and the nitrite concentration of sample is acquired with Lambert-Beer law. Several key parameters of the fast detection method, such as incomplete chromogenic reaction time, flow rate of mixed solution during detection and salinity were analyzed for stable and fast analysis purposes. The study on the incomplete chromogenic reaction shows that the relative standard deviations (RSDs) of absorbance measurement results are all less than 1.64% within 10~60 s reaction time, indicating the chromogenic reaction time of 10~60 s has no effect on the fast detection method, therefore, 10 s is selected as the fast detection method chromogenic reaction time. The research of mixed solution’s flow rate during detection shows that the flow rate has a large effect on the absorbance detection. Rapid flow rate influences the detection instability, and slow flow rate is not conducive to the fast detection. The stability and repeatability of absorbance measurement results are analyzed under the speeds of 10, 11.6, 13 and 15 μL·s-1, which are relatively stable on absorbance measurement on the basis of experimental verification. The analysis results indicate that the linearity under the above four flow rates are all good, so the fastest speed 15 μL·s-1 is selected for the fast detection method. The absorbance changes of three different concentrations of nitrite (150, 250, 350 μg·L-1) in the 0~35 salinity range are analyzed to verify the sensitivity of this fast detection method to salinity and the adaptation to freshwater and the wide range of seawater. The RSDs are 1.39%, 2.03% and 1.28% respectively, indicating that salinity has no effect on this method. The RSDs measured of parallel 80, 150, and 250 μg·L-1 nitrite standard solutions for 11 times are 2.13%, 1.07% and 1.83% respectively, indicating that this fast detection method has a good precision. The detection limit of this method acquired by taking 10 parallel samples of blank samples is 37 μg·L-1 (about 0.5 μmol·L-1). In order to verify the credibility, the standard curves of same batch nitrite standard solutions are made by using the fast detection method in this paper and the standard method in “Specifications for oceanographic survey”. The R2 of above two methods are both greater than 0.999, and the linear regression equation of the measurement data obtained by the two methods of same concentration sample is y=1.046 1x-0.005 7 with the R2=0.999 6, which shows that the results of the two methods are highly consistent, further verifying the feasibility and reliability of the fast detection method in this paper.The determination rate of this method is up to 50 samples·hour-1. Compared with the traditional manual detection method and flow injection analysis method, the nitrite fast detection method in this paper shortens the time -consumed from a dozen minutes to a minute or so, reduces the sample and reagents consumption in the entire detection process. The fast detection method has a good repeatability, and the whole measurement process is fully automated, and the operation is simpler and more intelligent, which avoids the error caused by manual intervention and makes the nutrients online and in-situ detection system based on spectrophotometry more compact, fast and low-consumption, which is more suitable for in-situ and long time monitoring. The fast detection method in this paper is applicable to other seawater nutrients as long as it is slightly adjusted, having a wide range of applications and good application prospects.
|
Received: 2018-01-29
Accepted: 2018-05-16
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Cai
E-mail: liclaire@scsio.ac.cn
|
|
[1] Conley D J, Paerl H W, Howarth R W, et al. Science, 2009, 323(5917): 1014.
[2] Elser J J, Bracken M E S, Cleland E E, et al. Ecology Letters, 2007, 10(12): 1135.
[3] Kieber R J, Seaton P J. Analytical Chemistry, 1995, 67(18): 3261.
[4] Dore J E, Karl D M. Deep-Sea Research Part Ii-Topical Studies in Oceanography, 1996, 43(2-3): 385.
[5] Smith V H. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2003, 10(2): 126.
[6] National Marine Environmental Monitoring Center(国家海洋环境监测中心). Specifications for Oecanographic Survey—Part 4: Survey of Chemical Parameters in Sea Water(海洋调查规范—第4部分:海水化学要素调查),1998.
[7] YANG Ze-ming, LI Cai, XU Cong-hui, et al(杨泽明, 李 彩, 徐聪辉, 等). Analytical Instrumentation(分析仪器), 2017, (4): 6.
[8] LIN Kun-ning, MA Jian, YUAN Dong-xing, et al(林坤宁, 马 剑, 袁东星,等). Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry(分析化学), 2017, (2): 151.
[9] Feng S, Zhang M, Huang Y, et al. Talanta, 2013, 117: 456.
[10] Adornato L R, Kaltenbacher E A, Greenhow D R, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(11): 4045.
[11] Ellis P S, Shabani A M, Gentle B S, et al. Talanta, 2011, 84(1): 98.
[12] Ruzicka J, Marshall G D. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1990, 237(2): 329.
[13] HAN Shuang-lai, XIANG Guang-hong, TANG Xiao-yan, et al(韩双来, 项光宏, 唐小燕, 等). Environmental Monitoring in China(中国环境监测), 2013, (3): 94.
[14] LI Cai, SUN Zhao-hua, CAO Wen-xi, et al(李 彩, 孙兆华,曹文熙, 等). Optical Technique(光学技术), 2009, 35: 579.
[15] GAO Xiang-yang(高向阳). New Instrumental Analysis(新编仪器分析). Beijing: Science Press(北京:科学出版社), 1992. 26.
[16] FANG Zhao-lun(方肇伦). Flow Injection Analysis(流动注射分析法). Beijing: Science Press(北京:科学出版社), 2003. 6. |
[1] |
LU Wen-jing, FANG Ya-ping, LIN Tai-feng, WANG Hui-qin, ZHENG Da-wei, ZHANG Ping*. Rapid Identification of the Raman Phenotypes of Breast Cancer Cell
Derived Exosomes and the Relationship With Maternal Cells[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3840-3846. |
[2] |
GUO Ge1, 3, 4, ZHANG Meng-ling3, 4, GONG Zhi-jie3, 4, ZHANG Shi-zhuang3, 4, WANG Xiao-yu2, 5, 6*, ZHOU Zhong-hua1*, YANG Yu2, 5, 6, XIE Guang-hui3, 4. Construction of Biomass Ash Content Model Based on Near-Infrared
Spectroscopy and Complex Sample Set Partitioning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3143-3149. |
[3] |
CHENG Fang-beibei1, 2, GAN Ting-ting1, 3*, ZHAO Nan-jing1, 4*, YIN Gao-fang1, WANG Ying1, 3, FAN Meng-xi4. Rapid Detection of Heavy Metal Lead in Water Based on Enrichment by Chlorella Pyrenoidosa Combined With X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2500-2506. |
[4] |
LI Bin, SU Cheng-tao, YIN Hai, LIU Yan-de*. Hyperspectral Imaging Technology Combined With Machine Learning for Detection of Moldy Rice[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2391-2396. |
[5] |
ZHANG Jing, GUO Zhen, WANG Si-hua, YUE Ming-hui, ZHANG Shan-shan, PENG Hui-hui, YIN Xiang, DU Juan*, MA Cheng-ye*. Comparison of Methods for Water Content in Rice by Portable Near-Infrared and Visible Light Spectrometers[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2059-2066. |
[6] |
ZHANG Rong1, 2, DUAN Ning1, 3, JIANG Lin-hua1, 3*, XU Fu-yuan3, JIN Wei3, LI Jian-hui1. Study on Optical Path Optimization for Direct Determination of
Spectrophotometry of High Concentration Hexavalent Chromium
Solution by Ultraviolet Visible Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1829-1837. |
[7] |
HUANG Xiao-wei1, ZHANG Ning1, LI Zhi-hua1, SHI Ji-yong1, SUN Yue1, ZHANG Xin-ai1, ZOU Xiao-bo1, 2*. Detection of Carbendazim Residue in Apple Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Labeling Immunoassay[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1478-1484. |
[8] |
SHI Zhi-feng1, 2, LIU Jia2, XIAO Juan2, ZHENG Zhi-wen1*. Investigation of Novel Method for Detecting Vanillin Based on X-Ray Diffraction Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1563-1568. |
[9] |
WANG Yi-tao1, WU Cheng-zhao1, HU Dong1, SUN Tong1, 2*. Research Progress of Plasticizer Detection Based on Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1298-1305. |
[10] |
DONG Xin-xin, YANG Fang-wei, YU Hang, YAO Wei-rong, XIE Yun-fei*. Study on Rapid Nondestructive Detection of Pork Lean Freshness Based on Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 484-488. |
[11] |
LIU Feng-xiang, HE Shuai, ZHANG Li-hao, HUANG Xia, SONG Yi-zhi*. Application of Raman Spectroscopy in Detection of Pathogenic Microorganisms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3653-3658. |
[12] |
CHEN Yu-nan1, 2, 3, YANG Rui-fang1, 3*, ZHAO Nan-jing1, 3*, ZHU Wei1, 2, 3, CHEN Xiao-wei1, 2, 3, ZHANG Rui-qi1, 2, 3. Research on Measuring Oil Film Thickness Based on Laser-Induced Water Raman Suppression Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3954-3962. |
[13] |
YAN Kang-ting1, 2, HAN Yi-fang1, 2, WANG Lin-lin1, 2, DING Fan3, LAN Yu-bin1, 2*, ZHANG Ya-li2, 3*. Research on the Fluorescence Spectra Characteristics of Abamectin Technical and Preparation Solution[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3476-3481. |
[14] |
ZHANG Qian, DONG Xiang-hui, YAO Wei-rong, YU Hang, XIE Yun-fei*. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Rapid Detection of Flunixin Meglumine Residues in Pork[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3155-3160. |
[15] |
HU Yu-xia1, CHEN Jie1, SHAO Hui1, YAN Pu1, XU Heng1, SUN Long1, XIAO Xiao1, XIU Lei3, FENG Chun2GAN Ting-ting2, ZHAO Nan-jing2*. Research Progress of Spectroscopy Detection Technologies for Waterborne Pathogens[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2672-2678. |
|
|
|
|