|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of Hyperspectral Variation of Different Potato Cultivars Based on Continuum Removed Spectra |
LUO Shan-jun1, HE Ying-bin1, 2*, DUAN Ding-ding2, WANG Zhuo-zhuo1, ZHANG Jing-ke3, ZHANG Yuan-tao1, ZHU Ya-qiu1, YU Jin-kuan2 |
1. School of Management, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China
2. Institute of Agriculture Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
3. School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences,Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China |
|
|
Abstract Under the background of carrying out the “potato staple food” strategy in China, it is of great significance to do more related researches of the potato crop. In this paper, the comparison and analyses of spectral differences of different potato cultivars in different periods were aimed to provide theoretical and technical support to the identification of potato varieties, the distinction of potatoes and other crops, the extraction of potato spatial distribution, the monitoring of potato pests and diseases, the impacts of potato stresses as well as the various crop identification studies and provide a new idea for the crop hyperspectral correlation research. What’s more, the canopy hyperspectral reflectance data of the early maturing potato cultivar (Favorite), the middle-late maturing cultivar (Yanshu 4) at the tuber stage and expansion stage were obtained through field experiments in Jilin area. Firstly, the noise was removed by the method of Savitzky-Golay filtering. Then the spectra of continuum removal were obtained by the method of continuum removal and 6 parameters (the maximum absorption depth, total area, left area, right area, symmetry and area normalized maximal absorption depth) were extracted. Meanwhile, the first-order derivatives were calculated using the filtered spectral reflectance data and the spectral reflectance data of continuum removal. On the basis of the comparison of the two spectral reflectance curves of different potato cultivars, 8 different indices of 3 groups (reflectance difference index, first order derivative difference index, spectral parameters of continuum removal difference index) were constructed as evaluation indices. The reflectance difference index and first order derivative difference index were calculated using the bands of green light at 550 nm, red light at 670 nm and near-infrared light at 760 nm. Furthermore, we quantitatively analyzed the hyperspectral differences of different potato cultivars using these difference indices. In this paper, the method of continuum removal was applied to the analyses of hyperspectral differences of different potato cultivars with different growth stages. The difference indices in the article finally achieved good evaluation performence. The results showed that: (1) Compared with the reflectance difference index and maximum absorption depth difference index, the first order derivative difference index, total area difference index, left area difference index, right area difference index, symmetry difference index and normalized difference index could show the hyperspectral difference of different potato cultivars well. The spectra of continuum removal partially magnified the hyperspectral differences of two different potato cultivars. (2) The wavelength position and growth period of the filtered spectra and the spectra of continuum removal with the largest difference were the same located at the wavelength of 671.24 nm on August 16. The value of maximum absorption depth difference index was only 0.01. The value of first order derivative difference index of the filtered spectra reached 0.977 at the wavelength of 673.55 nm on June 24. The value of the first order derivative difference index of the continuum removed spectra reached 47.87 at the wavelength of 759.74 nm on June 24, which worked the best in spectral difference analyses of different potato cultivars. Besides, the total area difference index, right area difference index, symmetry difference index and normalized difference index all reached the maximum on June 24, with the values of 0.13, 0.214, 0.205 and 0.113, respectively. The left area difference index value reached the maximum of 0.199 on July 24. (3) According to the quantitative evaluation results of the difference indices, we could see that the period with the biggest hyperspectral difference of the two different potato cultivars is in the medium-late stage of tuber stage of early-maturing variety and initial stage of tuber stage of medium-late maturing variety.
|
Received: 2018-01-07
Accepted: 2018-05-28
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
HE Ying-bin
E-mail: heyingbin@caas.cn
|
|
[1] MAO Xue-feng, LIU Jing, ZHU Xin-kai(毛学峰,刘 靖,朱信凯). Management World(管理世界), 2015, (3): 76.
[2] DAI Xiao-ai, YANG Xiao-xia, GAO Xiao-jie, et al(戴晓爱,杨晓霞,高孝杰,等). Remote Sensing Technology and Application(遥感技术与应用), 2015, 30(6): 1095.
[3] MAO Heng-chang(茅恒昌). China Southern Agricultural Machiner(南方农机), 2017, 48(22): 88.
[4] XU Meng-ling, LI Xiao-yu, KU Jing, et al(徐梦玲,李小昱,库 静,等). Journal of Food Safety & Quality(食品安全质量检测学报), 2015, 6(8): 2988.
[5] ZHAO Ming-fu, LIU Zi-di, ZOU Xue, et al(赵明富,刘自迪,邹 雪,等). Laser Journal(激光杂志), 2016, 37(3): 20.
[6] WANG Li-yan, XUE He-ru, JIANG Xin-hua, et al(王丽艳,薛河儒,姜新华,等). Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University·Natural Science Edition(内蒙古农业大学学报·自然科学版), 2016, 37(2): 102.
[7] HE Cai-lian, ZHENG Shun-lin, ZHOU Shao-meng, et al(何彩莲,郑顺林,周少猛,等). Journal of South China Agricultural University(华南农业大学学报), 2016, 37(5): 45.
[8] XU Ming-zhu, LI Mei, BAI Zhi-peng, et al(徐明珠,李 梅,白志鹏,等). Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research(农机化研究), 2016, 38(6): 205.
[9] HUANG Chong, LIU Wan-cai(黄 冲,刘万才). Plant Protection(植物保护), 2016, 42(5): 142.
[10] LI Fen-ling, CHANG Qing-rui(李粉玲,常庆瑞). Transaction of the Chinese Society for Agriculture Machinery(农业机械学报), 2017, 48(7): 174.
[11] PENG Jie, CHI Chun-ming, XIANG Hong-ying, et al(彭 杰,迟春明,向红英,等). Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报), 2014, 51(3): 459.
[12] LI Dang-hui, XIE Min, QIAO Feng(李党辉,谢 敏,乔 枫). Res. Soil Water Conserv.(水土保持研究), 2017, 24(3): 136.
[13] HAN Zhao-ying, ZHU Xi-cun, WANG Ling, et al(韩兆迎,朱西存,王 凌,等). Laser and Optoelectronics Progress(激光与光电子学进展), 2016, 53(2): 220.
[14] ZHOU Yang-fan, CHEN You-qi, ZOU Jin-qiu, et al(周扬帆,陈佑启,邹金秋,等). Chin. Sci. Technol. Resour. Rev.(中国科技资源导刊), 2017, 49(5): 104.
[15] QIAN Yu-rong, YU Jiong, JIA Zhen-hong, et al(钱育蓉,于 炯,贾振红,等). Acta Prataculturae Sinica(草业学报), 2013, 22(1): 157.
[16] REN Zhe, CHEN Huai-liang, WANG Lian-xi, et al(任 哲,陈怀亮,王连喜,等). Remote Sensing for Land & Resources(国土资源遥感), 2015, 27(4): 34.
|
[1] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[3] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[4] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[5] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[6] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[7] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[8] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[9] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[10] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[11] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
[12] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[13] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[14] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
[15] |
TAO Jing-zhe1, 3, SONG De-rui1, 3, SONG Chuan-ming2, WANG Xiang-hai1, 2*. Multi-Band Remote Sensing Image Sharpening: A Survey[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2999-3008. |
|
|
|
|