|
|
|
|
|
|
Hyperspectral Camouflaged Identification Driven by Spatial-Spectral
Characteristics |
LIU En-qin1, 2, HUANG Wei3, XU Yong3, YANG Man2, GAO Bing2, MO Ding-ru4 |
1. Key Laboratory of Smart Earth, Beijing 100029, China
2. College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
3. People's Liberation Army Unit 61287, Chengdu 610036, China
4. College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
|
|
|
Abstract To address the issues of incomplete contour and fragmented spatial information caused by the sole use of spectral features in hyperspectral remote sensing identification of camouflage, this study proposes a method for identifying camouflage in hyperspectral remote sensing by integrating spatial and spectral features. An imaging spectrometer was employed to capture close-range hyperspectral imagery spanning 400~900 nm spectral range with 1 nm resolution under a grassland background. Spectral features (first derivative, second derivative, spectral indices, etc.) and texture features (mean, entropy, second moment, etc.) were extracted, and the differences between camouflaged objects and the grassland background were analyzed. The Mahalanobis distance method was used to screen out sensitive parameters conducive to camouflage identification, and then multiple band combination strategies were proposed, resulting in five datasets being constructed. Three methods, namely, multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLP), support vector machine (SVM), and spectral angle (SAM), were used to identify camouflage. The results show that: (1) Among the spectral feature variables, the red band, near-infrared, “red edge”, and narrow-band spectral indices (CR1, ARI1, and ARI2) are very beneficial for the identification of camouflage. Among the texture feature variables, mean and contrast are sensitive bands for the identification of camouflage. (2) Compared with the identification results using only spectral or texture features, the dataset integrating spatial-spectral features has better integrity and higher accuracy in identifying camouflage. The "red edge" feature alone failed to identify camouflage, but when combined with other bands, it could identify camouflage. (3) Among the five datasets, dataset 4, composed of four bands (red, near-infrared, mean, and contrast), has the highest accuracy in identifying camouflage, with a producer's accuracy of 99.85% and a user's accuracy of 99.34%. This band combination strategy can be extended to the identification of camouflage in multispectral remote sensing images. (4) Among the three identification methods, SVM performs the best overall and can effectively identify camouflage, while SAM performs poorly. The research results can be extended to the identification of new color schemes and camouflage patterns, and the selected sensitive bands and effective identification features can serve as the basis for feature extraction and target identification in hyperspectral remote sensing images from unmanned aerial vehicles and satellites.
|
Received: 2025-05-07
Accepted: 2025-07-14
|
|
|
[1] Bi H, Zhang C, Wang K, et al. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2021, 32(9): 5708.
[2] CHEN Yu, QUAN Ji-chuan(陈 宇,权冀川). Computer Engineering and Applications(计算机工程与应用), 2025, 61(7): 42.
[3] Bhargava A, Sachdeva A, Sharma K, et al. Heliyon, 2024, 10(12): e33208.
[4] MA Shi-xin, LIU Chun-tong, LI Hong-cai, et al(马世欣,刘春桐,李洪才, 等). Acta Armamentarii(兵工学报), 2019, 40(7): 1485.
[5] SUN Bang-yong, SHI Yu-han, YU Tao(孙帮勇,施雨含,于 涛). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2024, 44(19): 1910001.
[6] Zhao J, Zhou B, Wang G, et al. Photonics, 2022, 9(9): 640.
[7] He Z, Gan Y, Ma S, et al. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2023, 2023(1): 11.
[8] LAN Jin-hui, ZOU Jin-lin, HAO Yan-shuang, et al(蓝金辉,邹金霖,郝彦爽,等). National Remote Sensing Bulletin(遥感学报), 2018,22(1):13.
[9] XU Jing-yu, BAO Ni-sha, LANG Jie-shuang, et al(徐景余,包妮沙,郎洁双, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2024, 44(12): 3534.
[10] Ren J J, Hu X W, Zhu L, et al. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2023, 33(3): 1157.
[11] Li P, Yan X, Zhu H, et al. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2022, 31: 6396.
[12] XIAN Xiao-dong, LI Ke-wen(鲜晓东,李克文). Journal of Computer Applications(计算机应用), 2013, 33(2): 539.
[13] Liu E, Zhao H, Zhang S, et al. Ecological Informatics, 2021, 61(5): 101213.
[14] Rouse J W, Haas R H, Schell J A, et al. Monitoring Vegetation Systems in the Great Plains with ERTS, Third ERTS-1 Symposium NASA, NASA Special Publication 351, 1974, 309.
[15] Hunt Jr. E R, Rock B N. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1989, 30(1): 43.
[16] Clevers J G P W, Gitelson A A. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2013, 23: 344.
[17] Lobell D B, Asner G P. Hyperion Studies of Crop Stress in Mexico. Proceedings of the 12th JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, 2004.
[18] Gupta R K, Vijayan D, Prasad T S. Advances in Space Research, 2003, 32(11): 2217.
[19] Vogelmann J E, Rock B N, Moss D M. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1993, 14(8): 1563.
[20] Heege H J, Reusch S. Forschung, 2002, 27(1-2): 8.
[21] Gamon J A, Penuelas J, Field C B. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1992, 41(1): 35.
[22] Gamon J A, Surfus J S. New Phytologist, 1999, 143(1): 105.
[23] Merzlyak M N, Gitelson A A, Chivkunova O B, et al. Physiologia Plantarum, 1999, 106(1): 135.
[24] Gitelson A A, Zur Y, Chivkunova O B, et al. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2002, 75(3): 272.
[25] Gitelson A A, Merzlyak M N, Chivkunova O B. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2001, 74(1): 38.
[26] Ai Z, An R, Lu C, et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2020, 41(5): 1813.
[27] Mahalanobis P C. On the Generalised Distance in Statistics, Proceedings of the National Institute of Science of India, 1936. 49.
[28] SHAO Wen-jing, SUN Wei-wei, YANG Gang(邵文静,孙伟伟,杨 刚). Remote Sensing Technology and Application(遥感技术与应用), 2021, 36(2): 431.
[29] Erdem F, Bayrak O C. Ecological Informatics, 2023, 78:102389.
[30] Haralick R M, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1973, SMC-3(6): 610.
[31] LIU Wei, SUN Hai-xia, YANG Xiao-bo(刘 炜,孙海霞,杨晓波). Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves(红外与毫米波学报), 2020, 39(1): 99.
[32] Liu P, Choo K-K R, Wang L, et al. Soft Computing, 2017, 21: 7053.
[33] Zhang C, Pan X, Li H, et al. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2018, 140: 133.
[34] Zhao Q, Wang F, Wang W, et al. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 5159.
|
[1] |
LI Chang-sheng, GAO Shu-hui*, LI Kai-kai. Feature Analysis and Classification of the Line-Crossing Sequences
Between Stamp Inks and Laser Printing Toner Based on
Hyperspectral Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(10): 2804-2815. |
[2] |
WU Qiang1, YANG Mo-han1, DUAN Feng-hui1, WANG Zan-pu2, KANG Jia-kun1, YANG Hao3, YANG Gui-jun3, ZHANG Zhi-yong1, MA Xin-ming1, CHENG Jin-peng1*. Accurate Estimation of Maize Above-Ground Biomass Using Integrated Multispectral and LiDAR Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(10): 2906-2914. |
[3] |
SHENG Shu-li1, ZOU Ming-min1, 2*, LIU Tian-qi1, CHENG Yong-ping1, CHEN Zi-zheng1, WANG Xu-wen1. Research on Satellite Greenhouse Gas Remote Sensing Retrieval Methods Based on Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(10): 2983-2991. |
[4] |
WEN Zhu1, GUO Song1, SHU Tian1, ZHAO Long-cai2, 3. Hyperspectral Estimation of Selenium Content in Selenium-Rich Tea Based on Feature Selection and Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(09): 2590-2596. |
[5] |
HU Wei-cheng, LI Yun-peng*, WANG Hong-wei, DAI Xue-jing, WANG Hua-peng. Hyperspectral Image Visualization and Recognition of Bloodstains and Their Analogues Based on Attention Mechanism[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(09): 2625-2631. |
[6] |
LI Yun-peng, WANG Hong-wei, DAI Xue-jing, WU Lian-quan, HU Wei-cheng, ZHANG Yan-chun. Fast Visual Identification Method of Pyrotechnic Composition Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(08): 2183-2189. |
[7] |
KONG Ling-yuan1, 2, HUANG Qing-feng1, 2, NI Chen1, 2, XU Jia-jia1, 2, TANG Xue-hai1, 2*. Estimation of Nitrogen Content of Carya illinoinensis Leaves Based on Canopy Hyperspectral and Wavelet Transform at Different Flight Heights[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(08): 2200-2209. |
[8] |
LI Shan1, 2, 3, LIN Peng1, 2, 3, XU Zhen-hao1, 2, 3*, XIANG Hang1, 2, 3, LI Qian-ji1, 2, 3. Intelligent Lithology Identification Based on Transfer Learning of Rock Hyperspectral Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(08): 2289-2301. |
[9] |
TANG Bin1, LUO Xi-ling1, WANG Jian-xu1, FAN Wen-qi2*, SUN Yu-yu1, LIU Jia-lu2, TANG Huan2, ZHAO Ya3*, ZHONG Nian-bing1. Hyperspectral Image Classification of Pigments Based on Multiscale
Spatial-Spectral Feature Extraction[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(08): 2364-2372. |
[10] |
WU Qiang1, LU Ling2, FENG Xiao-juan2, WANG Meng2, WANG Yong-long2, HOU Ding-yi3, FAN Bo-bo2*, LIU Jie2*. Hyperspectral Identification and Classification of Different Cultivation Methods of A. mongholicus[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(07): 1842-1847. |
[11] |
LI Ze-qi1, YANG Zheng1, ZHOU Zhuang-fei1, PENG Ji-yu1, ZHU Feng-le1*, HE Qing-hai2. Detection of Moisture Content in Strawberry Leaves Using Hyperspectral and Broad Learning System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(06): 1534-1542. |
[12] |
PENG Jian-heng1, HU Xin-jun1, 2*, ZHANG Jia-hong1, TIAN Jian-ping1, CHEN Man-jiao1, HUANG Dan2, LUO Hui-bo2. Identification and Adulteration Detection of Lotus Root Starch Using
Hyperspectral Imaging Technology Combined With Deep Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(06): 1759-1767. |
[13] |
JIANG Heng1, LÜ Zi-wei1, LI Yang2, DONG Tuo1*. A Novel Strategy for Viral Detection in Acute Respiratory Infections: Combining SERS With Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(05): 1217-1224. |
[14] |
LI Ruo-tong1, HU Hui-qiang2, CAO Shi-yu1, LU Meng-yao1, LIU Meng-ran1, FU Jia-yue1, MAO Xiao-bo2, WANG Hai-bo3*, FU Ling1, 3*. Identification of Pinelliae Rhizoma Decoction Pieces by Hyperspectral
Imaging Combined With Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(05): 1236-1242. |
[15] |
DENG Ying-jiao1, CHEN Jun2, WANG Jian-sheng1, HU Liu-ping3, ZHANG Qing1, DU Yu-zhen3, WANG Yan1, LI Qing-li1*. Analysis of Urine Sediment Samples Based on Microscopy Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(05): 1243-1250. |
|
|
|
|