|
|
|
|
|
|
Airborne Hyperspectral Features of Three Types of Typical Surface Vegetation in Central Yunnan |
HU Lin1, GAN Shu1,2*, YUAN Xi-ping2,3, LI Yan1, 4, LÜ Jie1, 2, YANG Ming-long1, 2 |
1. School of Land and Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
2. Yunnan Institute of Engineering Research and Application of Plateau Mountain Spatial Information Surveying and Mapping Technology, Kunming 650093, China
3. West Yunnan University of Applied Sciences, Dali 671000, China
4. Research Institute of Yunnan Bureau of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defence, Kunming 650118, China |
|
|
Abstract Hyperspectral remote sensing technology has the advantages of map integration. And compared with the traditional multispectral remote sensing technology, it can realize the accurate identification of the target. Therefore, it is gradually applied to the detection of surface vegetation. In this paper, the three typical surface vegetations are bamboo forest, armand pine and spinney in central Yunnan, which were taken as the research objects. In order to get the hyperspectral features of three typical surface vegetation types in central Yunnan, based on the airborne hyperspectral image data, the original high spectrum, first-order differential treatment spectra and the continuum removal spectra were compared and analyzed. Results showed the following: (1) Based on the analysis of the original spectral features, the optimal band window of the original hyperspectral of the three typical surface vegetations appeared in 690~946 nm, and the spectral reflectance characteristics in this band range were bamboo forest>armand pine>spinney; (2) The analysis of spectral features by first-order differential processing shows that the spectral difference of vegetation can be enhanced by spectral differential transformation. After the first-order differential treatment, the optimal band window of the spectrum appeared in the range of 670~774 nm, and the first-order differential coefficient is bamboo forest>armand pine>spinney. Moreover, it was found that 718 nm was the sensitive band of the three types of vegetation, and the characteristic sensitive band of 718 nm could be used to distinguish the three types of vegetation. In addition, three types of vegetation types can be distinguished by comprehensively applying the characteristic parameters of the first-order differential spectrum, including the blue edge amplitude, the yellow edge amplitude, the red edge amplitude, the blue edge area, the yellow edge area and the red edge area. (3) Finally, based on the analysis of the spectral features of the continuum removal treatment, it is concluded that the continuum removal method can effectively enhance the spectral curve reflection and absorption features of vegetation. After the continuum removal, the optimal band window of the three typical vegetations was between 458~554 and 570~690 nm. In the range of these two bands, the first-order differential coefficient is bamboo forest>armand pine>spinney. Moreover, it was found that 502 and 674 nm were sensitive bands of the three types of vegetation, and this feature could be used to distinguish the three types of vegetation comprehensively. The research results of this paper are helpful to provide technical methods for the fine discrimination of forest vegetation in central Yunnan. At the same time, it will provide technical support for the future development of integrated remote sensing vegetation fine classification of space-ground-air hyperspectral image data.
|
Received: 2020-09-23
Accepted: 2021-01-26
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
GAN Shu
E-mail: 1193887560@qq.com
|
|
[1] Xu Z, Shen X, Cao L, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2020, 92: 102.
[2] Vaglio Laurin G, Puletti N, Grotti M, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2020, 92: 102.
[3] HUANG Hua-guo(黄华国). Journal of Beijing Forestry University(北京林业大学学报), 2019, 41(12): 1.
[4] Wan L, Lin Y, Zhang H, et al. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(4): 656.
[5] Cao J, Leng W, Liu K, et al. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(2): 89.
[6] ZHANG Ying, ZHANG Xiao-li, WANG Shu-han, et al(张 莹,张晓丽,王书涵, 等). Journal of Northwest A&F University(西北农林科技大学学报·自然科学版), 2016, 44(2): 83.
[7] ZI Li, XIE Fu-ming, SHU Qing-tai, et al(字 李,谢福明,舒清态, 等). Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University·Natural Science Edition(福建农林大学学报·自然科学版), 2019, 48(1): 55.
[8] ZHOU Wei, LI Hao-ran, SHI Pei-qi, et al(周 伟,李浩然,石佩琪, 等). Journal of Geo-information Science(地球信息科学学报), 2020, 22(8): 1735.
[9] Rubio-Delgado J, Pérez C J, Vega-Rodríguez M A. Precision Agriculture, 2021,22:1.
[10] Cao J, Leng W, Liu K, et al. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(2): 89.
[11] Adão T, Hruška J, Pádua L, et al. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(11): 1110.
[12] Cao J, Liu K, Zhu Y, et al. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(12): 2047.
[13] DUAN Hua-chao, LI Shuang-zhi, CHA Xiao-fei, et al(段华超,李双智,茶晓飞,等). Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University·Natural Science Edition(福建农林大学学报·自然科学版), 2020, 49(3): 380.
[14] ZHANG Su-lan, QIN Ju, TANG Xiao-dong, et al(张素兰,覃 菊,唐晓东, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(3): 865.
[15] LI Zhe, GUO Xu-dong, GU Chun, et al(李 喆, 郭旭东,古 春,等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2016, 20(2): 290.
[16] LI Fen-ling, CHANG Qing-rui(李粉玲,常庆瑞). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2017, 48(7): 174. |
[1] |
XU Tian1, 2, LI Jing1, 2, LIU Zhen-hua1, 2*. Remote Sensing Inversion of Soil Manganese in Nanchuan District, Chongqing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 69-75. |
[2] |
LI Hu1, ZHONG Yun1, 2, FENG Ya-ting1, LIN Zhen1, ZHU Shi-jiang1, 2*. Multi-Vegetation Index Soil Moisture Inversion Model Based on UAV
Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 207-214. |
[3] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[4] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[5] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[6] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[7] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[8] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[9] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[10] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[11] |
LI Si-yuan, JIAO Jian-nan, WANG Chi*. Specular Reflection Removal Method Based on Polarization Spectrum
Fusion and Its Application in Vegetation Health Monitoring[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3607-3614. |
[12] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[13] |
ZHENG Shu-yuan1, 2, HAI Yan1, 2, HE Meng-qi1, 2, WANG Jian-xiong1, 2. Construction of Vegetation Index in Visible Light Band of GF-6 Image With Higher Discrimination[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3509-3517. |
[14] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[15] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
|
|
|
|