|
|
|
|
|
|
Detecting Adulterated Beef Meatball Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technology |
SUN Zong-bao, WANG Tian-zhen, LI Jun-kui, ZOU Xiao-bo*, LIANG Li-ming, LIU Xiao-yu |
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China |
|
|
Abstract Beef meatball is a deep-processed meat product with a unique taste. In the market, some unscrupulous traders cashed in on mixing beef with cheap meat such as pork and chicken to make meatballs. The traditional methods of meat adulteration detection are time-consuming and costly. Hyperspectral imaging technique has the advantages of fast, non-destructive and low cost on meat test. Therefore, the detection of beef meatballs adulterated with pork and chicken was carried out by hyperspectral imaging technique in this study. Adulterated meat was added to the beef meatballs at a level of 0, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% of the quality of raw meat respectively. All meatballs hyperspectral data were collected while their spectral data were extracted. The spectral data were pretreated by six methods, first derivative (1st Der), second derivative (2nd Der), mean centering (MC), multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), Savitzky-Golay (SG), standard normal variate transformation (SNVT), which established the Partial least squares model of adulteration content at the full-wave band and obtained the optimum pretreatment method by comparison. After the optimum pre-processing method, the characteristic wavelengths were screened by successive projections algorithm (SPA), competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS), synergy interval partial least squares (siPLS), synergy interval partial least squares-competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (siPLS-CARS), for the purpose of comparing, the prediction effects of models were evaluated on different screening wavelengths methods. The results suggested that the best pre-processing methods of PLS prediction model for beef meatballs adulterated with pork and chicken were MSC and 1st Der. 13, 51 and 32 characteristic wavelengths of adulterated pork spectra were screened by SPA, CARS and siPLS-CARS, respectively. The characteristic subinterval combinations were screened by siPLS: the full-wave band was divided into 14 subintervals, which was then combined with the 1st, 3rd, 7th, and 13th subintervals to establish PLS prediction models. The prediction model of adulterated pork content by CARS wavelength screening method had the best effect, with the RC and RP at 0.981 4 and 0.972 1 respectively, while RMSECV and RMSEP at 0.016 3 and 0.020 3 respectively. 15, 61 and 28 characteristic wavelengths of adulterated chicken spectra were screened by SPA, CARS and siPLS-CARS, respectively. The full spectrum was divided into 15 subintervals by siPLS, combined with the 7th, 8th, 11th, and 12th subintervals to establish PLS prediction models. Analogously, the prediction model of adulterated chicken content by CARS wavelength screening method had the best effect as well, with RC and RP at 0.990 2 and 0.987 8 respectively, and RMSECV and RMSEP at 0.012 3 and 0.012 6 respectively. In this study, compared with siPLS, siPLS-CARS not only reduced the number of characteristic wavelengths but also improved the accuracy of the model prediction. Compared with CARS, it screened for fewer wavelengths, but with slightly lower accuracy. Compared with adulterated pork, the prediction model of adulterated chicken was better on the whole. The research results suggested that hyperspectral imaging technique can realize the content prediction of adulterated pork and chicken in beef meatballs, which provides a theoretical basis for rapid detection of beef meatball adulteration.
|
Received: 2019-06-24
Accepted: 2019-10-15
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZOU Xiao-bo
E-mail: zou_xiaobo@ujs.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Local Food Safety Standard of Guangdong Province(广东食品安全地方标准). DBS44 005—2016. Shantou Beef Meatball(汕头牛肉丸). Beijing: Standards Press of China(北京:中国标准出版社), 2016. 3.
[2] Mandli J, El Fatimi I, Seddaoui N, et al. Food Chemistry, 2018, 255: 380.
[3] Prusakova O V, Glukhova X A, Afanas Eva G V, et al. Meat Science, 2018, 137: 34.
[4] ZHANG Juan, ZHANG Shen, ZHANG Li, et al(张 娟,张 申,张 力,等). Food Science(食品科学), 2018, 39(4): 296.
[5] Wu Chuyan, Song Tangshi, Xiang Mashi, et al. Optics Express, 2018, 26(8): 10119.
[6] Ropodi A I, Pavlidis D E, Mohareb F, et al. Food Research International, 2015, 67: 12.
[7] Kamruzzaman M, Makino Y, Oshita S, et al. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2015, 8(5): 1054.
[8] Wu Di, Shi Hui, He Yong, et al. Journal of Food Engineering, 2013, 119(3): 680.
[9] Shi Jiyong, Hu Xuetao, Zou Xiaobo, et al. Food Chemistry, 2017, 229: 235.
[10] TANG Hui-ping, ZHANG Yan, HUANG Jing-hui(唐穗平, 张 燕, 黄景辉). Journal of Food Safety & Quality(食品安全质量检测学报), 2016, 7(5): 1882.
[11] YANG Sheng-yuan, ZHONG Xiao-ran, CHEN Dai-wen, et al(杨胜远, 钟晓然, 陈岱雯, 等). Food Science and Technology(食品科技), 2013, 38(5): 136.
[12] Xiong Zhengjie, Sun Dawen, Xie Anguo, et al. Food Chemistry, 2015, 178: 339.
[13] GAO Pan, ZHANG Chu, LÜ Xin, et al(高 攀, 张 初, 吕 新, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2018, 38(6): 1712.
[14] Guo Zhiming, Wang Mingming, Wu Jingzhu, et al. Food Chemistry, 2019, 286: 282.
[15] He Hongju, Wu Di, Sun Dawen. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 2013, 18: 237. |
[1] |
LI Yu1, ZHANG Ke-can1, PENG Li-juan2*, ZHU Zheng-liang1, HE Liang1*. Simultaneous Detection of Glucose and Xylose in Tobacco by Using Partial Least Squares Assisted UV-Vis Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 103-110. |
[2] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[3] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[4] |
LI Wei1, TAN Feng2*, ZHANG Wei1, GAO Lu-si3, LI Jin-shan4. Application of Improved Random Frog Algorithm in Fast Identification of Soybean Varieties[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3763-3769. |
[5] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[6] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[7] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[8] |
DONG Jian-jiang1, TIAN Ye1, ZHANG Jian-xing2, LUAN Zhen-dong2*, DU Zeng-feng2*. Research on the Classification Method of Benthic Fauna Based on
Hyperspectral Data and Random Forest Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3015-3022. |
[9] |
CHEN Jia-wei1, 2, ZHOU De-qiang1, 2*, CUI Chen-hao3, REN Zhi-jun1, ZUO Wen-juan1. Prediction Model of Farinograph Characteristics of Wheat Flour Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3089-3097. |
[10] |
JIA Hao1, 3, 4, ZHANG Wei-fang1, 3, LEI Jing-wei1, 3*, LI Ying-ying1, 3, YANG Chun-jing2, 3*, XIE Cai-xia1, 3, GONG Hai-yan1, 3, DING Xin-yu1, YAO Tian-yi1. Study on Infrared Fingerprint of the Classical Famous
Prescription Yiguanjian[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3202-3210. |
[11] |
YANG Chun-mei1, ZHU Zan-bin1, 2*, LI Yu-cheng1, MA Yan1, SONG Hai-yang3. Bark Content Determination of Ultra-Thin Fibreboard by
Hyperspectral Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3266-3271. |
[12] |
WEI Zi-kai, WANG Jie, ZHANG Ruo-yu, ZHANG Meng-yun*. Classification of Foreign Matter in Cotton Using Line Scan Hyperspectral Transmittance Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3230-3238. |
[13] |
SUN Bang-yong1, YU Meng-ying1, YAO Qi2*. Research on Spectral Reconstruction Method From RGB Imaging Based on Dual Attention Mechanism[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2687-2693. |
[14] |
WU Yong-qing1, 2, TANG Na1, HUANG Lu-yao1, CUI Yu-tong1, ZHANG Bo1, GUO Bo-li1, ZHANG Ying-quan1*. Model Construction for Detecting Water Absorption in Wheat Flour Using Vis-NIR Spectroscopy and Combined With Multivariate Statistical #br#
Analyses[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2825-2831. |
[15] |
KONG De-ming1, LIU Ya-ru1, DU Ya-xin2, CUI Yao-yao2. Oil Film Thickness Detection Based on IRF-IVSO Wavelength Optimization Combined With LIF Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2811-2817. |
|
|
|
|