基于等离子体光谱的γ-TiAl激光冲击强化表面完整性在线监测研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2025)09-2517-09

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (9193 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This study focuses on the plasma spectroscopy phenomena during the Laser Shock Peening (LSP) process, aiming to explore the correlation between spectral characteristics and surface integrity. It proposes an online monitoring method based on plasma spectroscopy to enable intelligent monitoring of the LSP process. First, the parameters of the plasma spectroscopy acquisition system are introduced, followed by a detailed analysis of the plasma characteristics during LSP. Using the Boltzmann two-line method with N Ⅱ 500.515 nm and N Ⅱ 399.5 nm spectral lines, the apparent plasma temperature is estimated to range between 16 000 and 22 000 K. Additionally, the electron density, calculated using the Hα 656.27 nm spectral line, is approximatelyin the range of 2.287 to 3.612×10¹⁶ cm^-3. As the laser power density increases, both plasma temperature and electron density exhibit an overall increasing trend. However, fluctuations are observed due to the inherent spatiotemporal instability of the LSP process.Subsequently, the study investigates the strengthening effects of LSP on the surface integrity of γ-TiAl alloy. Experimental findings show that as the laser power density increases, the surface residual stress rises from an initial value of -61.498 to -444.224 MPa, while the surface Vickers hardness improves from 317.8 to 385.5 HV. Based on these experimental data, polynomial fitting models are developed to predict surface residual stress and Vickers hardness, using the intensity ratio of the Hα line and the N Ⅱ 500. 515 nm line as independent variables. Both models achieve determination coefficients (R²) exceeding 90%, providing a reliable foundation for quantitative predictions of surface integrity. To enable efficient online monitoring, the study proposes an end-to-end monitoring method based on a CNN-Transformer deep learning architecture. By processing plasma spectroscopy data, the model performs monitoring of the LSP process. Experimental results demonstrate a classification accuracy of 99.3%, highlighting the approach's efficiency and reliability for online monitoring. In conclusion, by integrating physical modeling and deep learning techniques, this study establishes the correlation between plasma spectroscopy and surface integrity during the LSP process, providing an innovative and reliable approach for intelligent online monitoring of LSP.

Key words：Laser shock peening; Plasma spectroscopy; Online monitoring; Surface integrity

Received: 2025-01-23 Accepted: 2025-05-28

ZTFLH:

O657.3

Corresponding Authors: WANG Yuan-bin E-mail: wang.yuanbin@nwpu.edu.cn

Cite this article:

SHI Guang-yuan,WANG Yuan-bin,WANG Ying-hao, et al. Online Monitoring for Surface Integrity of γ-TiAl in Laser Shock Peening Based on Plasma Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(09): 2517-2525.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2025)09-2517-09 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2025/V45/I09/2517

[1] ZHOU Yuan-hang，FENG Ai-xin，WEI Peng-yu，et al（周远航，冯爱新，韦朋余，等）. Surface Technology（表面技术），2024，53（13）：75.
[2] Fan T，Yao C，Tan L，et al. Journal of Manufacturing Processes，2024，118：215.
[3] Kattoura M，Mannava S R，Qian D，et al. International Journal of Fatigue，2017，102：121.
[4] Zhang Z，Qin R，Li G，et al. Journal of Materials Processing Technology，2022，303：117515.
[5] Wu J，Liu X，Zhao J，et al. Optik，2019，183：1151.
[6] CAO Yu-peng，FENG Ai-xin，HUA Guo-ran（曹宇鹏，冯爱新，花国然）. Applied Laser（应用激光），2015，35（3）：324.
[7] Davis B，Mcclain R D，Suh U W，et al. Real Time Laser Shock Peening Quality Assurance by Natural Frequency Analysis[P]. U. S. Patent，6914215. 2005.
[8] DING Jie，ZHANG Da-cheng，WANG Bo-wen，et al（丁捷，张大成，王博文，等）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis（光谱学与光谱分析），2021，41（2）：606.
[9] Cui M，Shi G，Deng L，et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry，2024，39（5）：1361.
[10] Moreno-Diaz C，Alonso-Medina A，Colón C，et al. Journal of Materials Processing Technology，2016，232：9.
[11] Zhou J，Qi Q，Liu Q，et al. Thin-Walled Structures，2024，200：111862.
[12] Kramida A，Ralchenko Y，Reader J. NIST Atomic Spectra Database（version 5.6.1），National Institute of Standards and Technology，Gaithersburg，MD，2019.
[13] DUAN Yi-xiang，LIN Qing-yu（段忆翔，林庆宇）. Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Analysis Technology and Its Appication(激光诱导击穿光谱分析技术及其应用)[M]. Beijing：Science Press（北京：科学出版社），2016.
[14] Griem H R. Plasma Spectroscopy[M]. McGraw-Hill，New York，1964.
[15] Fujimoto T，McWhirter R W P. Physical Review A，1990，42（11）：6588.
[16] Zhou J，Zhang Z，Liu C，et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology，2025，137: 1405.
[17] Bashir T，Wang H，Tahir M，et al. Renewable Energy，2025，239：122055.
[18] Vaswani A，Shazeer N，Parmar N，et al. Attention is All You Need[C]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems，2017.
[19] Gillioz A，Casas J，Mugellini E，et al. Overview of the Transformer-Based Models for NLP Taks[C]. 2020 15th Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS)，IEEE，2020：179.
[20] Acheampong F A，Nunoo-Mensah H，Chen W. Artificial Intelligence Review，2021，54（8）: 5789.