黄河流域典型水库溶解性有机质的荧光光谱特征

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2025)07-2093-08

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (11150 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Xiaolangdi Reservoir is the largest hydraulic engineering project in the Yellow River Basin, and the annual water-sediment regulation can reduce siltation in the downstream river. However, reservoir storage will change the hydrodynamic conditions of the river. Exploring the differences in the spectral characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) before and after reservoir storage is crucial to reveal the changes in the aquatic ecosystem of the Yellow River Basin. In 2021, water samples were collected before, during, and after the water-sediment regulation period. The characteristics of the change in DOM fluorescence spectral parameters in the reservoir were analyzed. The DOM components and their sources were resolved using three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy coupled with the parallel factor method. Combined with the water quality parameters of the water body, the key factors affecting the changes in DOM fluorescence characteristics in the reservoir were elucidated by correlation analysis and redundancy analysis (RDA). Results indicated that (1) the fluorescence index and humification index of DOM did not change remarkably in all periods. The DOM of the reservoir water body was characterized by strong authigenicity and weak humification. During the water-sediment regulation, the authigenic index and freshness index of DOM decreased remarkably, and the newly authigenic DOM produced by microbial activities and other activities decreased in the reservoir area. (2) Four fluorescent components were resolved in the DOM of the Xiaolangdi Reservoir. Differences in the composition of the components were observed in different periods. The C1 and C2 components were humus-like substances, and the C3 and C4 components were protein-like in the non-water-sediment regulation period. On the contrary, the C1, C2, and C3 components were humus-like substances, and the C4 component was a protein-like substance in the water-sediment regulation period. Reservoir DOM before water-sediment regulation was dominated by protein-like substances (52.95%). The exogenous DOM entered the water body because of reservoir drainage and sediment discharge during the regulation period, which led to a remarkable increase in the proportion of humus-like substances (78.53%). The proportion of humus-like substances after water-sediment regulation was 58.80%. (3) Correlation analysis showed that water temperature (WT), flow, and sand content were the main factors influencing the source of DOM in Xiaolangdi Reservoir. During the non-water-sediment regulation period, DOM concentration was mainly affected by the exogenous input of humus-like substances. The degradation of tyrosine components may be related to pH and electrical conductivity(EC). RDA found that pH, WT, and EC were the main environmental factors affecting the differences in DOM fractions in different periods. The results of this study can provide basic data for the study of the fluorescence characteristics of DOM in the Yellow River Basin reservoirs, as well as the scientific basis for further revealing the influence of water body disturbance on the carbon cycle in the Yellow River Basin.

Key words：Reservoir; Dissolved organic matter; Three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy; Water-sediment regulation

Received: 2024-10-31 Accepted: 2025-03-14

ZTFLH:

X524

Corresponding Authors: ZHAO Tong-qian E-mail: zhaotq69@163.com

Cite this article:

WU Li,CHANG Miao,LAI Meng-yuan, et al. Fluorescence Spectral Characteristics of Dissolved Organic Matter in Typical Reservoirs in the Yellow River Basin[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(07): 2093-2100.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2025)07-2093-08 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2025/V45/I07/2093

[1] JIANG Xin-tong, XIAO Qi-tao, LI Yi-min, et al(蒋昕桐, 肖启涛, 李一民, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2023, 43(5): 1636.
[2] Liu H N, Du Y, Shi Z Y, et al. Chemosphere, 2023, 341: 140037.
[3] Rodríguez-Vidal F J, García-Valverde M, Ortega-Azabache B, et al. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 263: 110396.
[4] WANG Shi-huan, SHI Xiao-hong, ZHAO Sheng-nan, et al(王世欢, 史小红, 赵胜男, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2024, 45(11): 6574.
[5] Bao Y, Huang T, Ning C W, et al. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2023, 124: 769.
[6] LI Xiao-song, LI Wen-ying, WANG Yu, et al(李晓松, 李文英, 王宇, 等). Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报), 2024, 44(11): 215.
[7] Chen J B, Liu M, Wang F Y, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 912: 168614.
[8] He D, Wang K, Pang Y, et al. Water Research, 2020, 187: 116413.
[9] ZHOU Shi-lei, SUN Yue, YUAN Shi-chao, et al(周石磊, 孙悦, 苑世超, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2020, 41(6): 2635.
[10] Liu S M, Li L W, Zhang G L, et al. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, 430: 103.
[11] GAO Shu-ming, YAO Ai-lin, MING Yue, et al(高书铭, 姚爱林, 明玥, 等). Advances in Marine Science(海洋科学进展), 2024, 42(4): 753.
[12] WANG Bin, HUANG Ting-lin, LI Nan, et al(王斌, 黄廷林, 李楠, 等). China Environmental Science(中国环境科学), 2022, 42(3): 1309.
[13] HUANG Ting-lin, FANG Kai-kai, ZHANG Chun-hua, et al(黄廷林, 方开凯, 张春华, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2016, 37(9): 3394.
[14] GAO Jing-tian, TANG Shi-ke, LIU Wen-li, et al(高静湉, 汤世科, 刘文理, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2025, 46(4): 2154.
[15] LU Song, JIANG Tao, ZHANG Jin-zhong, et al(卢松, 江韬, 张进忠, 等). China Environmental Science(中国环境科学), 2015, 35(2): 516.
[16] XU Zhi-hui, LIU Dao-fang, LU Xin(许志辉, 刘道芳, 卢欣). Yellow River(人民黄河), 2020, 42(4): 144.
[17] LIANG Jian, JIANG Tao, WEI Shi-qiang, et al(梁俭, 江韬, 魏世强, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2015, 36(3): 888.
[18] ZHANG Xin-yuan, LI Yan, WEI Dan, et al(张新源, 李艳, 魏丹, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2023, 43(6): 1921.
[19] Guo X J, He L S, Li Q, et al. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 62: 93.
[20] Zeng Z, Zheng P, Ding A Q, et al. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(7): 6770.
[21] ZHU Yong-heng, BAI Yu-peng(朱永恒, 白钰鹏). Chinese Journal of Soil Science(土壤通报), 2021, 52(6): 1486.
[22] WU Li, SONG Bai-hui, YANG Meng, et al(武俐, 宋百惠, 杨萌, 等). Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报), 2023, 43(3): 216.
[23] XUE Shuang, HONG Yue, LIU Ying, et al(薛爽, 洪悦, 刘影, 等). Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报), 2017, 37(4): 1330.
[24] HE Jiang-yi, ZHANG Dong, ZHAO Zhi-qi(何姜毅, 张东, 赵志琦). Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 2017, 36(5): 1390.
[25] Zhang Q Q, Jin Z D, Zhang F, et al. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2015, 156: 101.
[26] DAI Qian, SHAN Hong-xian, CUI Wen-lin, et al(戴茜, 单红仙, 崔文林, 等). Acta Oceanologica Sinica(海洋学报), 2011, 33(4): 88.
[27] LI Qi-jun, YAO Yan-ming, JIAO Jian-ge, et al(李奇骏, 姚炎明, 焦建格, 等). Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science)[浙江大学学报(工学版)], 2020, 54(9): 1858.
[28] ZHANG Tao, LI Ying-zhi, CAI Wu-tian, et al(张涛, 李颖智, 蔡五田, 等). Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment(干旱区资源与环境), 2018, 32(4): 126.
[29] CHEN Yong-can, FU Jian, LIU Zhao-wei, et al(陈永灿, 付健, 刘昭伟, 等). Advances in Water Science(水科学进展), 2009, 20(4): 526.
[30] Song K S, Wen Z D, Shang Y X, et al. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 217: 391.
[31] YE Lin-lin, WU Xiao-dong, LIU Bo, et al(叶琳琳, 吴晓东, 刘波, 等). Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报), 2022, 42(7): 338.