氨基酸对腐殖酸非生物合成的影响研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2025)06-1612-10

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (11092 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The process by which organic matter is transformed and polymerized into humus through biological or chemical conversion is called humification. Both biological and abiotic pathways can drive this process. The abiotic pathway offers several advantages, including environmental friendliness, excellent catalytic performance, and controllable reaction conditions. It plays an important role in enhancing soil fertility, regulating pollutants, and improving compost quality. However, because microorganisms in compost are the primary driving force for organic matter transformation and play a dominant role, the abiotic pathway is often overlooked. Amino acids are the core structural components of humic acid substances and act as precursor substances in the abiotic pathway, participating in the phenolic protein and Maillard systems, and promoting the polymerization of small organic monomer molecules to form humic acid substances. Previous studies have shown that the formation of humus generally requires the participation of amino acids in the synthesis reaction, continuously condensing to form large molecular polymers. However, the effects of different amino acid types and concentrations on abiotic humification remain unclear. Therefore, in this study, catechol and glucose were used as the reaction substrates for the phenolic protein pathway and the Maillard pathway, respectively. The extraction solutions of the reaction products were analyzed by ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy and three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy. The aim was to elucidate the mechanism of amino acid precursor substances on the abiotic formation of humic acid and to investigate the effects of various types and concentrations of amino acids on the humification process. The results showed that at the end of the reaction, the concentration of humic acid-like substances (HLA) in the phenolic protein theoretical system with lysine participation was the highest, reaching 120 mg·L^-1. In the Maillard systems with different amino acids, only the tryptophan addition system showed accumulation of HLA, indicating that aromatic amino acids are conducive to the direct synthesis of humic acid-like substances in the Maillard system. Ultraviolet-visible absorption spectroscopy and three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy indicated that lysine made a greater contribution to the aromatization degree of humic acid in the abiotic synthesis pathway. With the increase in lysine concentration, the content of fulvic acid-like substances (FLA) in each abiotic humic acid formation system also increased. When the lysine concentration was 0.025 and 0.05 mol·L^-1, HLA was produced in the phenolic protein system at 24 hours into the reaction. Under the same lysine concentration, the Maillard theoretical pathway had the highest FLA content at the end of the reaction. In contrast, the phenolic protein system yielded the highest HLA and had the highest humic-to-fulvic acid ratio (DP). A comprehensive analysis indicated that the phenolic protein system had a more effective impact on the abiotic synthesis of humic acid compared to the Maillard system. This study revealed the influence of amino acid types and concentrations on the humification process of compost, providing theoretical support for further regulating the degree of compost humification and enhancing the synthesis of humic acid under the phenolic-protein theory.

Key words：Humification; Amino acid types; Amino acid concentration; Ultraviolet spectrum; Three-dimensional fluorescence spectrum

Received: 2024-08-22 Accepted: 2025-01-09

ZTFLH:

O657.3

Corresponding Authors: WEI Yu-quan E-mail: weiyq2019@cau.edu.cn

Cite this article:

KANG Zi-tong,ZHANG Sa-sa,JIAO Zi-wei, et al. Effect of Amino Acids on Abiotic Synthesis of Humic Acid[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(06): 1612-1621.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2025)06-1612-10 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2025/V45/I06/1612

[1] Kang K H, Shin H S, Park H. Water Research, 2002, 36(16): 4023.
[2] Wu J, Yao W, Zhao L, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 363: 132470.
[3] Zhu N, Zhu Y, Liang D, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 315: 128211.
[4] Spaccini R, Cozzolino V, Di Meo V, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 646: 792.
[5] WEI, Zi-min, WU Jun-qiu, ZHAO Yue, et al(魏自民，吴俊秋，赵越, 等). Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology(环境工程技术学报), 2016, 6(4): 377.
[6] Tan M, Parkin J E. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2000, 208(1-2): 23.
[7] Tan K H. Humic Matter in Soil and the Environment: Principles and Controversies: CRC Press, 2003.
[8] Fukushima M, Miura A, Sasaki M, et al. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2009, 917(2-3): 142.
[9] Nishimoto R, Fukuchi S, Qi G, et al. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2013, 418: 117.
[10] Bianco A, Minella M, De Laurentiis E, et al. Chemosphere, 2014, 111: 529.
[11] Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Yang T, et al. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 291: 121882.
[12] Reemtsma T, These A, Springer A, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(19): 5839.
[13] LUAN Fu-bo，XIE Li，LI Jun, et al(栾富波，谢丽，李俊, 等). Chemical Bulletin(化学通报), 2008, 71(11): 833.
[14] Zhou X, Li J, Zhang J, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 830: 154783.
[15] Fu M, Cao Z, Sun R, et al. Bioresource Technology, 2023, 380: 129125.
[16] Chang Chien S W, Chen H L, Wang M C, et al. Chemosphere, 2009, 74(8): 1125.
[17] Wang M, Li Y, Peng H, et al. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2023, 187: 113771.
[18] Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer J A, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(24): 5701.
[19] JIN Wujisiguleng，XUE Shuang, WANG Zhi, et al(金乌吉斯古楞, 薛爽，王智，等). Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报), 2014, 34(9): 2298.
[20] Mu D, Wang C, Geng X, et al. Chemosphere, 2024, 353: 141560.
[21] Li Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, et al. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 2024, 30(9): 312.
[22] GUAN Qin-hao，TANG Li-hua，ZHANG Liang-liang, et al(管勤昊，汤丽华，张亮亮, 等). Food Research & Development(食品研究与开发), 2023, 44(23): 182.