|
|
|
|
|
|
Study on the Factors Affecting the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Two-Photon Optical Frequency Standard Spectral Lines Based on Rubidium Atom |
ZHANG Jiong-yang1, ZHAI Hao1, 2*, XIAO Yu-hua1*, WANG Ji1*, DAI Hu1, CHEN Jiang1 |
1. National Key Laboratory on Vacuum Technology and Physics, Lanzhou Institute of Physics, Lanzhou 730000, China
2. School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China
|
|
|
Abstract The optical frequency standard based on two-photon transition is expected to become a miniaturized optical atomic clock available in the future. Acquiring spectral lines with a high signal-to-noise ratio is an important prerequisite for achieving high-performance optical frequency standards. The experimental setup of the two-photon transition optical frequency standard was completed. The factors affecting the signal-to-noise ratio of the optical frequency standard spectral line were experimentally analyzed from the aspects of laser intensity, atomic density, and the gain of the photomultiplier tube, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the optical frequency standard transition spectral line under different parameter values was obtained. Experimental results show that the spectral line's signal-to-noise ratio increases linearly with the increase of the laser intensity in the range of 15 700 mW·mm-2.When the atomicitydensity reaches 1.5×1013 cm-3 and the PMT gain is 1.2×105, the signal-to-noise ratio of the spectral line reaches saturation. The signal-to-noise ratio of the spectral line of the two-photon transition optical frequency standard obtained by this setup can reach up to 2600. Considering that the linewidth of the two-photon transition spectral line is 1MHz, the short-term frequency stability of the optical frequency standard is expected to reach 3×10-13τ-1/2. By studying the factors affecting the signal-to-noise ratio of two-photon optical frequency standard spectral lines based on Rubidium atoms, the atomic transition spectral line with a high signal-to-noise ratio is obtained, which is of great significance for the development of high-performance and integrated two-photon optical frequency standards.
|
Received: 2024-12-25
Accepted: 2025-02-24
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHAI Hao, XIAO Yu-hua, WANG Ji
E-mail: 2692244353@qq.com;yhxiao2004@sina.com;20138295@qq.com
|
|
[1] Biraben F, Cagnac B, Grynberg G. Physical Review Letters, 1974, 32 (12): 643.
[2] Grynberg G, Cagnac B. Reports on Progress in Physics, 1977, 40(7): 791.
[3] Callejo M, Mursa A, Vicarini R, et al. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 2024, 42(1): 151.
[4] Newman Z L, Maurice V, Drake T, et al. Optica, 2019, 6(5): 680.
[5] Maurice V, Newman Z L, Dickerson S, et al. Optics Express, 2020, 28(17): 24708.
[6] Kristen Cote, Shira Jackson, Ryan Zazo, et al. The Stratospheric Optical Rubidium Clock Experiment[C]. 70th International Astronautical Congress, 2019: 19-A2.1.3.
[7] Quinn T J. Metrologia, 2003, 40(2): 103.
[8] Jaduszliwer B, Camparo J. GPS Solutions, 2021, 25(1): 27.
[9] Leng J, Xu H, Lu H, et al. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 2019, 36(5): 1183.
[10] Vutha A. New Journal of Physics, 2015, 17(6): 063030.
[11] Nez F, Biraben F, Felder R, et al. Optics Communication, 1993, 102(5-6): 432.
[12] Martin K W, Phelps G, Lemke N D, et al. Physical Review Applied, 2018, 9(1): 014019.
[13] Locke C, Ng S, Scarabel J, et al. Portable Optical Atomic Clock Based on a Dichroic Two-Photon Transition in Rubidium[C]. 2023 Joint Conference of the European Frequency and Time Forum and IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFCS), 2023.
[14] Perrella C, Light P, Anstie J, et al. Physical Review Applied, 2019, 12(5): 054063.
[15] Lemke N D, Martin K W, Beard R, et al. Sensors, 2022, 22(5): 1982.
[16] Lemke N D, Phelps G, Burke J H, et al. The Optical Rubidium Atomic Frequency Standard at AFRL[C]. 2017 Joint Conference of the European Frequency and Time Forum and IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFCS), 2017: 466.
[17] Li D, Liu K, Wang P, et al. Optics Express, 2024, 32(2): 2766.
[18] MENG Yi-ming, XIANG Jing-feng, XU Bin, et al(孟一鸣, 项静峰, 徐 斌, 等). Chinese Journal of Lasers(中国激光), 2023, 50(23): 2301013.
[19] Wu J, Hou D, Qin Z, et al. Physical Review A, 2014, 89(4): 041402.
[20] ZHANG Jiong-yang, ZHAI Hao, WANG Ji, et al(张炯阳, 翟 浩, 王 骥, 等). Chinese Optics[中国光学(中英文)], 2024(网络首发).
[21] Zhang Y, Fan H. Laser Physics, 2024, 34(7): 075701.
[22] Riehle F. Frequency Standards: Basics and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
[23] Cheng B, Wang Z Y, Wu B, et al. Chinese Physics B, 2014, 23(10): 104222.
[24] Deng K, Guo T, Su J, et al. Physics Letters A, 2009, 373(12-13): 1130.
[25] Baryshev V N, Aleynikov M S, Osipenko G V, et al. Quantum Electronics, 2018, 48(5): 443.
[26] Boudot R, Liu X, Abbe P, et al. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, Frequency Control, 2012, 59(11): 2584.
[27] Demtröder W. Laser Spectroscopy: Vol.2 Experimental Techniques. Springer-Verlag, 2008.
[28] Steck D A. “Rubidium 87 D Line Data”, available online at http://steck.us/alkalidata(revision 2.3.3, 28 May 2024).
[29] BIPM. Recommended Values of Standard Frequencies. https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/mises-en-pratique/standard-frequencies. |
[1] |
WANG Shuo1, 2, XIE Zhen-kun1, 2, WEI Zhi-peng1*. DMD-Based Hadamard Transform Near-Infrared Spectrometer Design and Implementation of Fast Processing System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(01): 133-138. |
[2] |
WANG Xiao-min1, GAO Jun-ping1*, PU Yuan2*, QIU Bo1*, ZHANG Jian-nan3, YAN Jing1, LI Rong1. The “Unknown” Spectral Classification Study of LAMOST:
ODS-YOLOv7 Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(07): 1960-1967. |
[3] |
PAN Ke-yu1, 2, ZHU Ming-yao1, 2, WANG Yi-meng1, 2, XU Yang1, CHI Ming-bo1, 2*, WU Yi-hui1, 2*. Research on the Influence of Modulation Depth of Phase Sensitive
Detection on Stimulated Raman Signal Intensity and
Signal-to-Noise Ratio[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1068-1074. |
[4] |
LIU Ye-kun, HAO Xiao-jian*, YANG Yan-wei, HAO Wen-yuan, SUN Peng, PAN Bao-wu. Quantitative Analysis of Soil Heavy Metal Elements Based on Cavity
Confinement LIBS Combined With Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2387-2391. |
[5] |
WANG Yue1, 3, 4, CHEN Nan1, 2, 3, 4, WANG Bo-yu1, 5, LIU Tao1, 3, 4*, XIA Yang1, 2, 3, 4*. Fourier Transform Near-Infrared Spectral System Based on Laser-Driven Plasma Light Source[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1666-1673. |
[6] |
YANG Yu-qing1, CAI Jiang-hui1, 2*, YANG Hai-feng1*, ZHAO Xu-jun1, YIN Xiao-na1. LAMOST Unknown Spectral Analysis Based on Influence Space and Data Field[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1186-1191. |
[7] |
HU Li-hong1, ZHANG Jin-tong1, WANG Li-yun2, ZHOU Gang3, WANG Jiang-yong1*, XU Cong-kang1*. Optimization of Working Parameters of Glow Discharge Optical Emission Spectrometry of High Barrier Aluminum Plastic Film[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 954-960. |
[8] |
CUI Fang-xiao1, ZHAO Yue2, MA Feng-xiang2, WU Jun1*, WANG An-jing1, LI Da-cheng1, LI Yang-yu1. Optimization of FTIR Passive Remote Sensing Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Its Application in SF6 Leak Detection in Transform Substation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(05): 1436-1440. |
[9] |
WANG Jing-jing1, 2, TAN Tu1*, WANG Gui-shi1, ZHU Gong-dong1, XUE Zheng-yue1, 2, LI Jun1, 2, LIU Xiao-hai1, 2, GAO Xiao-ming1, 2. Research on All-Fiber Dual-Channel Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases Laser Heterodyne Detection Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(02): 354-359. |
[10] |
SUN Ran, HAO Xiao-jian*, YANG Yan-wei, REN Long. Effect of Cavity Confinement Materials on Laser-Induced Breakdown Cu Plasma Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(12): 3801-3805. |
[11] |
ZHENG Guo-liang, ZHU Hong-qiu*, LI Yong-gang. Spectral Signal Denoising Algorithm Based on Improved LMS[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(02): 643-649. |
[12] |
LI Zhi-wei1, 2, SHI Hai-liang1, 2, LUO Hai-yan1, 2, XIONG Wei1, 2*. Study on the Relationship Between Apodization Function and Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Hyperspectral Spatial Interferogram[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(01): 29-33. |
[13] |
XIAO Hu-ying1, YANG Fan1, XIANG Liu1, HU Xue-jiao2*. Jet Vacuum Enhanced Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(10): 2993-2997. |
[14] |
YI Li-na1, XU Xiao1, ZHANG Gui-feng2,3*, MING Xing2, GUO Wen-ji2, LI Shao-cong1, SHA Ling-yu1. Light and Small UAV Hyperspectral Image Mosaicking[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(06): 1885-1891. |
[15] |
ZHAO Zhe1, 2, 3, WANG Hui1, WANG Hui-quan1, 2, 3*, HE Xin-wei1, MIAO Jing-hong1, 2, WANG Jin-hai1, 2*. Influence of Spectral Characteristics on the Accuracy of Concentration Quantitatively Analysis by NIR[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1070-1074. |
|
|
|
|