光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimation of Organic Matter Content of North Fluvo-Aquic Soil Based on the Coupling Model of Wavelet Transform and Partial Least Squares |
WANG Yan-cang1, 2, 3, YANG Gui-jun2, 3, ZHU Jin-shan1, GU Xiao-he2, 3*, XU Peng2, LIAO Qin-hong2 |
1. College of Geometrics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qindao 266590, China 2. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China 3. Key Laboratory of Information Technology in Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China |
|
|
Abstract For improving the estimation accuracy of soil organic matter content of the north fluvo-aquic soil, wavelet transform technology is introduced. The soil samples were collected from Tongzhou district and Shunyi district in Beijing city. And the data source is from soil hyperspectral data obtained under laboratory condition. First, discrete wavelet transform efficiently decomposes hyperspectral into approximate coefficients and detail coefficients. Then, the correlation between approximate coefficients, detail coefficients and organic matter content was analyzed, and the sensitive bands of the organic matter were screened. Finally, models were established to estimate the soil organic content by using the partial least squares regression (PLSR). Results show that the NIR bands made more contributions than the visible band in estimating organic matter content models; the ability of approximate coefficients to estimate organic matter content is better than that of detail coefficients; The estimation precision of the detail coefficients fir soil organic matter content decreases with the spectral resolution being lower; Compared with the commonly used three types of soil spectral reflectance transforms, the wavelet transform can improve the estimation ability of soil spectral fir organic content; The accuracy of the best model established by the approximate coefficients or detail coefficients is higher, and the coefficient of determination (R2) and the root mean square error (RMSE) of the best model for approximate coefficients are 0.722 and 0.221, respectively. The R2 and RMSE of the best model for detail coefficients are 0.670 and 0.255, respectively.
|
Received: 2013-08-30
Accepted: 2013-12-02
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
GU Xiao-he
E-mail: guxh@nercita.org.cn
|
|
[1] LIU Yan-xuan, BAI Hui-dong, JIANG Gui-ying(刘焱选, 白慧东, 蒋桂英). Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin(中国农学通报),2007, 23(7): 577. [2] Liu H J, Zhang Y Z, Zhang B, et al. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2009, 154: 147. [3] JI Wen-jun, SHI Zhou, ZHOU Qing, et al(纪文君, 史 舟, 周 清, 等). Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves(近红外与毫米波学报). 2012, 31(3): 277. [4] HE Ting, WANG Jing, LIN Zong-jian, et al(何 挺, 王 静, 林宗坚,等). Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University(武汉大学学报·信息科学版), 2006, 31(11): 975. [5] Viscarra Rossela R A, Chappella A, de Caritatb P, et al. European Journal of Soil Science, 2011, 62, 442. [6] Roberts D F, Adamchuk V I, Shanahan J F, et al. Precision Agric., 2011, 12: 82. [7] CHEN Hong-yan, ZHAO Geng-xing, LI Xi-can, et al(陈红艳, 赵庚星, 李希灿,等). Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学),2012, 45(7): 1425. [8] LI Rui-ping,SHI Hai-bin, ZHANG Xiao-hong, et al(李瑞平, 史海滨, 张晓红,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报),2012, 6(3): 82. [9] ZHAO Ze-hai, ZU Yuan-gang, CONG Pei-tong(赵则海, 祖元刚, 丛沛桐). Ecological Society of China(生态学报),2002, 22(10): 1660. [10] XU Yong-ming, LIN Qi-zhong, WANG Lu, et al(徐永明, 蔺启忠, 王 璐, 等). Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报), 2006, 43(5): 709. [11] Daubechies I. Ten Lectures on Wavelets, Siam, 1992. [12] Burrus C S, Gopinath R A, Guo H. Introduction to Wavelets and Wavelet Transforms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997. [13] Jahn B R, Brooksby P A, Upadhyaya S K. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2005, 48(6): 2065.
|
[1] |
LEI Hong-jun1, YANG Guang1, PAN Hong-wei1*, WANG Yi-fei1, YI Jun2, WANG Ke-ke2, WANG Guo-hao2, TONG Wen-bin1, SHI Li-li1. Influence of Hydrochemical Ions on Three-Dimensional Fluorescence
Spectrum of Dissolved Organic Matter in the Water Environment
and the Proposed Classification Pretreatment Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 134-140. |
[2] |
LI Yu1, ZHANG Ke-can1, PENG Li-juan2*, ZHU Zheng-liang1, HE Liang1*. Simultaneous Detection of Glucose and Xylose in Tobacco by Using Partial Least Squares Assisted UV-Vis Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 103-110. |
[3] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[4] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[5] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[6] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[7] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[8] |
YANG Ke-li1, 2, PENG Jiao-yu1, 2, DONG Ya-ping1, 2*, LIU Xin1, 2, LI Wu1, 3, LIU Hai-ning1, 3. Spectroscopic Characterization of Dissolved Organic Matter Isolated From Solar Pond[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3775-3780. |
[9] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[10] |
CUI Song1, 2, BU Xin-yu1, 2, ZHANG Fu-xiang1, 2. Spectroscopic Characterization of Dissolved Organic Matter in Fresh Snow From Harbin[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3937-3945. |
[11] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[12] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[13] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[14] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[15] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
|
|
|
|