Accumulative Fluorescence Emission Spectra Combing Multivariate Statistics to Study the Characteristics of DOM in Moguhu Lake
ZHANG Guang-cai1, 2, YU Hui-bin2, XU Ze-hua1, HAN Mei1, SONG Yong-hui2*
1. School of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Ji’nan 250014, China
2. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Abstract：This study takes the DOM of the Moguhu Lake water as an example, based on accumulative emission spectra (AFEs), combined with multivariate statistics and second derivative, to characterize the various fluorescent components and content of DOM. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to analyze the factor loading of AFEs and to determine the difference between the types of fluorescent peaks and their contents. The second derivative AFEs are obtained by AFEs through second derivative conversion. Analysis of the content and variation of each component in DOM by absolute area integration of the fluorescence peaks of the second derivative AFEs of all sampling points. Cluster analysis was used to analyze the difference or similarity of DOM components at different points. Studies have shown that five types of fluorescent peaks are obtained by AFEs, namely protein-like peaks, fulvic acid-like peaks, marine or terrestrial humic acid peaks, and humic acid peaks. Based on the analysis of the AFEs and sum of fluorescence intensity, it can be seen that the DOM in the water of the Moguhu Lake is mainly unstable, easily degraded, and the protein with less molecular weight and fulvic acid. The degree of humification of its DOM is reduced from the lakeside area to the deep lake area. According to the AFEs score map, five types of fluorescent peaks are obtained, and the protein-like and fulvic acid-like peaks in the fluorescent peak are the main ones. Based on the point-score matrix, it can be explained that there is a difference in the fluorescence components between the points. The second derivative AFEs are divided into five fluorescent bands. The DOM is mainly composed of organic matter with small molecular mass, and the degree of humification and aromaticity are small, and the spatial difference is not significant. By clustering the fluorescence peak area and sampling points, the fluorescence peaks are divided into three categories, of which fulvic acid content is relatively large, and there is a difference between the shore sampling point and the sampling point located in the lake center area. In summary, AFEs are relatively simple and rapid, and can be used to characterize DOM instead of 3DEEM. The DOM in the water of the Moguhu Lake is mainly composed of protein-like and fulvic acid-like substances with relatively low molecular weight, instability and easy degradation. In general, the degree of humification and relative molecular mass have a tendency to decrease from the lakeside area to the deep lake area, but the spatial difference is small.
Key words：Dissolved organic matter (DOM); Accumulative fluorescence emission spectra; Second derivative spectrum; Multivariate statistical analysis; Moguhu Lake
张广彩，于会彬，徐泽华，韩 美，宋永会. 累积性发射光谱结合多元统计研究蘑菇湖水体DOM的特征[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2019, 39(09): 2873-2878.
ZHANG Guang-cai, YU Hui-bin, XU Ze-hua, HAN Mei, SONG Yong-hui. Accumulative Fluorescence Emission Spectra Combing Multivariate Statistics to Study the Characteristics of DOM in Moguhu Lake. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(09): 2873-2878.
[1] Cilenti A, Provenzano M R, Senesi N. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2005, 3(2): 53.
[2] Heather E Reader, Colin A Stedman, Nikoline J Nielsen, et al. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2015, 2: 88.
[3] WANG Li-ying, ZHANG Run-yu, WU Feng-chang(王立英，张润宇，吴丰昌). Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志)，2014，33（12）：3416.
[4] Xu P, Zhu J, Fu Q, et al. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 2018，18(5): 1865.
[5] Vázquez E, Ejarque E, Ylla I, et al. Freshwater Science, 2015, 34(1): 263.
[6] Guo X, Yu H, Yan Z, et al. Chemosphere, 2018, 194: 463.
[7] Hernández-Sánchez N, Lleó L, Ammari F, et al. Food & Bioprocess Technology, 2017，10(5): 949.
[8] Osburn C L, Handsel L T, Mikan M P, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(16): 8628.
[9] Guo X J, Yuan D H, Jiang J Y, et al. Spectrochimical Acta Part A Molecular & Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2013, 104(3): 280.
[10] ZHANG Hua, QUAN Gui-jun, HUANG Jian, et al(张 华, 全桂军, 黄 健, 等). Environmental Science and Technology(环境科学与技术), 2017，(10): 157.
[11] Hao R, Ren H, Li J, et al. Water Research, 2012, 46(17): 5765.
[12] CHEN Jun-yi, WANG Shu-hang, JIANG Xia, et al(陈俊伊, 王书航, 姜 霞, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2017, 38(1): 70.
[13] Coble P G. Chemical Reviews, 2007, 107(2): 402.
[14] Wei H, Jin H. Water Research, 2015, 83: 217.
[15] HUANG Ting-lin, FANG Kai-kai, ZHANG Chun-hua, et al(黄廷林, 方开凯, 张春华, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2016, 37(9): 3394.
[16] LI Shuai-dong, JIANG Quan-liang, LI Ye, et al(李帅东, 姜泉良, 黎 烨, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2017, 37(5): 1448.
[17] Yu H, Song Y, Tu X, et al. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 144(5): 595.
