Research on Inversion of Water Conservation Capacity of Forest Litter in Yarlung Zangbo Grand Canyon Based on Spectral Features
LONG Qian-qian1, ZHOU Ren-hao2, YUE De-peng1, NIU Teng1, MAO Xue-qing1, WANG Peng-chong3, YU Qiang1*
1. Beijing Key Research Office of Precision Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2. Cyberspace Security Academy, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610200, China
3. Beijing Linmiao Ecological Environment Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100085, China
Abstract：Water conservation is an important part of the ecosystem service function. As a complex ecosystem, forests have different contributions to water conservation. The forest litter plays an important role in the water conservation function, for it directly covers the ground surface. Remote sensing and hyperspectral technology provide a solution for the long-distance detection of water conservation in planar areas. Especially in plateau areas, remote sensing is the most effective way to obtain surface information. In this paper, the hyperspectral data of main tree species were measured by ASD spectrometer in the Grand Canyon research area of Yarlung Zangbo. The litter samples were obtained by sampling on the plot and the water holding capacity of the samples was calculated. Use leaf spectrum information to construct vegetation index related to litter water conservation capacity, then establish multiple regression model of vegetation index and effective retention capacity, and invert the water conservation capacity distribution of main tree species in the Grand Canyon based on Sentinel-2 images. In the end, the accuracy of the inversion model is evaluated based on the verification points. The results showed that: (1) The reflectance of Quercusaqui folioides was the highest, the lowest was the Picea Linzhi, and the total reflectance trend of the three species was similar; (2) The effective interception amount of litter is sorted from large to small as follows: Picea Linzhi (48.36 t·ha-1)>Quercusaqui folioides (39.24 t·ha-1)>Pinus densata (32.32 t·ha-1). Picea Linzhi leaves are easy to decompose and store, Quercusaqui folioides’ leathery leaves and Pinus densata’s oily leaves are not conducive to decomposition. Therefore, the litter of Picea Linzhi has the highest effective interception amount. (3) Through the Person correlation coefficient analysis and the multiple linear regression model, it is found that the higher the wax parameters and attenuation degree of leaves, the weaker the water conservation capacity of litter; the better the vegetation growth trend, the higher the pigment and the water content of leaves, the stronger the water conservation capacity. (4) The results of the accuracy evaluation of the inversion model of the water conservation capacity of litter are good. R2 of the test points of Pinus densata, Picea Linzhi and Quercusaqui folioides is 0.943, 0.815 and 0.812, and RMSE is 1.597, 2.270 and 1.953. It shows that the model can be used for the prediction and distribution of the water conservation capacity of forest litter in Grand Canyon.
Key words：Hyperspectral; Water conservation; Litter; Remote sensing inversion; Yarlung Zangbo Grand Canyon
龙芊芊，周仁浩，岳德鹏，牛 腾，毛雪晴，王朋冲，于 强. 基于光谱特征的雅鲁藏布大峡谷森林枯落物水源涵养能力反演研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2022, 42(01): 229-235.
LONG Qian-qian, ZHOU Ren-hao, YUE De-peng, NIU Teng, MAO Xue-qing, WANG Peng-chong, YU Qiang. Research on Inversion of Water Conservation Capacity of Forest Litter in Yarlung Zangbo Grand Canyon Based on Spectral Features. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 229-235.
[1] ZHANG Biao, LI Wen-hua, XIE Gao-di, et al(张 彪，李文华，谢高地，等). Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 2009, 28(3): 529.
[2] WU Qin-xiao, ZHAO Hong-yan, LIU Xiang-dong, et al(吴钦孝，赵鸿雁，刘向东，等). Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation(土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报), 1998，(2): 3.
[3] WEI Xiao-cha, ZHOU Qiu-wen, CUI Xing-fen, et al(韦小茶，周秋文，崔兴芬，等). Ecological Science(生态科学), 2017, 36(4): 120.
[4] ZHU Jin-zhao, LIU Jian-jun, ZHU Qing-ke, et al(朱金兆，刘建军，朱清科，等). Journal of Beijing Forestry University(北京林业大学学报), 2002，(z1): 30.
[5] Neris J, Tejedor M, Rodríguez, et al. Catena, 2013, 108: 50.
[6] Dabney S M. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 1998, 53(3): 207.
[7] Li Xiang, Niu Jianzhi, Xie Baoyuan. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8(7): e70328.
[8] LIU Yu, ZHANG Hong-jiang, ZHANG You-yan, et al(刘 宇，张洪江，张友焱，等). Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation(水土保持通报), 2013, 33(6): 69.
[9] DENG Ji-feng, DING Guo-dong, WU Bin, et al(邓继峰，丁国栋，吴 斌，等). Journal of Beijing Forestry University(北京林业大学学报), 2014, 36(2): 108.
[10] CHEN Li-qing, SUN Ze-ping, LI De-wen, et al(陈礼清，孙泽平，李德文，等). Resources and Environment of Yangtze River Basin(长江流域资源与环境), 2014, 23(7): 1048.
[11] HE Shu-qin, GONG Yuan-bo, ZHENG Zi-cheng(何淑勤，宫渊波，郑子成). Resources and Environment of Yangtze River Basin(长江流域资源与环境), 2020, 29(9): 1986.
[12] MA Jian-wei(马建威). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica(测绘学报), 2017, 46(5): 666.
