Field in Situ Spectral Inversion of Cotton Organic Matter Based on Soil Water Removal Algorithm
LUO De-fang1, LIU Wei-yang1*, PENG Jie1, FENG Chun-hui1, JI Wen-jun2, BAI Zi-jin1
1. College of Plant Sciences, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
2. College of Land Resources Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
Abstract：Field in-situ visible-near infrared spectroscopy (VIS-NIR) can effectively improve the detection efficiency of soil properties, but due to the influence of in-situ soil moisture factors, the prediction accuracy of soil property models is difficult to reach expectations. How to effectively remove the influence of soil moisture on the spectrum prediction of other soil properties is a difficult problem for using field in-situ spectroscopy to predict soil properties with high precision. It is also a breakthrough for soil spectroscopy technology to shift from indoor to field. The effective solution to this problem can eliminate the process of soil sample collection and indoor pretreatment, and achieve field in-situ spectroscopy of soil properties. In this study, a total of 115 surface soil samples of 0～20 cm were collected by using the grid sampling method in the cotton field of the 12th group in the Alar reclamation area in southern Xinjiang. And use the SR-3500 portable ground object spectrometer to collect 231 sample points of field in-situ spectral data. The soil samples are air-dried, ground and sieved, and then their indoor spectrum and organic matter content are measured. 115 soil samples were divided into two subsets, i.e. the conversion subset (69 samples) and the prediction set (46 samples), with the Kennard-Stone algorithm. The external parameter orthogonalization (EPO), spectral direct standardization (DS) and piece-wise spectral direct standardization (PDS) were performed on spectra and the spectra with other three pretreatments including first-order differential of reflectance (R′), logarithm of reflectance (LOG(R)) and inverse reflectance (1/R), respectively. The random forest (RF) model is used to construct different combination models and evaluate the accuracy. The results showed: (1) The higher the soil organic matter content, the lower the soil spectral reflectance. The in-situ spectral reflectance of soil in the field is lower than the indoor spectral reflectance of soil; (2) The correlation between indoor spectral reflectance and soil organic matter content is greater than that of field in-situ spectra. The correlation between indoor spectra and soil organic matter content is significantly improved after first-order differential transformation. (3) The prediction accuracy of the soil indoor spectral reflectance model (R2=0.86, RPD=2.08, RMSE=1.55 g·kg-1, MAPE=0.14) is higher than the field in-situ spectral reflectance model (R2=0.71, RPD=1.49, RMSE=2.17 g·kg-1, MAPE=0.20). Among the moisture removal algorithm models, the EPO first-order differential model has the best moisture removal effect, with the coefficient of determination R2 increased from 0.71 to 0.83, RPD increased from 1.49 to 2.04, RMSE decreased from 2.17 to 1.58 g·kg-1, and MAPE decreased from 0.20 to 0.14. This study achieved the removal of the influence of soil moisture factors, improved the accuracy of field in-situ spectroscopy prediction of soil organic matter, and provided important reference value for the prediction of large-scale soil organic matter and the evaluation of soil fertility in southern Xinjiang cotton fields.
Key words：Soil organic matter; External parameter orthogonalization (EPO); Direct standardization (DS); Segmented direct standardization (PDS); Random forest (RF)
罗德芳，柳维扬，彭 杰，冯春晖，纪文君，白子金. 土壤水分去除算法的田间原位光谱反演棉田有机质[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2022, 42(01): 222-228.
LUO De-fang, LIU Wei-yang, PENG Jie, FENG Chun-hui, JI Wen-jun, BAI Zi-jin. Field in Situ Spectral Inversion of Cotton Organic Matter Based on Soil Water Removal Algorithm. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 222-228.
[1] ZHANG Wei-li, Kolbe H, ZHANG Ren-lian, et al(张维理, Kolbe H, 张认连, 等). Chinese Agricultural Science (中国农业科学)，2020, 53(2): 332.
[2] Nawar S, Buddenbaum H, Hill J, et al. Soil and Tillage Research，2016, 155: 510.
[3] SHI Zhou, WANG Qian-long, PENG Jie, et al(史 舟, 王乾龙, 彭 杰, 等). Chinese Science: Earth Science(中国科学: 地球科学)，2014, 44(5): 978.
[4] Allory V, Cambou A, Moulin P, et al. Science of the Total Environment，2019, 686: 764.
[5] HONG Yong-sheng, YU Lei, ZHU Ya-xing, et al(洪永胜, 于 雷, 朱亚星, 等). Journal of Soil(土壤学报)，2017, 54(5): 1068.
[6] Ji W, Viscarra R R A, Shi Z. European Journal of Soil Science，2015, 66(3): 555.
[7] Peng J, Biswas A, Jiang Q S, et al. Geoderma，2019, 337: 1309.
[8] Liu Y, Deng C, Lu Y Y, et al. Geoderma，2020, 376: 114568.
[9] Wijewardane N K, Ge Y F, Morgan C L S. Geoderma, 2016, 267: 92.
[10] Ji W, Viscarra R R A, Shi Z. European Journal of Soil Science，2015, 66(4): 670.
[11] Zhang Y, Sui B, Shen H, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture，2019, 160: 23.
[12] Zhang X, Sun WC, Cen Y, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650: 321.
[13] WU Long-guo, WANG Song-lei, HE Jian-guo, et al(吴龙国, 王松磊, 何建国). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析)，2018, 38(8): 2563.
[14] CHEN Hong-yan, ZHAO Geng-xing, LI Yu-huan, et al(陈红艳, 赵庚星, 李玉环, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报)，2018, 34(12): 119.
