|
|
|
|
|
|
Study on Information and Model of High Polarization Hyperspectral about Vegetation-Soil Mixed Pixels Based on Different Vegetation Indices |
MA Shuang, HAN Yang*, HUANG Meng-xue, WANG Ying, WU Miao-miao, JIN Lun |
School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China |
|
|
Abstract Hyperspectral remote sensing is increasingly used to determine the feature components of mixed pixels and their proportions. In this paper, the vegetation soil mixed pixels of different area ratio were set as the research object, and polarization means and ASD FieldSpec3 spectrometer was applied to obtain polarized reflectance spectrum curve of vegetation soil mixed pixels to calculated the proportion of 8 different vegetation index and discuss the hyperspectral polarization characteristics of vegetation soil mixed pixels under different area ratio and different polarization angle. The study found that as the increasing of the proportion of leaves, vegetation soil spectral curves increasingly appeared “5 valleys and 4 peaks”, and the positions of the peak and bottom were basically the same. The larger the angle of polarization, the greater the spectral reflectance ratio of mixed pixels was; In mixed pixels, the larger the proportion of the vegetation, the greater the influence of the polarization angle. The vegetation index and the size of vegetation in mixed pixels were in a linear relationship and the correlation coefficient between the vegetation attenuation index and the improved red edge normalized difference vegetation index was the largest, which could reach about 98%, suitable for establishing the correlation model between vegetation index and vegetation proportion of mixed pixel area.. When vegetation area changes, the sensitivity of vegetation index is better by improving the red edge ratio. In the use of spectral absorption characteristic parameters to estimate vegetation index, the two order function model of absorption valley depth and photochemical vegetation index had the strongest fitting degree with the determination coefficient R2 of 0.963 3; The two degree function model of spectral absorption index and photochemical vegetation index had the strongest fitting degree, and the coefficient of determination R2 was 0.960 5.
|
Received: 2016-03-02
Accepted: 2016-07-26
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
HAN Yang
E-mail: hany025@nenu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Qi J,Cabot F,Moran M S,et al. Remote Sensing of Environment,1995, 54(1):71.
[2] SHEN Guang-rong, WANG Ren-chao(申广荣, 王人潮). Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University·Agricultural Science(上海交通大学学报·农业科学版),2001, 19(4): 315.
[3] TONG Qing-xi, ZHENG Lan-fen(童庆禧, 郑兰芬). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 1997, 1(1): 50.
[4] YANG Zhe-hai, HAN Jian-feng, GONG Da-peng, et al(杨哲海, 韩建峰, 宫大鹏, 等). Hydrographic Surveying and Charting(海洋测绘), 2003, 23(6): 55.
[5] Aoki M,Yabuki K,Totsuka T. Research Report of the National Institute of Environmental Studies of Japan,1981,66:125.
[6] Barnes J D,Balaguer L,Manrique E,et al. Environmental and Experimental Botany,1992,32(2):85.
[7] Blackburn G A. Remote Sensing of Environment,1998,66(3):273.
[8] Chappelle E W,Kim M S,McMurtrey J E III. Remote Sensing of Environment,1992,39(3):239.
[9] Datt B. International Journal of Remote Sensing,1999,20(14):2741.
[10] Filella I,Penuelas J. International Journal of Remote Sensing,1994,15(7):1459. |
[1] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[3] |
LI Xin-quan1, 2,ZHANG Jun-qiang1, 3*,WU Cong-jun1,MA Jian1, 2,LU Tian-jiao1, 2,YANG Bin3. Optical Design of Airborne Large Field of View Wide Band Polarization Spectral Imaging System Based on PSIM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 250-257. |
[4] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[5] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[6] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[7] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[8] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[9] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[10] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[11] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[12] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
[13] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[14] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[15] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
|
|
|
|