|
|
|
|
|
|
| Removing the Effect of Soil Moisture Content on Hyperspectral Reflectance for the Estimation of Soil Organic Matter Content |
| YU Lei1,2, HONG Yong-sheng1,2, ZHU Ya-xing1,2, HUANG Peng1,2, HE Qi1,2, QI Feng3 |
1. Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for the Analysis and Simulation of Geographical Process, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
2. College of Urban and Environmental Science, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
3. School of Environmental and Sustainability Sciences, Kean University, New Jersey 07083，USA |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Soil hyperspectral technique was considered to be a fast, non-destructive and cost-effective alternative method for reliably analyzing soil organic matter content (SOMC). Nevertheless, hyperspectral technique challenged to use in the field, because several external environmental factors, such as soil moisture, temperature and texture, were uncontrolled, which could impact spectral reflectance seriously. Furthermore, soil moisture content (SMC) was an prime limiting aspect for hyperspectral field applications, which showed sensitive influence on the Vi-NIR optical domain. With the aim to remove the effect of SMC on the improvement of SOMC prediction, 32 fluvo-aquic soil samples at 0～20 cm depth were collected from Qianjiang in Jianghan Plain, which were rewetted in laboratory. 192 spectral reflectance from 6 levels of SMC were measured using ASD FieldSpec 3 and normalized using standard normal variate (SNV). Meanwhile, the influence of SMC on the soil spectra was analyzed and discussed. Specifically, we would like to investigate the external parameter orthogonalization (EPO) algorithm to remove the SMC effect on the spectral calibration, and the feasibility of EPO corrected spectra for estimating SOMC by comparing the partial least squares regression (PLSR) prediction results of the EPO uncorrected and corrected spectra. Results showed that the SMC had a large influence on soil spectral reflectance, which masked the subtle responses of SOMC on reflectance. The SNV transformation could not correct the differences between the dry soil spectra and the spectra obtained at various of SMC. However, the spectra at different levels of SMC were unified after EPO correction. Using the PLSR model calibrated with the EPO corrected spectra, the model accuracy was significantly improved relative to the EPO uncorrected spectra, and its values of R2, RPD for the predicted model were 0.84, 2.50, and the EPO-PLSR model could estimate SOMC comprehensively and stably, which indicated that the effects of SMC on the spectra was successfully eliminated. Thus, in the future, this approach may facilitate the proximally sensed field spectra for rapidly measuring SOMC across this study area.
|
|
Received: 2016-03-31
Accepted: 2016-08-12
|
|
|
|
[1] St Luce M，Ziadi N，Zebaruh B J，et al. Geoderma，2014，232：449.
[2] Kodaira M，Shibusawa S. Geoderma，2013，199(SI)：64.
[3] Shi Z，Ji W，Viscarra Rossel R A，et al. European Journal of Soil Science，2015，66(4)：679.
[4] Das B S，Sarathjith M C，Santra P，et al. Current Science，2015，108(5)：860.
[5] Roger J M, Chauchard F, Bellon-Maurel V. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems，2003，66(2)：191.
[6] Liu Y，Pan X Z，Wang C K，et al. Plos One，2015，10(10)：e0140688.
[7] Minasny B，McBratney A B，Bellon-Maurel V，et al. Geoderma，2011，167-168：118.
[8] CHEN Yi-yun，QI Kun，LIU Yao-lin，et al(陈奕云，漆 锟，刘耀林，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析)，2015，35(6)：1705.
[9] Rienzi E A，Mijatovic B，Mueller T G，et al. Soil Science Society of America Journal，2014，78(3)：958.
[10] BAO Shi-dan(鲍士旦). Soil Agrichemical Analysis(土壤农化分析). Beijing: China Agriculture Press(北京：中国农业出版社)，1999. 30.
[11] HONG Yong-sheng，YU Lei，GENG Lei，et al(洪永胜，于 雷，耿 雷，等). Journal of Central China Normal University·Natural Science(华中师范大学学报·自然科学版)，2016，50(2)：303.
[12] Savitzky A，Golay M J E. Analytical Chemistry，1964，36：1627.
[13] Ge Y F，Morgan C L S，Ackerson J P. Geoderma，2014，221：61.
[14] Ackerson J P，Dematte J A M，Morgan C L S. Geoderma，2015，259：196.
[15] YU Lei，HONG Yong-sheng，GENG Lei，et al(于 雷，洪永胜，耿 雷，等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报)，2015，31(14)：103. |
| [1] |
WANG Cai-ling1，ZHANG Jing1，WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
| [2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
| [3] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
| [4] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
| [5] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
| [6] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
| [7] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
| [8] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
| [9] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
| [10] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
| [11] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
| [12] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
| [13] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
| [14] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
| [15] |
TAO Jing-zhe1, 3, SONG De-rui1, 3, SONG Chuan-ming2, WANG Xiang-hai1, 2*. Multi-Band Remote Sensing Image Sharpening: A Survey[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2999-3008. |
|
|
|
|
