| 光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Impact of Light Polarization on the Measurement of Water Particulate Backscattering Coefficient |
| LIU Jia1,2, GONG Fang1*, HE Xian-qiang1, ZHU Qian-kun1, HUANG Hai-qing1 |
| 1. State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China2. Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Intelligent Information System, Xi’an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710119, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Particulate backscattering coefficient is a main inherent optical properties (IOPs) of water, which is also a determining factor of ocean color and a basic parameter for inversion of satellite ocean color remote sensing. In-situ measurement with optical instruments is currently the main method for obtaining the particulate backscattering coefficient of water. Due to reflection and refraction by the mirrors in the instrument optical path, the emergent light source from the instrument may be partly polarized, thus to impact the measurement accuracy of water backscattering coefficient. At present, the light polarization of measuring instruments and its impact on the measurement accuracy of particulate backscattering coefficient are still poorly known. For this reason, taking a widely used backscattering coefficient measuring instrument HydroScat6 (HS-6) as an example in this paper, the polarization characteristic of the emergent light from the instrument was systematically measured, and further experimental study on the impact of the light polarization on the measurement accuracy of the particulate backscattering coefficient of water was carried out. The results show that the degree of polarization(DOP) of the central wavelength of emergent light ranges from 20% to 30% for all of the six channels of the HS-6, except the 590 nm channel from which the DOP of the emergent light is slightly low (~15%). Therefore, the emergent light from the HS-6 has significant polarization. Light polarization has non-neglectable impact on the measurement of particulate backscattering coefficient, and the impact degree varies with the wave band, linear polarization angle and suspended particulate matter(SPM) concentration. At different SPM concentrations, the mean difference caused by light polarization can reach 15.49%, 11.27%, 12.79%, 14.43%, 13.76%, and 12.46% in six bands, 420, 442, 470, 510, 590, and 670 nm, respectively. Consequently, the impact of light polarization on the measurement of particulate backscattering coefficient with an optical instrument should be taken into account, and the DOP of the emergent light should be reduced as much as possible.
|
|
Received: 2014-08-20
Accepted: 2014-12-21
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
GONG Fang
E-mail: gongfang@sio.org.cn
|
|
[1] Anu Reinart, Birgot Paavel, Don Pierson. Boreal Environment Research, 2004, 9：429.
[2] Huot Y, Morel A, Twardowski M S, et al. Biogeosciences Discussions, 2007, 4(6): 4571.
[3] Stramska M, Stramski D, Hapter R, et al. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2003, 108(C5).
[4] Platt T, Sathyendranath S. Science, 1988, 241(4873): 1613.
[5] Flory E N, Hill P S, Milligan T G, et al. Deep Sea Research Part Ⅰ: Oceanographic Research Papers, 2004, 51(2): 213.
[6] Kutser T, Dekker A G, Skirving W. Limnology and Oceanography, 2003, 48(1): 497.
[7] Ammenberg P, Flink P, Lindell T, et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2002, 23(8): 1621.
[8] McKee D, Cunningham A. Applied Optics, 2005, 44(1): 126.
[9] Boss E, Pegau W S, Lee M, et al. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978-2012), 2004, 109(C1).
[10] Jrgensen P V, Tilstone G, Hokedal J, et al. Frascatti: European Space Agency, 2002.
[11] Zhang X, He X Q, Chen X, et al. SPIE, 2011: 81751C-81751C-8.
[12] Chami M, McKee D. Optics Express, 2007, 15(15): 9494.
[13] Loisel H, Duforet L, Dessailly D, et al. Optics Express, 2008, 16(17): 12905.
[14] He X Q, Pan D, Bai Y, et al. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4.
[15] Harmel T, Tonizzo A, Ibrahim A, et al. SPIE Remote Sensing. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2011: 817509-817509-14.
[16] You Y, Tonizzo A, Gilerson A A, et al. Applied Optics, 2011, 50(24): 4873.
[17] Robert A. Maffione, David R. Dana. Applied Optics, 1997, 36(24): 6057.
[18] Morel A. Optical Aspects of Oceanography, 1974, 1.
[19] Hatcher A, Hill P, Grant J, et al. Marine Geology, 2000, 168(1): 115. |
| [1] |
ZHAO Tai-fei1,2，WANG Chan1，LENG Yu-xin1, SONG Peng3. The Study of Polarization Characteristics of Ultraviolet Light Scattering from Chebyshev Haze Particles[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(07): 2149-2156. |
| [2] |
WU Jin-hui1, 2, YU Jun-zhi1*, LIU Han-qi3, WANG Gao2, 4. Research on Polarization Spectrum Imaging System Based on Orthogonal Modulation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(07): 2315-2319. |
| [3] |
WANG Han1*, YANG Lei-ku1, DU Wei-bing1, LIU Pei1, SUN Xiao-bing2, 3. Inversion of Aerosol Optical Depth over Land Surface from Airborne Polarimetric Measurements[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(04): 1019-1024. |
| [4] |
GAO Xiao-yu1, 2, 3，LU Shan1*. The Relationship of the Leaf Surface Wettability and Degree of Reflectance Polarization[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(03): 923-928. |
| [5] |
YUAN Jing, SHEN Jia-lin*, LIU Jian-kun, ZHENG Rong-hua. Determination of Rare Earth Elements in Geological Samples by High-Energy Polarized Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(02): 582-589. |
| [6] |
LUAN Xiao-ning1, ZHANG Feng1, GUO Jin-jia1, CUI Ting-wei2, ZHENG Rong-er1*. Polarization Characterization of Laser-Induced Fluorescence from the Simulated Oil Samples Based on Polar Decomposition of Mueller Matrix[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(02): 467-474. |
| [7] |
WANG Ling-zhi, HAN Yang*, PAN Qian. Study on Farmland Soil Fertility Model Based on Multi-Angle Polarized Hyper-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(01): 240-245. |
| [8] |
TANG Qian1, GUO Li-xin1*, ZHAO Bao-chang2. An Allotype Double H-V Depolarizer for Hyperfine Spectrometer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(12): 3913-3919. |
| [9] |
LI Xiao1,3, LIU Shun1,2*, WANG Zhi-bin1, XUE Peng1, ZHANG Rui1, WANG Yao-li1, JING Ning1. New Method for Obtaining Full-Stokes Parameters of High-Spectral Polarization Imaging System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(12): 3953-3958. |
| [10] |
SUN Zhe1, HAN Tong-shuai1, 2, JIANG Jing-ying1*, LI Chen-xi1, 2, XU Ke-xin1, 2. Study on Surface Reflectance Light Elimination of Biological Tissue with Cross-Polarization[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(11): 3520-3524. |
| [11] |
MA Shuang, HAN Yang*, HUANG Meng-xue, WANG Ying, WU Miao-miao, JIN Lun. Study on Information and Model of High Polarization Hyperspectral about Vegetation-Soil Mixed Pixels Based on Different Vegetation Indices[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(11): 3549-3556. |
| [12] |
YUAN Qi1，2，3, LI Shuang1，3*, HAN Lin1，3. Research on Spatial Amplitude Modulation for Spectropolarimetry Measurement Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(11): 3321-3326. |
| [13] |
XIA Pu1,2, LIU Xue-bin1*. Study on the Polarization Spectral Image Dehazing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(08): 2331-2338. |
| [14] |
WU Di1, SUN Zhong-qiu2. The Investigation of Spectral Polarization of Vegetation Canopy Basing on the Field Measurements[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(08): 2533-2538. |
| [15] |
YANG Fan-chao1, 2, LI Yong1, HU Bing-liang1, KONG Liang1 , WEI Ru-yi1, LI Hong-bo1, 2. Design of Hyperspectral Polarimetic Imaging System Based on LCTF and LCVR[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(08): 2610-2614. |
|
|
|
|
