光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Resonance Wavelength Effects on Sensitivity of Resonant Grating Waveguide Biosensor |
JIA Ke-hui, MA Jun-shan* |
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Contemporary Optics System, College of Optics and Electronics, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China |
|
|
Abstract Resonant grating waveguide (RGW) biosensor has been widely investigated in recent years. The system has several advantages such as minimizing, label-free, high throughput, real time monitoring and so on. The sensitivity of RGW biosensor was theoretically analyzed for different resonance wavelength. Sensitivity to the refractive index and thickness of the sample was analyzed using rigorous coupled wave analysis method. Results indicate that the sensitivity to refractive index is constant for a certain resonance wavelength as the thickness of sample does not change. The sensitivity to refractive index is enhanced with the increase of resonance wavelength. RGW with 1 250 nm resonance wavelength is approximately 4 times as sensitive as RGW with 830 nm resonance wavelength. The sensitivity to thickness drastically decreased at first, and then achieved zero for a certain resonance wavelength as the refractive index of sample is invariable. It was showed that it is limited to test sample thickness for every RGW. RGW with 1 250 nm resonance wavelength is approximately 2 times the measure range as RGW with 830 nm resonance wavelength. The sensitivity to thickness is enhanced with the increase of resonance wavelength. RGW with 1 250 nm resonance wavelength is approximately 3 times as sensitive as RGW with 830 nm resonance wavelength. The above results reveal that the sensitivity to both sample refractive index and sample thickness is enhanced with the increase of resonance wavelength. And the capability of testing sample thickness improves with longer resonance wavelength. The results provided the theory basis for resonance wavelength choice of RGW biosensor.
|
Received: 2011-06-09
Accepted: 2011-09-10
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
MA Jun-shan
E-mail: junshanma@163.com
|
|
[1] Magnusson R, Wang S S, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1992, 61(9): 1022. [2] Magnusson R, Shin D, Liu Z S, Opt. Lett., 1998, 23(8): 612. [3] Poutous Menelaos K, Pung Aaron J, Srinivasan Pradeep, et al. Opt. Express, 2010, 18(26): 27764. [4] Li Peter Y, Lin Bo, Gerstenmaier John, et al. Sens. Actuators B, 2004, 99: 6. [5] Dobbs Dennis W, Cunningham Brian T, Appl. Opt., 2006, 45(28): 7286. [6] Choi Charles J, Block Ian D, Bole Brian, et al. IEEE Sens. J., 2009, 9(12): 1697. [7] Cunningham Brian, Lin Bo, Qiu Jean, et al. Sens. Actuators B, 2002, 85: 219. [8] Cunningham Brian, Qiu Jean, Li Peter, et al. Sens. Actuators B, 2002, 87: 365. [9] Szeghalmi Adriana, Kley Ernst Bernhard, Knez Mato, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114: 21150. [10] Lee Kyu J, Wawro Debra, Priambodo Purnomo S, et al. IEEE Sens. J., 2007, 7(3): 409. [11] Schmid J H, Sinclair W, García J, et al. Opt. Express, 2009, 17(20): 18371. [12] Moharam M G, Gaylord T K, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 1981, 71(7):811. [13] Wang S S, Magnusson R, Appl. Opt., 1995, 34(14): 2414. [14] Cheong W F, Prahl S A, Welch A J, IEEE J. Quantum Electron, 1990, 26(12): 2166. [15] Hale George M, Querry Marvin R, Appl. Opt., 1973, 12(3): 555. |
[1] |
WU Shu-jia1, 2, YAO Ming-yin2, 3, ZENG Jian-hui2, HE Liang2, FU Gang-rong2, ZENG Yu-qi2, XUE Long2, 3, LIU Mu-hua2, 3, LI Jing2, 3*. Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Detection of Cu Element in Pig Fodder by Combining Cavity-Confinement[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1770-1775. |
[2] |
ZHANG Rong1, 2, DUAN Ning1, 3, JIANG Lin-hua1, 3*, XU Fu-yuan3, JIN Wei3, LI Jian-hui1. Study on Optical Path Optimization for Direct Determination of
Spectrophotometry of High Concentration Hexavalent Chromium
Solution by Ultraviolet Visible Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1829-1837. |
[3] |
SI Gan-shang1, 2, LIU Jia-xiang1, LI Zhen-gang1, 2, NING Zhi-qiang1, 2, FANG Yong-hua1, 2*, CHENG Zhen1, 2, SI Bei-bei1, 2, YANG Chang-ping1, 2. Raman Signal Enhancement for Liquid Detection Using a New Sample Cell[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 712-717. |
[4] |
ZHANG Xue-fei1, DUAN Ning1, 2*, JIANG Lin-hua1, 2*, CHENG Wen2, YU Zhao-sheng3, LI Wei-dong2, ZHU Guang-bin4, XU Yan-li2. Study on Stability and Sensitivity of Deep Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry Detection System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3802-3810. |
[5] |
LI Yan-yan1, 2, LUO Hai-jun1, 2*, LUO Xia1, 2, FAN Xin-yan1, 2, QIN Rui1, 2. Detection of Craniocerebral Hematoma by Array Scanning Sensitivity Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 392-398. |
[6] |
LI Ming1, 2, NI Long1, WANG Meng1, 2*, ZHU Zhong-xu1, YUAN Chuan-jun1, 2, WU Jian3*. Research Progress on Evaluating the Effects of Nanomaterial-Based Development of Latent Fingerprints[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2670-2680. |
[7] |
YIN Tao1, 2, LIU Zi-wei1, 2, CAI Chen1, QI Zhi-mei1,2*. Determination of Surface Plasmon Resonance Wavelength by Combination of Radiation-Based Spectral Correction With Self-Adaptive Fitting[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(01): 32-38. |
[8] |
LIU Qing-sheng1, YANG De-wang2, GUO Jin-jia1*, YAN Ao-shuang1, ZHENG Rong-er1. Raman Spectroscopy for Gas Detection Using a Folded Near-Concentric Cavity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(11): 3390-3393. |
[9] |
TIAN Xing1, 2, 3, CAO Yuan1, 3, WANG Jing-jing1, 3, CHEN Jia-jin1, LIU Kun1, TAN Tu1, WANG Gui-shi1, GAO Xiao-ming1*. High Sensitivity Detection of Two-Component CH4/H2O Based on Off-Axis Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(10): 3078-3083. |
[10] |
WANG Zi-ren, WANG Chang-hua, HU Fang-fei, LI Ji-dong*. Quantification of Trace Impurities in Graphite by Glow Discharge Mass Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1256-1261. |
[11] |
MAO Feng1, WANG Ming-jia2*. Low-Light-Level Readout Based on Quantum Dots-in-Well Photodetector at Room Temperature[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(03): 877-881. |
[12] |
TANG Qian1, GUO Li-xin1*, ZHAO Bao-chang2. An Allotype Double H-V Depolarizer for Hyperfine Spectrometer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(12): 3913-3919. |
[13] |
ZHA Shen-long1, 2, LIU Kun1, ZHU Gong-dong1, TAN Tu1, WANG Lei1, WANG Gui-shi1, MEI Jiao-xu1, GAO Xiao-ming1*. Acetylene Detection Based on Resonant High Sensitive Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(09): 2673-2678. |
[14] |
JIANG Ying1, ZHANG Chong-zhen1, LIANG Da-kai2, LU Ji-yun3. Optimal Research on the Strain Sensitivity of Polarization Maintaining Fiber Loop Mirror[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(05): 1576-1580. |
[15] |
WANG Li, TAN Lin-qiu, CHANG Bo, LU Geng-geng, GAO Fei, HUA Deng-xin* . Doppler Lidar with High Sensitivity and Large Dynamic Range for Atmospheric Wind Measurement[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(03): 958-963. |
|
|
|
|