| 光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Studies on the Estimation of Soil Organic Matter Content Based on Hyper-Spectrum |
| LIU Lei1, 2，SHEN Run-ping1, 2*，DING Guo-xiang2 |
1. Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of Ministry of Education，Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
2. Anhui Meteorological Bureau, Hefei 230001, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Hyperspectral remote sensing technology can be extensively applied in soil nutrient research due to its three special advantages, high spectral resolution, strong waveband continuity as well as a great deal of spectral information. Based on analyzing the soil organic matter content using hyper-spectral remote sensing technology, soil nutrients status and its dynamic changes can be fully understood, thus providing the scientific basis for guidance of the agricultural production and protection of agricultural ecological environment. The present paper studies the relationship between soil spectrum and soil organic fraction based on spectrum curves (ranging from 350 to 2 500 nm) of 34 soil samples, which were collected in Yujiang and Taihe County, Jiangxi Province. First, soil reflection spectrum was mathematically manipulated into first derivative reflectance spectra (FDR) and inverse-log spectra (log(1/R)); second, the relationship between soil spectrum and soil organic fraction was investigated by stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR) and partial least square regression (PLSR) on the ground of characteristic absorption; third, corresponding estimation model was built and examined. The result conveys that spectral data are compressed by carrying out arithmetic average operation by 10nm for intervals. The first derivative of the reflectivity is an effective spectrum indicator, in the stepwise multiple linear regression analysis of soil organic matter, for the first derivative transformation, the regression models’ precision of establishment and verification increased. The model built by PLSR method based on the characteristic absorption bands precedes that of SMLR. In the PLSR model of soil reflection spectrum and the inverse-log spectra, the test samples’ average of relative error is 16% and 17% respectively, the correlation coefficient between retrieval value and measured value is 0.84 and 0.91 respectively, for it’s faster to estimate the soil organic fraction.
|
|
Received: 2010-03-29
Accepted: 2010-06-30
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
SHEN Run-ping
E-mail: rpshen@nuist.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Al-Abbas A H, Swain P H, Baumgarder M F. Soil Sci., 1972, 114(6): 477.
[2] Glvao L S, Vitorello I. Remote Sens. Environ., 1998, 63: 166.
[3] XU Bin-bin(徐彬彬). Soils(土壤), 2000, 32(6): 281.
[4] ZENG Zhi-yuan(曾志远). Soils(土壤), 1987, 19(2): 72.
[5] XIE Bo-cheng, XUE Xu-zhang, LIU Wei-dong, et al(谢伯承, 薛绪掌, 刘伟东, 等). Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报), 2005, 42: 171.
[6] WANG Jing, HE Ting, LI Yu-huan, et al(王 静, 何 挺, 李玉环, 等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2005, 4: 438.
[7] ZHENG Li-hua, LI Min-zan, PAN Luan, et al(郑立华, 李民赞, 潘 娈, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2008, 28(5): 1160.
[8] HE Jun-liang, JIANG Jian-jun, ZHOU Sheng-lu, et al(贺军亮, 蒋建军, 周生路, 等). Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research(农机化研究), 2009, (3): 30.
[9] DU Sen, GAO Xiang-zhao, et al(杜 森, 高祥照，等). Technical Specification of Soil Analysis(土壤分析技术规范). Beijing： China Agriculture Press(北京： 中国农业出版社), 2006. 36.
[10] SHEN Run-ping, DING Guo-xiang, WEI Guo-shuan, et al(沈润平, 丁国香, 魏国栓, 等). Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报), 2009, 46(3): 391.
[11] LU Yan-li, BAI You-lu, YANG Li-ping, et al(卢艳丽, 白由路, 杨俐苹, 等). Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学), 2007, 40(9): 1989.
[12] HE Ting, WANG Jing, LIN Zong-jian, et al(何 挺, 王 静, 林宗坚, 等). Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University(武汉大学学报·信息科学版), 2006, 31(1): 975.
[13] XU Yong-ming(徐永明). Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报)，2006，9(5): 709.
[14] Grossman Y L，Ustin S L，Jaequemoud5，et al. Remote Sensing of Environment，1996，56: 1.
[15] JIANG Hong-wei, XIA Jie-lai(蒋红卫, 夏结来). Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University(第四军医大学学报), 2003, 24(3): 280.
|
| [1] |
BAO Hao1, 2，ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
| [2] |
WANG Cai-ling1，ZHANG Jing1，WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
| [3] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
| [4] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
| [5] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
| [6] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
| [7] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
| [8] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
| [9] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
| [10] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
| [11] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
| [12] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
| [13] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
| [14] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
| [15] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
|
|
|
|
