|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationships Between the Leaf Respiration of Soybean and Vegetation
Indexes and Leaf Characteristics |
WANG Jin1, 2, CHEN Shu-tao1, 2*, DING Si-cheng1, 2, YAO Xue-wen1, 2, ZHANG Miao-miao1, 2, HU Zheng-hua2 |
1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
2. School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
|
|
|
Abstract A field experiment was performed to investigate the relationships between the leaf respiration of soybean and vegetation indexes and leaf characteristics. The respiration and respiration coefficient of the first, second and third leaves from the top at the different growth stages were measured. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), difference vegetation index (DVI), ratio index (RVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI), photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and red edge chlorophyll indexes (RECI) were obtained from the hyperspectral method as well as the leaf characteristics of chlorophyll SPAD value, fresh mass, dried mass, water content, leaf area, specific leaf area and nitrogen content were also determined. The results showed that the respiration of a single leaf and respiration coefficient had obvious seasonal patterns. The seasonal mean respiration of the single first, second or third leaf from the top was (0.157±0.019), (0.162±0.014) and (0.142±0.010) mg·d-1, respectively. The seasonal mean respiration coefficient of the first, second or third leaf from the top was (0.638±0.072),(0.678±0.082),(0.642±0.076) mg·g-1·d-1, respectively. There were no significant (p>0.05) differences in the seasonal mean leaf respiration and respiration coefficient between the first, second or third leaf from the top. There were significant (p<0.05) differences in the seasonal patterns between the different vegetation indexes. The relatively high RVI, EVI, PRI and RECI appeared mid-growth stages. The seasonal patterns of RVI, EVI, PRI and RECI showed a single unimodal curve. The SPAD value, fresh mass, dried mass and leaf area decreased with the decrease in leaf position except for at the beginning growth stages. The leaf water content decreased with the growth of leaf growth. The respiration of a single leaf was highly significantly (p<0.01) correlated with the RECI and nitrogen content. The respiration of a single leaf was significantly (p<0.05) correlated with the air temperature and PRI. A model based on these four factors explained 60.4% of the variation in the respiration of a single leaf. The respiration coefficient was highly significantly (p<0.01) correlated with thedried mass and specific leaf area. The respiration coefficient was significantly (p<0.01) correlated with the air temperature and SPAD. A model based on these four factors explained 72.4% of the variation in the respiration coefficient. The present study showed that the leaf respiration of soybean could be linked with the hyperspectral vegetation indexes and the leaf characteristics. The seasonal variations in the leaf respiration and leaf respiration coefficient in the different positions could be effectively modeled with the hyperspectral vegetation indexes.
|
Received: 2021-04-18
Accepted: 2021-06-10
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
CHEN Shu-tao
E-mail: chenstyf@aliyun.com
|
|
[1] Canadell J G, Le Quéré C, Raupach M R, et al. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the USA, 2007, 104(47): 18866.
[2] Jung M, Reichstein M, Schwalm C R, et al. Nature, 2017, 541(7638):516.
[3] Melillo J M, McGuire A D, Kicklighter D W, et al. Nature, 1993, 363: 234.
[4] Atkin O K, Bloomfield K J, Reich P B, et al. New Phytologist, 2015, 206(2): 614.
[5] Bouma T J, de Visser R, van Leeuwen P H, et al. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1995, 46(9): 1185.
[6] Tjoelker M G, Oleksyn J, Reich P B. Global Change Biology, 2001, 7(2): 223.
[7] Clark D B, Mercado L M, Sitch S, et al. Geoscientific Model Development, 2011, 4(3): 701.
[8] Mitchell K A, Bolstad P V, Vose J M. Tree Physiology, 1999, 19: 861.
[9] Ryan M G. Plant, Cell and Environment, 1995, 18: 765.
[10] Tjoelker M G, Reich P B, Oleksyn J. Plant, Cell and Environment, 1999, 22: 767.
[11] Broge N H, Leblanc E. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2001, 76(2): 156.
[12] Wu C Y, Niu Z, Tang Q, et al. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2008, 148(8-9): 1230.
[13] Justice C, Belward A, Morisette J, et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2000, 21(17): 3383.
[14] Huang N, Niu Z, Zhan Y, et al. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2012, 160(4): 80.
[15] BAO Shi-dan(鲍士旦). Soil Agrochemical Analysis(土壤农化分析). 3rd edition(第3版). Beijing, Chinese Agricultural Press(北京: 中国农业出版社), 2019.
[16] Gamon J A, Field C B, Goulden M L, et al. Ecological Applications, 1995, 5(1): 28.
[17] Sims D A, Gamon J A. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81(2): 337.
[18] Huete A, Didan K, Miura T, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 83(1-2): 195.
[19] Posada D, Buckley T R. Systematic Biology, 2004, 53(5): 793.
[20] Wu F, Wu L, Xu F. Field Crops Research, 1998, 56(3): 309.
[21] WU Gai-hong, FENG Mei-chen, YANG Wu-de, et al(武改红, 冯美臣, 杨武德, 等). Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 2018, 37(5): 1589.
[22] Weerasinghe L K, Creek D, Crous K Y, et al. Tree Physiology, 2014, 34(6): 564.
[23] Kosugi Y, Takanashi S, Yokoyama N, et al. Journal of Plant Research, 2012, 125: 1.
[24] Jia M, Wang K, Zhou C, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 165: 104942.
[25] Zhu X, He H, Ma M, et al. Sustainability, 2020, 12:2099.
[26] Meng B, Gao J, Liang T, et al. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(2): 320.
[27] Reich P B, Walters M B, Tjoelker M G, et al. Functional Ecology, 1998, 12(3): 395.
[28] Reich P B, Walters M B, Ellsworth D S, et al. Oecologia, 1998b, 114(4): 471.
[29] SUN Wen-juan, HUANG Yao, CHEN Shu-tao, et al(孙文娟, 黄 耀, 陈书涛, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2004, 25(3): 1.
[30] SUN Wen-juan, HUANG Yao, CHEN Shu-tao, et al(孙文娟, 黄 耀, 陈书涛, 等). Acta Ecoligica Sinica (生态学报), 2005, 5(5): 1152.
[31] Ryan M G. Ecological Applications, 1991, 1(2): 157.
[32] Sun W, Huang Y, Chen S, et al. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2007, 24(1): 55.
[33] Lambers H, Poorter H. Advances in Ecological Research, 1992, 23: 187.
[34] Ali A M, Darvishzadeh R, Skidmore A K, et al. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 236: 162.
|
[1] |
JIN Cheng-qian1, 2, GUO Zhen1, ZHANG Jing1, MA Cheng-ye1, TANG Xiao-han1, ZHAO Nan1, YIN Xiang1. Non-Destructive Detection and Visualization of Soybean Moisture Content Using Hyperspectral Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3052-3057. |
[2] |
GUI Jiang-sheng1, HE Jie1, FU Xia-ping2. Hyperspectral Detection of Soybean Heart-Eating Insect Pests Based on Image Retrieval[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2931-2934. |
[3] |
DING Jun-nan, WANG Hui, YU Shao-peng*. Application of Rapid Fluorescence Analysis Technology on Study on
Glycine Soja Response to PAHs(Phenanthrene)[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2207-2212. |
[4] |
WANG Xiao-xuan1, LU Xiao-ping1*, MENG Qing-yan2, 3, LI Guo-qing4, WANG Jun4, ZHANG Lin-lin2, 3, YANG Ze-nan1. Inversion of Leaf Area Index Based on GF-6 WFV Spectral Vegetation
Index Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2278-2283. |
[5] |
WANG Xiao-xuan1, LU Xiao-ping1*, LI Guo-qing2, WANG Jun2, YANG Zen-an1, ZHOU Yu-shi1, FENG Zhi-li1. Combining the Red Edge-Near Infrared Vegetation Indexes of DEM to
Extract Urban Vegetation Information[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2284-2289. |
[6] |
JI Tong1, 2, WANG Bo1, 2, YANG Jun-ying1, 2, LI Qiang1, 2, HE Guo-xing1, 2, PAN Dong-rong3, LIU Xiao-ni1, 2*. Spectral Characteristic Analysis and Spectral Identification of Desert Plants in Yanchi, Ningxia[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 678-685. |
[7] |
JIANG Yan1, 2, MENG He1, ZHAO Yi-rong1, WANG Xian-xu1, WANG Sui1, XUE En-yu3, WANG Shao-dong1*. Rapid Analysis of Main Quality Parameters in Forage Soybean by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 919-923. |
[8] |
HAN Yu1, SONG Shao-zhong2*, ZHANG Jia-huan3, TAN Yong1*, LIU Chun-yu1, ZHOU Yun-quan1, QU Guan-nan1, HAN Yan-li4, ZHANG Jing3, HU Yu3, MENG Wei-shi3, LIU Huan-jun5, ZHANG Yi-xiang1, LI Jia-yi1. Research on Soybean Bacterial Disease Markers Based on Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 459-463. |
[9] |
DU Meng-meng1, Ali Roshanianfard2, LIU Ying-chao3. Inversion of Wheat Tiller Density Based on Visible-Band Images of Drone[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3828-3836. |
[10] |
JIANG Jing1, 2, ZHAO Zi-wei1, 2, CAI Chang1, 2, ZHANG Jin-song3, CHENG Zhi-qing1, 2*. Hyperspectral Estimation of Tea Leaves Water Content Under the Influence of Dust Retention[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3532-3537. |
[11] |
LIU Wei, YU Qiang*, NIU Teng, YANG Lin-zhe, LIU Hong-jun, YAN Fei. Study on the Relationship Between Element As in Soil of Agricultural Land and Leaf Spectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2866-2871. |
[12] |
LIU Yang1, 2, 4, SUN Qian1, 4, HUANG Jue2, FENG Hai-kuan1, 3, 4*, WANG Jiao-jiao1, 4, YANG Gui-jun1, 4. Estimation of Potato Above Ground Biomass Based on UAV Multispectral Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2549-2555. |
[13] |
XIA Tian1*, YANG Ke-ming2, FENG Fei-sheng3, GUO Hui4, ZHANG Chao2. A New Copper Stress Vegetation Index NCSVI Explores the Sensitive Range of Corn Leaves Spectral Under Copper Pollution[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2604-2610. |
[14] |
GUI Jiang-sheng1, FEI Jing-yi1, FU Xia-ping2. Hyperspectral Imaging for Detection of Leguminivora Glycinivorella Based on 3D Few-Shot Meta-Learning Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(07): 2171-2174. |
[15] |
LIU Shuang, YU Hai-ye, ZHANG Jun-he, ZHOU Hai-gen, KONG Li-juan, ZHANG Lei, DANG Jing-min, SUI Yuan-yuan*. Study on Inversion Model of Chlorophyll Content in Soybean Leaf Based on Optimal Spectral Indices[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1912-1919. |
|
|
|
|