高光谱成像鉴别玉米品种早期抗倒性

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)04-1229-06

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2788 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Given the time-consuming, labor-intensive and time-lagging problems of traditional methods for identifying lodging resistance of maize, this study uses hyperspectral imaging data combined with machine learning methods to identify lodging resistance of maize at the 9-leaf stage. It gives the recommended planting density and modeling methods. The experiment set up 3 planting densities of 5 000, 7 000 and 9 000 plants·mu^-1 and 6 typical lodging resistant/non-lodging resistant varieties. Hyperspectral images of corn top leaves at the 9-leaf stage were collected, reflectance correction and target spectral curve extraction were automatically performed by segmentation of the target area. For the collected sample data, the Kennard Stone algorithm is used to divide the sample training set and the test set, the principal component analysis (PCA) and the successive projections algorithm (SPA) are used to extract the spectral features. A support vector machines (SVM) model of Gaussian kernel function is established, with the performing of parameter training and optimization. By comparing the effect of each feature extraction method and the training effect of each model, and its prediction results under different planting densities, the planting density and modeling method recommended for the identification of maize lodging resistance were found. The test results show that the PCA method has the most significant dimensionality reduction effect on the spectral features at various planting densities. At the same time, the characteristic wavelength distribution selected by the SPA algorithm is relatively uniform, and the lodging resistance classification characteristics are obvious. The increase of planting density is beneficial to identifying the lodging resistance of maize. When the planting density is 7 000 plants·mu^-1, the training effect and prediction results of the model established by the SPA-SVM method are the best. The 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of the model on the training set data is 97.40%. The prediction accuracy rate of the set data is 98.33%.

Key words：Maize lodging resistance; Hyperspectral imaging; PCA; SPA; SVM

Received: 2021-04-09 Accepted: 2021-06-24

ZTFLH:

S126

Corresponding Authors: YANG Li E-mail: yangli@cau.edu.cn

Cite this article:

ZHANG Tian-liang,ZHANG Dong-xing,CUI Tao, et al. Identification of Early Lodging Resistance of Maize by Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1229-1234.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)04-1229-06 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2022/V42/I04/1229

[1] WU Qiong, YANG Ke-jun, ZHANG Yi-fei, et al(吴琼，杨克军，张翼飞, 等). Journal of Maize Sciences（玉米科学）, 2017, 25(4)：40.
[2] Zhang Ying, Du Jianjun, Wang Jinglu, et al. Biological Research, 2018, 51(1): 40.
[3] TIAN Zai-min, HUANG Zhi-hong, CHEN Jian-xin, et al（田再民，黄智鸿，陈建新, 等）. Journal of Maize Sciences（玉米科学）, 2016, 24(5): 83.
[4] Qin Haiming, Wang Cheng, Zhao Kaiguang, et al. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13(5): e197510.
[5] Feng L, Zhu S, Zhang C, et al. Molecules, 2018, 23(12): 3078.
[6] LI Xiao-bin, WANG Yu-shun, FU Li-hong, et al(李晓斌，王玉顺，付丽红，等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2016，36(12)：179.
[7] Chen Y, Zhao X, Jia X. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2015, 8(6): 2381.
[8] ZHAO Fan，YAN Zhao-ru，XUE Jian-xin, et al(赵凡，闫昭如，薛建新, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(1): 201.
[9] Chang C, Lin C. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2011, 2(3): 1.
[10] XIE Wen-yong，CHAI Qin-qin，GAN Yong-hui, et al(谢文涌，柴琴琴，甘勇辉, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2020, 36(14): 203.
[11] Arthur D, Vassilvitskii S. K-Means++: The Advantages of Careful Seeding, Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2007. 1027.
[12] Munera S, Amigo J M, Aleixos N, et al. Food Control, 2018, 86: 1.
[13] Araújo M C U, Saldanha T C B, Galväo R K H, et al. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2001, 57(2): 65.
[14] Wu Y, López S, Zhang B, et al. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 2019, 16(1): 99.
[15] Wang L, Chang C, Lee L, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(9): 4887.