|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quantitative Analysis of Nickel-Based Superalloys Based on a Remote LIBS System |
| WANG Ya-wen1,2,3, ZHANG Yong4, CHEN Xiong-fei1,2,3, LIU Ying1,2,3, ZHAO Zhen-yang4, YE Ming-guo5, XU Yu-xing6, LIU Peng-yu1,2,3* |
1. National Analysis and Testing Center of Nonferrous Metals and Electronic Materials, Beijing 100088, China
2. China United Test & Certification Co., Ltd., Beijing 101400, China
3. General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals, Beijing 100088, China
4. Shandong Dongyi Photoelectric Instruments Co., Ltd., Yantai 264670, China
5. Shandong Technology Transfer Center, CAS, Yantai 264003, China
6. Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the self-designed remote laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) system, the focusing characteristics of remote LIBS were analyzed, and the experimental method of quantitative analysis of nickel-base superalloy by remote LIBS was studied. In this LIBS system, the laser focusing and the plasma optical signal acquisition optical paths are coaxial and independently focused. Through automatic focusing, the remote analysis of 1~10 m can be achieved. The results show that affected by the depth of focus, the detectable range of plasma optical signal increases with the increase of working distance. That is, the requirement of the LIBS system for focusing accuracy decreases. At the same time, the decrease of power density caused by the increase of ablation spot size and the decrease of signal acquisition solid angle make the spectral line intensity attenuate in inverse proportion to the fourth power as the working distance increases. In this paper, the standard curves of Ni, Cr, Nb, Mo, Ti and Al in GH4169 nickel-based superalloy were established using the standard curve method without internal standard with internal standard. The goodness of fit of the standard curve with internal standard (0.999 7, 0.999 4, 0.999 87, 0.999 1, 0.998 1 and 0.999 7) was significantly better than that of the standard curve without internal standard (0.953 2, 0.876 6, 0.897 4, 0.914 5, 0.938 4 and 0.991 6). Finally, LIBS and XRF were compared. For major elements Ni, Cr, Nb and Mo, the relative standard deviations of the two methods were 1.75%~3.90% and 0.10%~0.52%, and the relative errors were 0.48%~0.92% and 0.64%~2.25%, respectively; for trace elements Ti and al, the relative standard deviations of the two methods were 5.58%, 5.86% and 2.39%, 5.64%, the relative error is 2.75%, 3.14% and 4.68%, 2.39% respectively. Due to the instability of plasma, the precision of the remote LIBS method is slightly lower than that of the XRF method. However, LIBS method can effectively reduce the measurement error through repeated measurements, which indicates that LIBS technology is feasible for remote on-line analysis of nickel-based superalloys.
|
|
Received: 2021-01-06
Accepted: 2021-02-01
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIU Peng-yu
E-mail: liupengyu@cutc.net
|
|
[1] DUAN Yi-xiang, LIN Qing-yu（段忆翔，林庆宇）. Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Analysis Technology and Its Application(激光诱导激穿光谱分析技术及其应用). Beijing: China Science Publishing & Media Group Ltd.（北京: 科学出版社）, 2016. 87.
[2] Sallé B, Mauchien P, Maurice S. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2007, 62(8): 739.
[3] Cremers D A, Radziemski L J. Handbook of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2013. 268.
[4] Noll R, Fricke-Begemann C, Connemann S, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2018, 33(6): 945.
[5] Castro J P, Pereira-Filho E R. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2016, 31(10): 2005.
[6] Maddaluno G, Almaviva S, Caneve L, et al. Nuclear Materials & Energy, 2019, 18: 208.
[7] Harmon R S, Lawley C J M, Watts J, et al. Minerals, 2019, 9(12): 718.
[8] Gudmundsson S H, Matthiasson J, Björnsson B M, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2019, 158: 105646.
[9] Sun L X, Yu H B, Cong Z B, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2015, 112: 40.
[10] Ahamer C M, Eschlböck-Fuchs S, Kolmhofer P J, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2016, 122: 157.
[11] Zhao T Z, Fan Z W, Lian F Q, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2017, 137: 64.
[12] Fu Y T, Hou Z Y, Li T Q, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2019, 155: 67.
[13] Syvilay D, Guezenoc J, Bousquet B. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2019, 161: 105696.
[14] Gaona I, Moros J, Laserna J J. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2013, 28(11): 1750.
|
| [1] |
ZHANG Xing-long1, LIU Yu-zhu1, 2*, SUN Zhong-mou1, ZHANG Qi-hang1, CHEN Yu1, MAYALIYA·Abulimiti3*. Online Monitoring of Pesticides Based on Laser Induced Breakdown
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1711-1715. |
| [2] |
YANG Lin-yu1, 2, 3, DING Yu1, 2, 3*, ZHAN Ye4, ZHU Shao-nong1, 2, 3, CHEN Yu-juan1, 2, 3, DENG Fan1, 2, 3, ZHAO Xing-qiang1, 2, 3. Quantitative Analysis of Mn and Ni Elements in Steel Based on LIBS and GA-PLS[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1804-1808. |
| [3] |
HE Ya-xiong1, 2, ZHOU Wen-qi1, 2, ZHUANG Bin1, 2, ZHANG Yong-sheng1, 2, KE Chuan3, XU Tao1, 2*, ZHAO Yong1, 2, 3. Study on Time-Resolved Characteristics of Laser-Induced Argon Plasma[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1049-1057. |
| [4] |
LI Ming-liang1, DAI Yu-jia1, QIN Shuang1, SONG Chao2*, GAO Xun1*, LIN Jing-quan1. Influence of LIBS Analysis Model on Quantitative Analysis Precision of Aluminum Alloy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 587-591. |
| [5] |
GONG Zheng1, LIN Jing-jun2*, LIN Xiao-mei3*, HUANG Yu-tao1. Effect of Heating and Cooling on the Characteristic Lines of Al During Melting[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 598-602. |
| [6] |
QIN Shuang1, LI Ming-liang1, DAI Yu-jia1, GAO Xun1*, SONG Chao2*, LIN Jing-quan1. The Accuracy Improvement of Fe Element in Aluminum Alloy by Millisecond Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Under Spatial Confinement Combined With Support Vector Machine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 582-586. |
| [7] |
XU Yu-ting1, SUN Hao-ran2, GAO Xun1*, GUO Kai-min3*, LIN Jing-quan1. Identification of Pork Parts Based on LIBS Technology Combined With PCA-SVM Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3572-3576. |
| [8] |
DENG Fan1, HU Zhen-lin2, CUI Hao-hao2, ZHANG Deng2, TANG Yun4, ZHAO Zhi-fang2, ZENG Qing-dong2, 3*, GUO Lian-bo2*. Progress in the Correction of Self-Absorption Effect on Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 2989-2998. |
| [9] |
YOU Wen1, XIA Yang-peng1, HUANG Yu-tao1, LIN Jing-jun2*, LIN Xiao-mei3*. Research on Selection Method of LIBS Feature Variables Based on CART Regression Tree[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3240-3244. |
| [10] |
YANG Wen-feng1*, QIAN Zi-ran1, CAO Yu2, WEI Gui-ming1, ZHU De-hua2, WANG Feng3, FU Chan-yuan1. Research on the Controllability of Aircraft Skin Laser Paint Remove Based on Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectrum and Composition Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3233-3239. |
| [11] |
HE Ya-xiong1, ZHOU Wen-qi1, KE Chuan2, XU Tao1*, ZHAO Yong1, 2. Review of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy in Gas Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2681-2687. |
| [12] |
CHEN Geng-yin1, ZHANG Qi-hang1, LIU Yu-zhu1, 2*, ZHANGCHENG Yuan-zhe1, CHEN Yu1, CHEN Guo-qing1, HAN Bo-yuan1, ABULIMITI Bumaliya3*. Online Detection of VOCs Based on LIBS and Raman Spectra[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2729-2733. |
| [13] |
WANG Ya-bing1，2, SHAO Shang-kun1，2, SUN Xue-peng1，2, ZHANG Xiao-yun1，2, LI Hui-quan1，2, SUN Tian-xi1，2*. Determination of Parameters of X-Ray Source Based on Tapered Glass Monocapillary X-Ray Condenser[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2812-2816. |
| [14] |
LIAO Wen-long1, LIU Kun-ping2, HU Jian-ping1, GAN Ya1, LIN Qing-yu3, DUAN Yi-xiang3*. Research Advances and Trends of Rapid Detection Technologies for Pathogenic Bacteria Based on Fingerprint Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2372-2377. |
| [15] |
LI Wen-xin1, CHEN Guang-hui1, 3, ZENG Qing-dong1, 2*, YUAN Meng-tian1, 3, HE Wu-guang1, JIANG Ze-fang1, LIU Yang1, NIE Chang-jiang1, YU Hua-qing1, GUO Lian-bo2. Rapid Classification of Steel by a Mobile Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Based on Optical Fiber Delivering Laser Energy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2638-2643. |
|
|
|
|
