|
|
|
|
|
|
| Influence of LIBS Analysis Model on Quantitative Analysis Precision of Aluminum Alloy |
| LI Ming-liang1, DAI Yu-jia1, QIN Shuang1, SONG Chao2*, GAO Xun1*, LIN Jing-quan1 |
1. School of Science, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
2. School of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract In order to improve the accuracy of quantitative analysis of aluminum alloy, a quantitative analysis model of Cu element in aluminum alloy was established by combining laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with multivariate linear regression, median Gaussian kernel support vector machine regression and standardized partial least squares regression. Third order minimum background removal and wavelet threshold denoising were performed on the collected LIBS spectra to improve the SNR of LIBS spectra. The optimal training set and prediction set were selected from the processed data. The calibration model was established using multi variable linear regression method, medium Gaussian kernel support vector machine regression method and normalized partial least squares fitting regression method. Two characteristic lines of Cu Ⅰ 324.80 nm and Cu Ⅰ 327.43 nm and Libs spectral data in the range of 323～329 nm were used for quantitative analysis. The fitting coefficient (R2), root mean square error (RMSEC), root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) and average relative error (ARE) of the three Libs quantitative analysis models were compared and analyzed. The results show that compared with the multivariable linear regression method and medium Gaussian kernel support vector machine regression method, the precision and accuracy of the standardized PLSR model are significantly improved for the quantitative analysis of Cu element in aluminum alloy, and the R2, RMSEC, RMSEP and ARE of the Libs calibration curves are 0.997, 0.014 Wt%, 0.129 Wt% and 3.053%, respectively. The results show that the standardized PLSR method has more advantages in improving the accuracy and generalization of the calibration model, and can effectively reduce the influence of parameter fluctuation and self-absorption effect on the quantitative analysis of aluminum alloy.
|
|
Received: 2021-01-16
Accepted: 2021-02-17
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
SONG Chao, GAO Xun
E-mail: songchao@cust.edu.cn; lasercust@163.com
|
|
[1] Ubani Ochoa N C, Cone D M, Stafford S W, et al. Journal of Space Safety Engineering, 2020，8(1)：4.
[2] Kicheol Hong, Hyeji Park, Yunsung Kim, et al. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2019, 98: 213.
[3] Xiong Huiyuan, Tan Zhirong, Zhang Ronghui, et al. Nanotechnology Reviews, 2019, 8(1): 370.
[4] Gondal M A, Aldakheel R K, Almessiere M A, et al. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2020, 183: 113153.
[5] Hadioui Madjid, Knapp Geneviève, Azimzada Agil, et al. Analytical Chemistry, 2019, 91(20): 13275.
[6] Sabina Berisha, Igor Živkovic′, Joe Kotnik, et al. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2020, 25: 233.
[7] Wang Zhi, Chu Yanwu, Chen Feng, et al. Applied Optics, 2019, 58(27): 7615.
[8] Han Jung Hyun, Moon Youngmin, Lee Jong Jin, et al. Biomedical Optics Express, 2016, 7(1): 57.
[9] LIN Xiao-mei, GUO Ming, GAO Xun, et al(林晓梅, 郭 明, 高 勋，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(6): 1953.
[10] Poggialini F, Fiocco G, Campanella B, et al. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2020, 44: 275.
[11] Redoglio Daniele A, Palazzo Natascia, Migliorini Francesca, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2018, 72(4): 584.
[12] Yao Mingyin, Rao Gangfu, Huang Lin, et al. Applied Optics, 2017, 56(29): 8148.
[13] Taoreed O Owolabi, Mohammed A Gondal. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 35(6): 6277.
[14] Wang Ping, Li Nan, Yan Chunhua, et al. Analytical Methods, 2019, 11(27): 3419.
|
| [1] |
ZHANG Xing-long1, LIU Yu-zhu1, 2*, SUN Zhong-mou1, ZHANG Qi-hang1, CHEN Yu1, MAYALIYA·Abulimiti3*. Online Monitoring of Pesticides Based on Laser Induced Breakdown
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1711-1715. |
| [2] |
YANG Lin-yu1, 2, 3, DING Yu1, 2, 3*, ZHAN Ye4, ZHU Shao-nong1, 2, 3, CHEN Yu-juan1, 2, 3, DENG Fan1, 2, 3, ZHAO Xing-qiang1, 2, 3. Quantitative Analysis of Mn and Ni Elements in Steel Based on LIBS and GA-PLS[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1804-1808. |
| [3] |
HAN Bing1, SUN Dan-dan2*, WAN Wei-hao1, WANG Hui3, DONG Cai-chang2, ZHAO Lei3, WANG Hai-zhou3*. Element Segregation of Cast-Rolled 7B05 Aluminum Alloy Based on
Microbeam X-Ray Fluorescence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1413-1419. |
| [4] |
HE Ya-xiong1, 2, ZHOU Wen-qi1, 2, ZHUANG Bin1, 2, ZHANG Yong-sheng1, 2, KE Chuan3, XU Tao1, 2*, ZHAO Yong1, 2, 3. Study on Time-Resolved Characteristics of Laser-Induced Argon Plasma[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1049-1057. |
| [5] |
GONG Zheng1, LIN Jing-jun2*, LIN Xiao-mei3*, HUANG Yu-tao1. Effect of Heating and Cooling on the Characteristic Lines of Al During Melting[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 598-602. |
| [6] |
QIN Shuang1, LI Ming-liang1, DAI Yu-jia1, GAO Xun1*, SONG Chao2*, LIN Jing-quan1. The Accuracy Improvement of Fe Element in Aluminum Alloy by Millisecond Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Under Spatial Confinement Combined With Support Vector Machine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 582-586. |
| [7] |
WANG Ya-wen1,2,3, ZHANG Yong4, CHEN Xiong-fei1,2,3, LIU Ying1,2,3, ZHAO Zhen-yang4, YE Ming-guo5, XU Yu-xing6, LIU Peng-yu1,2,3*. Quantitative Analysis of Nickel-Based Superalloys Based on a Remote LIBS System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 603-608. |
| [8] |
XU Yu-ting1, SUN Hao-ran2, GAO Xun1*, GUO Kai-min3*, LIN Jing-quan1. Identification of Pork Parts Based on LIBS Technology Combined With PCA-SVM Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3572-3576. |
| [9] |
DENG Fan1, HU Zhen-lin2, CUI Hao-hao2, ZHANG Deng2, TANG Yun4, ZHAO Zhi-fang2, ZENG Qing-dong2, 3*, GUO Lian-bo2*. Progress in the Correction of Self-Absorption Effect on Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 2989-2998. |
| [10] |
YOU Wen1, XIA Yang-peng1, HUANG Yu-tao1, LIN Jing-jun2*, LIN Xiao-mei3*. Research on Selection Method of LIBS Feature Variables Based on CART Regression Tree[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3240-3244. |
| [11] |
YANG Wen-feng1*, QIAN Zi-ran1, CAO Yu2, WEI Gui-ming1, ZHU De-hua2, WANG Feng3, FU Chan-yuan1. Research on the Controllability of Aircraft Skin Laser Paint Remove Based on Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectrum and Composition Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3233-3239. |
| [12] |
HE Ya-xiong1, ZHOU Wen-qi1, KE Chuan2, XU Tao1*, ZHAO Yong1, 2. Review of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy in Gas Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2681-2687. |
| [13] |
CHEN Geng-yin1, ZHANG Qi-hang1, LIU Yu-zhu1, 2*, ZHANGCHENG Yuan-zhe1, CHEN Yu1, CHEN Guo-qing1, HAN Bo-yuan1, ABULIMITI Bumaliya3*. Online Detection of VOCs Based on LIBS and Raman Spectra[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2729-2733. |
| [14] |
LIAO Wen-long1, LIU Kun-ping2, HU Jian-ping1, GAN Ya1, LIN Qing-yu3, DUAN Yi-xiang3*. Research Advances and Trends of Rapid Detection Technologies for Pathogenic Bacteria Based on Fingerprint Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2372-2377. |
| [15] |
LI Wen-xin1, CHEN Guang-hui1, 3, ZENG Qing-dong1, 2*, YUAN Meng-tian1, 3, HE Wu-guang1, JIANG Ze-fang1, LIU Yang1, NIE Chang-jiang1, YU Hua-qing1, GUO Lian-bo2. Rapid Classification of Steel by a Mobile Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Based on Optical Fiber Delivering Laser Energy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2638-2643. |
|
|
|
|
