|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimation of Grassland Aboveground Biomass From UAV-Mounted Hyperspectral Image by Optimized Spectral Reconstruction |
KANG Xiao-yan1,2, ZHANG Ai-wu1,2*, PANG Hai-yang1,2 |
1. Key Laboratory of 3D Information Acquisition and Application, Ministry of Education, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
2. Engineering Research Center of Spatial Information Technology, Ministry of Education, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China |
|
|
Abstract The accurate and timely estimation of above-ground biomass (AGB) is crucial for grassland monitoring and rational grazing. The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based hyperspectral remote sensing can obtain images with high spatial, spectral and radiometric resolutions in a short time and has been widely used in many fields such as precision agricultural and high-throughput plant phenotype. To explore the applicability of UAV-based hyperspectral image (UAV-HSI) in grassland AGB prediction, we collected UAV-HSI, grassland AGB, and relevant auxiliary data in a grassland sample area of Qinghai Province. However, it is not only inconvenient to widely collect, store and transmit, but also inefficient in data processing for UAV-HSI because of large data volumes, which may restrict practices of UAV-HIS widely. For resolving the above problems, a spectral reconstruction and optimization method considering both data simplification and spectral fidelity was proposed, attempting to ensure the performance of grassland AGB prediction and effective reduction of data volumes. First, using the residual quantization, we obtained several binary cubes (Hi) and corresponding coefficient matrices (βi) with low volumes. Hi and βi can replace the original data for storage and transmission. Second, preliminarily reconstructed spectra (PRS) can be produced by Hi and βi. Third, through the Savitzky-Golay (SG) filter, optimized PRS (OPRS) can be achieved by enhancing the spectral fidelity. To demonstrate the effectiveness of OPRS, we carried out the spectral fidelity experiment. Taking a grassland canopy spectrum as an example, three fidelity indices, i. e., the spectral vector distance (SVD), spectral correlation coefficient (SCC), and spectral angle mapping (SAM), were analyzed. Results showed that, on the three fidelity indices, OPRS was superior to PRS. And then, the correlations between AGB and OPRS bands were discussed. Compared with raw spectra and PRS, OPRS achieved the relatively high and most stable potential in forage AGB prediction. Furthermore, the partial least squares regression (PLSR) was used to calibrate models of grassland AGB prediction. Results demonstrated that, among raw spectra, order -1 to -4 PRS, and order -1 to -4 OPRS, The prediction performances of order -4 and -3 OPRS reached the optimal and sub-optimal levels with RPD (the ratio of performance to deviation)=2.31 and 2.23, respectively. Their RPD values were 0.26 and 0.18 higher than that of the original spectra, respectively. Therefore, with a reduction of one order of magnitude, OPRS achieved a better performance than the original spectrum in the grassland AGB prediction. In other words, OPRS had advantages with both data simplification and accurate grassland AGB prediction. This study provides a new solution to estimate grassland AGB for UAV-HIS effectively.
|
Received: 2019-07-13
Accepted: 2020-02-26
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Ai-wu
E-mail: zhangaw98@163.com
|
|
[1] Wu J S, Fu G. Remote Sensing Letters, 2018, 9(2): 150.
[2] Naidoo Laven, Deventer Heidi van, Ramoelo Abel, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 2019, 78: 118.
[3] John R, Chen J, Giannico V, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 213: 34.
[4] KANG Xiao-yan, ZHANG Ai-wu(康孝岩, 张爱武). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2019, 35(23): 161.
[5] Wang Feilong, Wang Fumin, Zhang Yao, et al. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10(4): 453.
[6] Surovy P, Kuzelka K. Forests, 2019, 10(3): 273.
[7] Capolupo A, Kooistra L, Berendonk C, et al. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information,2015, 4(4): 2792.
[8] LIU Jian-gang, ZHAO Chun-jiang, YANG Gui-jun, et al(刘建刚, 赵春江, 杨贵军, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2016, 32(24): 98.
[9] Cao R, Chen Y, Shen M, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 217: 244.
[10] Huang J, Shi T, Gong B, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2018, 72(11): 1632.
[11] Bellon-Maurel V, Fernandez-Ahumada E, Palagos B, et al. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2010, 29(9): 1073. |
[1] |
LIU Zhen1*, LIU Li2*, FAN Shuo2, ZHAO An-ran2, LIU Si-lu2. Training Sample Selection for Spectral Reconstruction Based on Improved K-Means Clustering[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 29-35. |
[2] |
ZHU Wen-jing1, 2,FENG Zhan-kang1, 2,DAI Shi-yuan1, 2,ZHANG Ping-ping3,JI Wen4,WANG Ai-chen1, 2,WEI Xin-hua1, 2*. Multi-Feature Fusion Detection of Wheat Lodging Information Based on UAV Multispectral Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 197-206. |
[3] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
[4] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[5] |
LIANG Jin-xing1, 2, 3, XIN Lei1, CHENG Jing-yao1, ZHOU Jing1, LUO Hang1, 3*. Adaptive Weighted Spectral Reconstruction Method Against
Exposure Variation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3330-3338. |
[6] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[7] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
[8] |
WANG Yu-chen1, 2, KONG Ling-qin1, 2, 3*, ZHAO Yue-jin1, 2, 3, DONG Li-quan1, 2, 3*, LIU Ming1, 2, 3, HUI Mei1, 2. Hyperspectral Reconstruction From RGB Images for Tissue Oxygen
Saturation Assessment[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3193-3201. |
[9] |
FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, FAN Yi-guang1, TAO Hui-lin1, YANG Fu-qin3, YANG Gui-jun1, ZHAO Chun-jiang1, 2*. Monitoring of Nitrogen Content in Winter Wheat Based on UAV
Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3239-3246. |
[10] |
FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, YUE Ji-bo3, FAN Yi-guang2, YANG Gui-jun2, ZHAO Chun-jiang1, 2*. Estimation of Potato Above-Ground Biomass Based on VGC-AGB Model and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2876-2884. |
[11] |
JIN Chun-bai1, YANG Guang1*, LU Shan2*, LIU Wen-jing1, LI De-jun1, ZHENG Nan1. Band Selection Method Based on Target Saliency Analysis in Spatial Domain[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2952-2959. |
[12] |
GAO Yu1, SUN Xue-jian1*, LI Guang-hua2, ZHANG Li-fu1, QU Liang2, ZHANG Dong-hui1, CHANG Jing-jing2, DAI Xiao-ai3. Study on the Derivation of Paper Viscosity Spectral Index Based on Spectral Information Expansion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2960-2966. |
[13] |
SUN Bang-yong1, YU Meng-ying1, YAO Qi2*. Research on Spectral Reconstruction Method From RGB Imaging Based on Dual Attention Mechanism[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2687-2693. |
[14] |
KONG Bo1, YU Huan2*, SONG Wu-jie2, 3, HOU Yu-ting2, XIANG Qing2. Hyperspectral Characteristics and Quantitative Remote Sensing Inversion of Gravel Grain Size in the North Tibetan Plateau[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2381-2390. |
[15] |
XIA Chen-zhen1, 2, 3, JIANG Yan-yan4, ZHANG Xing-yu1, 2, 3, SHA Ye5, CUI Shuai1, 2, 3, MI Guo-hua5, GAO Qiang1, 2, 3, ZHANG Yue1, 2, 3*. Estimation of Soil Organic Matter in Maize Field of Black Soil Area Based on UAV Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2617-2626. |
|
|
|
|