|
|
|
|
|
|
On-Orbit Analysis and Correction of the Inconsistency in the Response Characteristics of TG-2/MAI CCD Pixels |
GUO Jun-jie1,2,3,4, YAO Zhi-gang1,4,5*, HAN Zhi-gang1,4, ZHAO Zeng-liang1,4, YAN Wei3, JIANG Jun1,4 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Geo-Information Engineering, Xi’an 710054, China
2. Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center, Taiyuan 030027, China
3. College of Meteorology and Oceanology, National University of Defense Technology, Nanjing 211101, China
4. Beijing Institute of Applied Meteorology, Beijing 100029, China
5. Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China |
|
|
Abstract The difference in the response characteristics of charge-coupled device (CCD) pixels is one of the main factors restricting the quality of the Multi-angle Polarization Imager (MAI) and its quantitative application. In order to improve the quality of CCD imaging, this paper used a total of 104,403 frames of observational data from September 2016 to March 2018, based on the full-range multi-section analysis and correction method, to realize the analysis and correction for the inconsistency in the pixel response characteristics of MAI polarized and non-polarized channels. And the results were verified using the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment 2 (GOME-2) and Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data. Firstly, assuming there are sufficient observational samples, that is, the objects observed by each pixel have the same ergodicity, and the average Digital Number (DN) value of all samples corresponding to each CCD pixel could represent the response characteristics of each pixel of the CCD. Secondly, constructing reference images for each channel by using 104 403 frames observation data, and the 5×5 pixels in the CCD center are used as standard DN values corresponding to each reference image. Next, the response characteristics of the MAI polarized and non-polarized channels are analyzed respectively. The results show that there is significant inconsistency in the response characteristics in each MAI pixel and each channel. The inconsistency in each channel falls roughly between 4% and 10%. And for polarized channels, the inconsistencies in the pixel response characteristics between the three polarized channels in the same polarization band have some similarities, but there are certain differences, and the difference in pixel response inconsistency is basically within 1%. Then, the observational data for two years are divided into two periods for comparative analysis. The result shows that the CCD pixel response characteristics do not decay over time. This also shows that the amount of reference image data is sufficient, which further rerifies the rationality of the above assumptions. Therefore, the full-range multi-section correction method can be used to correct the inconsistency of each pixel’s response characteristics on a channel-by-channel basis. After correction was performed based on this method, the image quality of MAI is significantly improved. The dependence on the observational zenith angle of the CCD pixel response is significant. The image is smoother, and the graininess is basically eliminated. Also, the scenes of some areas have changed-especially targets with a reflectivity between low and medium reflectivity, such as broken cloud and so on. Compared with GOME-2, the average absolute deviations between the reflectance of the MAI 565, 670, and 763 nm bands and the GOME-2 reference reflectance are reduced from 1.6%, 4.2%, and 2.2% to 0.5%, 2.6%, and 0.4% after correction, respectively. In addition, the cloud detection result based on the multi-band cloud identification method shows that, compared with the MODIS cloud detection product at a similar time, the corrected MAI cloud detection result looks more accurate. Therefore, the full-range multi-section analysis and correction method can realize the monitoring and correction of the inconsistency in the response characteristics of the MAI CCD pixels, which significantly improves the quality of the on-orbit observations of this instrument. And this method can also be applied to the on-orbit calibration of other CCD instruments.
|
Received: 2018-10-10
Accepted: 2019-02-15
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
YAO Zhi-gang
E-mail: yzg_biam@163.com
|
|
[1] Luo G, Chutatape O, Fang H. Applied Optics, 2001, 40(26): 4716.
[2] Wang Q Y. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2003, 343.
[3] Zhai G. Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2013, 8892: 7080.
[4] Liu C, Li N, Shi J, et al. Journal of Electronic Measurement & Instrumentation, 2015, 116: 55.
[5] Wang W, He B, Han S L, et al. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2010, 18(6): 1420.
[6] Zhu H Y. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012.
[7] Qu H F, Wang X D, Lv B L, et al. Chinese Journal of Liquid Crystals and Displays, 2012, 27(4): 569.
[8] Wang D J, Shen H H, Song Y L, et al. Acta Optica Sinica, 2012, 41(2): 232.
[9] Xiu J H, Huang P, Li J, et al. Acta Optica Sinica, 2013, 33(7): 0711003.
[10] Deschamps P Y, Breon F M, Leroy M, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 1994, 32(3): 598.
[11] Laherrere J M, Poutier L, Bretdibat T, et al. Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 1997, 3221: 132.
[12] Hagolle O, Goloub P, Deschamps P Y, et al. IEEE Trans on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 1999, 37(3): 1550.
[13] Bretdibat T, Andre Y, Laherrere J M. SPIE’s 1995 International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation, 1995.
[14] Cosnefroy H, Soule P, Briottet P, et al. Aerospace Remote Sensing. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1997. 141.
[15] Jiang J, Han Z G, Yao Z G, et al.Proceedings of the Tiangong-2 Remote Sensing Application Conference,2019, 541: 130.
[16] Guo J J, Yao Z G, Han Z G, et al. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2018, 33(3): 439.
[17] Guo J J, Yao Z G, Han Z G, et al. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2019, 46(1): 0110001.
[18] Guo J J, Yao Z G, Han Z G, et al. Proceedings of the Tiangong-2 Remote Sensing Application Conference, 2019, 541: 144.
[19] Fan X H, Chen H B, Lin L F, et al. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2009, 26(6): 1099.
[20] Fan X H, Chen H B, Lin L F, et al. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2009, 13(1): 137.
[21] Yao Z G, Han Z G, Zhao Z L, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114(9): 1910.
[22] Guo Junjie, Yao Zhigang, Han Zhigang, et al. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2019, 39(1): 56. |
[1] |
LIN Hong-jian1, ZHAI Juan1*, LAI Wan-chang1, ZENG Chen-hao1, 2, ZHAO Zi-qi1, SHI Jie1, ZHOU Jin-ge1. Determination of Mn, Co, Ni in Ternary Cathode Materials With
Homologous Correction EDXRF Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3436-3444. |
[2] |
HUANG Meng-qiang1, KUANG Wen-jian2, 3*, LIU Xiang1, HE Liang4. Quantitative Analysis of Cotton/Polyester/Wool Blended Fiber Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3565-3570. |
[3] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[4] |
CHAI Shu1, PENG Hai-meng1, WU Wen-dong1, 2*. Acoustic-Based Spectral Correction Method for Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy in High Temperature Environment[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1401-1407. |
[5] |
JIANG Jun1, 2, YAO Zhi-gang1, 2*. Dynamic Detection and Correction for Abnormal Response of CCD Pixels in Spaceborne Low-Light Imager[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1175-1182. |
[6] |
ZHANG Le-wen1, 2, WANG Qian-jin1, 3, SUN Peng-shuai1, PANG Tao1, WU Bian1, XIA Hua1, ZHANG Zhi-rong1, 3, 4, 5*. Analysis of Interference Factors and Study of Temperature Correction Method in Gas Detection by Laser Absorption Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 767-773. |
[7] |
HU Xiao-yun1, BIAN Xi-hui1, 2, 3*, XIANG Yang2, ZHANG Huan1, WEI Jun-fu1. Quantitative Analysis of Single Component Oils in Quinary Blend Oil by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Chemometrics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 78-84. |
[8] |
ZHU Chen-guang1, LIU Ya-jun2, LI Xin-xing1, 3, GONG Wei-wei4*, GUO Wei1. Detection Method of Freshness of Penaeus Vannamei Based on
Hyperspectral[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 107-110. |
[9] |
CHEN Yong1, 2, GUO Yun-zhu1, WANG Wei3*, WU Xiao-hong1, 2*, JIA Hong-wen4, WU Bin4. Clustering Analysis of FTIR Spectra Using Fuzzy K-Harmonic-Kohonen Clustering Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 268-272. |
[10] |
LIAN Xiao-qin1, 2, CHEN Yan-ming1, 2, WANG Yu-qiao1, 2, LIU Yu1, 2. Research on ICP-AES Spectral Baseline Correction Method Based on DE Algorithm and NURBS Curve[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 260-267. |
[11] |
CHEN Su-yi, LI Hao-ran, DAI Ji-sheng*. Baseline Correction Method Based on Block Sparse Signal Recovery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3730-3735. |
[12] |
HE Nian, SHAN Peng*, HE Zhong-hai, WANG Qiao-yun, LI Zhi-gang, WU Zhui. Study on the Fractional Baseline Correction Method of ATR-FTIR
Spectral Signal in the Fermentation Process of Sodium Glutamate[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1848-1854. |
[13] |
YAN Hua1, LIU Xing-hua2, DING Yong3, ZHAO Zhi1, LUO Yong-feng1, WU Yu-hong1, YAN Peng1, DONG Lu1, WANG Da-xi4. Instantaneous Emission Spectra and Mechanism Study on the Reaction of ClF3O and n-Decane[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1522-1528. |
[14] |
SUN Hua-sheng1, ZHANG Yuan2*, SHI Yun-fei1, ZHAO Min1. A New Method for Direct Measurement of Land Surface Reflectance With UAV-Based Multispectral Cameras[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1581-1587. |
[15] |
CHENG Jie-hong1, CHEN Zheng-guang1, 2*, YI Shu-juan2. Wavelength Selection Algorithm Based on Minimum Correlation Coefficient for Multivariate Calibration[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 719-725. |
|
|
|
|