|
|
|
|
|
|
| Determination of Chinese Honey Adulterated with Syrups by Near Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Chemometrics |
| HUANG Fu-rong1, SONG Han1, GUO Liu1, YANG Xin-hao1, LI Li-qun2, ZHAO Hong-xia2*, YANG Mao-xun3* |
1. Opto-electronic Department of Jinan University，Guangzhou 510632，China
2. Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Guangzhou 510636，China
3. Zhuhai Dahengqin Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., Zhuhai 519000，China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract To find a fast, accurate, and effective method for the identification of honey adulteration, near-infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics was used to analyze natural honey and adulterated honey in this paper. First, 224 samples were collected for the study, including 112 natural pure honey samples from 20 common honeys in China, and 112 adulterated honey sample were prepared with 6 different syrup samples according to different syrup contents(10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, or 60%). Near infrared spectral data (wavelength range of 400～2 500 nm) of all samples were obtained by near infrared light instrument scanning. Then, first derivative (FD), second derivative (SD), multiple scattering correction (MSC), and standard normal variation (SNVT) pre-processing of the original spectra combined with PLS-DA (linear algorithm) and SVM (non-linear algorithm) modeling, respectively, were adopted to establish a differential model of natural honey and syrup-adulterated honey and compare the effects of different pretreatment methods on the honey adulteration identification model established by the two different modeling algorithms. The penalty parameter c and the kernel function parameter g of the SVM algorithm were optimized by three optimization algorithms: grid search, genetic algorithm, and particle swarm optimization. The analysis results showed that the PLS-DA model established by the FD preprocessing had the best effect, and the accuracy of the best PLS-DA model was 87.50%. After MSC pre-processing, the SVM model with the penalty parameter c of 3.031 4 and the kernel function parameter g of 0.329 8 was the best. The accuracy of the best SVM model was 94.64%. It can be seen that the non-linear SVM algorithm combined with the NIR spectral data natural honey and syrup-adulterated honey identification model is better than the PLS-DA model.
|
|
Received: 2019-07-28
Accepted: 2019-09-25
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHAO Hong-xia, YANG Mao-xun
E-mail: hxzh110@126.com；yangmaoxun1980@163.com
|
|
[1] Arroyo-Manzanares N, García-Nicolás M, Castell A, et al. Talanta, 2019, 205（1）: 120123.
[2] Puscas A, Hosu A, Cimpoiu C, et al. Journal of Chromatography A, 2013, 1272（1）: 132.
[3] Gan Z L, Yang Y, Li J, et al. Journal of Food Engineering, 2016, 178: 151.
[4] Çinar S B, Eksi A, Coskun I. Food Chemistry, 2014, 157: 10.
[5] Guler A, Kocaokutgen H, Garipoglu A V, et al. Food Chemistry, 2014, 155: 155.
[6] Li S, Zhang X, Shan Y, et al. Food Chemistry, 2017, 218: 231.
[7] Naila A, Flint S H, Sulaiman A Z, et al. Food Control, 2018, 90: 152.
[8] Guelpa A, Marini F, Plessis A D, et al. Food Control, 2017, 73（8）: 1388.
[9] Chen L Z, Xue X F, Ye Z H, et al. Food Chemistry, 2011, 12（4）8: 1110.
[10] ZHANG Yan-nan, CHEN Lan-zhen, XUE Xiao-feng, et al(张妍楠, 陈兰珍, 薛晓锋, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2015, 35(9): 2536.
[11] Bazar G, Romvari R, Szabo A. Food Chemistry, 2016, 194: 873.
[12] Akay M F, Abut F, Lu M, et al. Neural Computing and Applications, 2016, 27(6): 1785.
[13] Gao X, Hou J. Neurocomputing, 2015, 174: 906.
[14] Galvão R K H, Araujo M C U, José G E, et al. Talanta, 2005, 67(4): 736. |
| [1] |
GAO Feng1, 2, XING Ya-ge3, 4, LUO Hua-ping1, 2, ZHANG Yuan-hua3, 4, GUO Ling3, 4*. Nondestructive Identification of Apricot Varieties Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 44-51. |
| [2] |
BAO Hao1, 2，ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
| [3] |
HU Cai-ping1, HE Cheng-yu2, KONG Li-wei3, ZHU You-you3*, WU Bin4, ZHOU Hao-xiang3, SUN Jun2. Identification of Tea Based on Near-Infrared Spectra and Fuzzy Linear Discriminant QR Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3802-3805. |
| [4] |
LIU Xin-peng1, SUN Xiang-hong2, QIN Yu-hua1*, ZHANG Min1, GONG Hui-li3. Research on t-SNE Similarity Measurement Method Based on Wasserstein Divergence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3806-3812. |
| [5] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
| [6] |
WANG Qi-biao1, HE Yu-kai1, LUO Yu-shi1, WANG Shu-jun1, XIE Bo2, DENG Chao2*, LIU Yong3, TUO Xian-guo3. Study on Analysis Method of Distiller's Grains Acidity Based on
Convolutional Neural Network and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3726-3731. |
| [7] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
| [8] |
ZHANG Shu-fang1, LEI Lei2, LEI Shun-xin2, TAN Xue-cai1, LIU Shao-gang1, YAN Jun1*. Traceability of Geographical Origin of Jasmine Based on Near
Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3389-3395. |
| [9] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
| [10] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
| [11] |
HUANG Meng-qiang1, KUANG Wen-jian2, 3*, LIU Xiang1, HE Liang4. Quantitative Analysis of Cotton/Polyester/Wool Blended Fiber Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3565-3570. |
| [12] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
| [13] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
| [14] |
KANG Ming-yue1, 3, WANG Cheng1, SUN Hong-yan3, LI Zuo-lin2, LUO Bin1*. Research on Internal Quality Detection Method of Cherry Tomatoes Based on Improved WOA-LSSVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3541-3550. |
| [15] |
HUANG Hua1, LIU Ya2, KUERBANGULI·Dulikun1, ZENG Fan-lin1, MAYIRAN·Maimaiti1, AWAGULI·Maimaiti1, MAIDINUERHAN·Aizezi1, GUO Jun-xian3*. Ensemble Learning Model Incorporating Fractional Differential and
PIMP-RF Algorithm to Predict Soluble Solids Content of Apples
During Maturing Period[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3059-3066. |
|
|
|
|
