| 光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
| A Hyperspectral Subpixel Target Detection Method Based on Inverse Least Squares Method |
| LI Qing-bo,NIE Xin,ZHANG Guang-jun* |
| Key Laboratory of Precision Opto-Mechatronics Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Instrument Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the present paper, an inverse least square (ILS) method combined with the Mahalanobis distance outlier detection method is discussed to detect the subpixel target from the hyperspectral image. Firstly, the inverse model for the target spectrum and all the pixel spectra was established, in which the accurate target spectrum was obtained previously, and then the SNV algorithm was employed to preprocess each original pixel spectra separately. After the pretreatment, the regressive coefficient of ILS was calculated with partial least square (PLS) algorithm. Each point in the vector of regressive coefficient corresponds to a pixel in the image. The Mahalanobis distance was calculated with each point in the regressive coefficient vector. Because Mahalanobis distance stands for the extent to which samples deviate from the total population, the point with Mahalanobis distance larger than the 3σ was regarded as the subpixel target. In this algorithm, no other prior information such as representative background spectrum or modeling of background is required, and only the target spectrum is needed. In addition, the result of the detection is insensitive to the complexity of background. This method was applied to AVIRIS remote sensing data. For this simulation experiment, AVIRIS remote sensing data was free downloaded from the NASA official websit, the spectrum of a ground object in the AVIRIS hyperspectral image was picked up as the target spectrum, and the subpixel target was simulated though a linear mixed method. The comparison of the subpixel detection result of the method mentioned above with that of orthogonal subspace projection method (OSP) was performed. The result shows that the performance of the ILS method is better than the traditional OSP method. The ROC (receive operating characteristic curve) and SNR were calculated, which indicates that the ILS method possesses higher detection accuracy and less computing time than the OSP algorithm.
|
|
Received: 2007-12-16
Accepted: 2008-03-18
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Guang-jun
E-mail: gjzhang@buaa.edu.cn
|
|
[1] PU Rui-liang, GONG Peng(浦瑞良，宫 鹏). Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and Its Applications(高光谱遥感及其应用). Beijing：Higher Education Press(北京：高等教育出版社), 2000. 1.
[2] GUO Shi-de, MA Ting, LIN Xu-dong(郭仕德，马 廷，林旭东). Science of Surveying and Mapping(测绘科学), 2005, 30(3): 35.
[3] LU Wei, YU Xu-chu, YANG Guo-peng, et al(路 威，余旭初，杨国鹏，等). Hydrographic Surveying and Charting(海洋测绘), 2005, 25(2): 21.
[4] GONG Yan-jun, WANG Yan-hong, YU Bing-xi(宫彦军，王艳红，禹秉熙). Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis NeiMongol(内蒙古大学学报), 2003, 34(2): 231.
[5] Harsanyi Joseph C, Chang Chein-I. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1994, 32(4): 779.
[6] Ren Hsuan. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2003, 39(4): 1232.
[7] Reed Irving S, Yu Xiaoli. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, 1990, 38(10): 1760.
[8] Yu Xiaoli, Hoff Lawrence E, Reed Irving S, et al. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 1997, 6(1): 143.
[9] Yu Xiaoli, Reed Irving S, Stocker Alan D. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1993, 41(8): 2639.
[10] Nicolls Fred, de Jager Gerhard. Signal Processing, 2007, 87: 841.
[11] Yu Xiaoli, Reed Irving S. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1995, 43(12): 2953.
[12] Feudale Robert N, Brown Steven D. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2005, 77: 75.
[13] RAO Ping, CHEN Sheng-bo, HE Yue, et al(饶 萍，陈圣波，何 月，等). Global Geology(世界地质), 2006, 25(2): 201.
[14] XUE Qi, KUANG Gang-yao, LI Zhi-yong(薛 绮，匡纲要，李智勇). Remote Sensing Technology and Application(遥感技术与应用), 2004, 19(3): 197.
[15] Matthias Otto(M 奥托). Chemometrics: Statistics and Computer Application in Angalytical Chemistry(化学计量学: 统计学与计算机在分析化学中的应用). Beijing: Science Press(北京：科学出版社)，2003. 170.
[16] WANG Hui-wen(王惠文). Partial Least-Squares Regression-Method and Applications(偏最小二乘回归方法及其应用). Beijing: National Defence Industry Press(北京：国防工业出版社), 1999. 200.
[17] LIU Rong, CHEN Wen-liang, XU Ke-xin, et al(刘 蓉，陈文亮，徐可欣，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2005, 25(2): 207.
[18] WANG Jia-jun, QIU Qi-yang, LIU Wei(王家俊，邱启杨，刘 巍). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2007, 27(5): 895.
[19] LI Guo-hong, SHI Peng-fei(李国宏，施鹏飞). Acta Electronica Sinica(电子学报), 2007, 35(4): 747.
[20] GAN Zheng-ru, ZENG Xian-gui(干正如，曾宪珪). Journal of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology(江西理工大学学报), 2007, 28(4): 39.
[21] ZHOU Pei-ling, WANG Zhao-hui(周佩玲，王朝晖). Journal of Data Acquisition & Processing(数据采集与处理), 2003, 18(1): 1.
[22] LI Xiang, LI Qing-bo, XU Yi-zhuang, et al(李 响，李庆波，徐怡庄，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2007, 27(3): 439.
[23] Chang Chein-I, Zhao Xiao-Li, Althouse Mark L G, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1998, 36(3): 898.
[24] WU Bo, ZHANG Liang-pei, LI Ping-xiang(吴 波，张良培，李平湘). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2005, 9(3): 286.
[25] HE Lin, PAN Quan, ZHAO Yong-qiang(贺 霖，潘 泉，赵永强). Acta Electronica Sinica(电子学报), 2007, 35(1): 23. |
| [1] |
WANG Cai-ling1，ZHANG Jing1，WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
| [2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
| [3] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
| [4] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
| [5] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
| [6] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
| [7] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
| [8] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
| [9] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
| [10] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
| [11] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
| [12] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
| [13] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
| [14] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
| [15] |
TAO Jing-zhe1, 3, SONG De-rui1, 3, SONG Chuan-ming2, WANG Xiang-hai1, 2*. Multi-Band Remote Sensing Image Sharpening: A Survey[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2999-3008. |
|
|
|
|
