基于太赫兹时域光谱技术的CFRP薄涂层厚度检测方法

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)10-2753-08

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (4629 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract To address the challenges of substrate anisotropy, multiple reflections, echo overlap, and environmental noise in measuring thin coatings on CFRP, a coating thickness measurement method based on terahertz time-domain spectroscopy and sparse decomposition is proposed. This method has been successfully validated on simulated waveforms and real samples. CFRP composites are multilayer; each layer is typically composed of carbon fibers firmly bound with an epoxy matrix. CFRP composites are anisotropic, with variable reflection at the same location in different incidence directions and locations in the same incidence direction. As a result, the measurement accuracy of coating thickness needs to be improved when the optimization algorithm based on the theoretical model is used. In the case of thin coatings, direct differentiation of coating interfaces in the time domain is challenging due to noise and multiple reflections. Therefore, the conventional time-of-flight method(TOF) alone can't work well. To address this, sparse decomposition is utilized to locate the interfaces of thin coatings, and then the TOF is applied to calculate the thickness. Initially, the relationship between terahertz reflection signals on multilayer structures and sparse decomposition models is analyzed, and a sparse dictionary is constructed using reference signals. Then, with the prior knowledge that the propagation path of terahertz signals only changes at coating interfaces, the number of nonzero pulses in the sparse decomposition of the terahertz reflected in the number of coating layers determines the signal. Based on the above facts, the LAOMP algorithm is selected to solve the sparse representation of the terahertz-reflected signal. The LAOMP algorithm specifies the sparsity directly, facilitating the selection of sparse pulses to locate the layer interface. After obtaining the pulses corresponding to each coating interface, the thickness can be solved by TOF. Finally, this proposed method is validated for both simulated data and the samples with two coating layers. The total thickness of CFRP samples is 102 and 66 μm, respectively. The method also is compared with the classical spectral projection gradient-based L1 (SPGL1). The results show that the LAOMP algorithm can effectively detect the thin coating of 35 μm on CFRP with a small refractive index difference of adjacent coatings, and the total error of the double coating sample is less than 11% when the total thickness is 66 μm. Compared with SPGL1, the parameter tuning of the LAOMP is easier, and the decomposed sparse impulses are more stable.

Key words：Terahertz time-domain spectroscopy;Coating thickness measurement;CFRP;Sparse decomposition;Time-of-flight method

Received: 2023-08-26 Accepted: 2024-03-05

ZTFLH:

O433.4

Corresponding Authors: ZHU Mei-qiang E-mail: zhumeiqiang@cumt.edu.cn

Cite this article:

HUANG Yu-lei,LI Wei-xing,ZHU Mei-qiang, et al. Thin Coatings Thickness Detection of CFRP Based on Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(10): 2753-2760.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)10-2753-08 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2024/V44/I10/2753

[1] MA Xiao-kun, WANG Rui, HOU Jian-feng, et al(马晓坤, 王瑞, 侯建峰, 等). New Chemical Materials(化工新型材料), 2020, 48(11): 223.
[2] LI Jian-chao, HE Jing, LÜ Yu-fen, et al(李建超, 何箐, 吕玉芬, 等). China Surface Engineering(中国表面工程), 2019, 32(2): 16.
[3] WAN Yu-hong, DONG Xing-ying, WU Yu-heng, et al(万玉红, 董形影, 吴育衡, 等). Measurement and Control Technology(测控技术), 2023, 42(6): 22.
[4] Krimi S, Torosyan G, Beigang R. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 2017, 23(4): 8501112.
[5] CAO Bing-hua, ZHENG De-dong, FAN Meng-bao, et al(曹丙花, 郑德栋, 范孟豹, 等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2022, 42(1): 0112001.
[6] Wen X, Du W, Pan X, et al. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2022, 64(4): 1067.
[7] Im K H, Yang I Y, Kim S K, et al. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2016, 30: 4413.
[8] ZHANG Hong-zhen, HE Ming-xia, SHI Li-li, et al(张洪桢, 何明霞, 石粒力, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2020, 40(10): 3066.
[9] Chen Y, Huang S, Pickwell-MacPherson E. Optics Express, 2010, 18(2): 1177.
[10] Xu Y, Wang X, Zhang L, et al. NDT & E International, 2021, 124: 102536.
[11] JIAO Li-cheng, YANG Shu-yuan, LIU Fang, et al(焦李成, 杨淑媛, 刘芳, 等). Acta Electronica Sinica(电子学报), 2011, 39(7): 1651.
[12] LI Qing-quan, WANG Huan(李清泉, 王欢). Journal of Geomatics(测绘地理信息), 2019, 44(4): 1.
[13] Zhang G M, Zhang C Z, Harvey D M. Ultrasonics, 2012, 52(3): 351.
[14] DAI Qiong-hai, FU Chang-jun, JI Xiang-yang(戴琼海, 付长军, 季向阳). Chinese Journal of Computers (计算机学报), 2011, 34(3): 3425.
[15] Mallat S G, Zhang Z. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1993, 41(12): 3397.
[16] Tropp J A, Gilbert A C. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2007, 53(12): 4655.
[17] Chatterjee S, Sundman D, Skoglund M. International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, 2011.