|
|
|
|
|
|
| Spectral Detection Techniques and Field Applications for Typical
Atmospheric α-Dicarbonyl Compounds |
| CHEN Hao1, JIA Ye1, XU Jie1, DUAN Jun2, LIANG Shuai-xi3* |
1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
2. Key Laboratory of Environment Optics and Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
3. Department of Basic Courses, PLA Strategic Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450002，China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract Glyoxal and methylglyoxal are two typical types of α-dicarbonyl compounds in the atmospheric environment. The concentration variation is an important characterization of the oxidation process and reaction activity of atmospheric VOCs, which is of great significance for studying the oxidation reaction of the atmosphere. However, the characteristics of extremely low concentrations, short lifetime, and strong activity of glyoxal and methylglyoxal bring out certain challenges to accurately detecting their concentrations, resulting in limited monitoring results of the field environment and a lack of research on the mechanism of atmospheric chemical reactions. Several methods have been developed for detecting α-dicarbonyl compounds, such as chemical derivatization and mass spectrometry, which can effectively achieve gas concentration monitoring, but the technology also has certain limitations. In recent years, with the advancement of optical technology, a series of spectral methods has developed, such as Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy, Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy, Laser-Induced Phosphorescence, Fourier transform infrared, and other technologies, which have the characteristics of non-contact detection, low detection limit, high sensitivity, and high time resolution. This article summarizes the current status and development trends of spectral technology and provides a detailed explanation of the principle, key procedures, advantages, and disadvantages of the method. The article also lists the key features of the technology, such as device parameters, retrieval algorithm, detection limit, and relevant applications. At the same time, for the calibration requirements for the high activity α-dicarbonyl compounds, commonly used calibration methods, such as airflow dilution, temperature-controlled bubbler method, heating method, and atmospheric reaction method, were detailed and described and made a comparison. Finally, the field observation experiments of α-dicarbonyl compounds were summarized, including the experimental conditions, concentration results, and main conclusions, which indicated that spectral technology is a powerful tool for glyoxal and methylglyoxal detection. Some analysis of the correlation between concentration changes and primary pollution emissions, VOC oxidation, and secondary organic aerosol generation are carried out. The mixing ratio of formaldehyde, glyoxal, and methylglyoxal was mainly discussed, and the range of mixing ratio values under different environments was obtained. Some results indicate that RGF has lower values in BVOC environments, and a high mixing ratio may indicate the impact of artificial VOC sources.
|
|
Received: 2023-09-15
Accepted: 2024-03-06
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIANG Shuai-xi
E-mail: liangshuaixi@126.com
|
|
[1] Vereecken L, Glowacki D R, Pilling M J. Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115(10): 4063.
[2] Zellner R, John H Seinfeld，Spyros N. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2000, 37(2): 212.
[3] Li Q, Su G, Li C, et al. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 720: 137536.
[4] Fu T M, Jacob D J, Wittrock F, et al. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2008, 113: D15.
[5] Pang X, Lewis A C, Richard A, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2014, 7: 373.
[6] Liu J, Li X, Li D, et al. Atmospheric Environment, 2020, 238: 117727.
[7] Lv S, Gong D, Ding Y, et al. Science of The Total Environment, 2019, 672(1): 869.
[8] Li Q, Gong D, Wang H, et al. Science of The Total Environment, 2022, 824: 153782.
[9] Washenfelder R A, Young C J, Brown S S, et al. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2011, 116: D21.
[10] Qiu X, Wang S, Ying Q, et al. Environmental Science and Technology, 2020, 54(19): 11809.
[11] Liu J, Li X, Yang Y, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2019, 12(8): 4439.
[12] DiGangi J P, Henry S B, Kammrath A, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2012, 12(20): 9529.
[13] WANG Zhi-yu, LI Jian, YANG Hang, et al(王志宇, 李 剑, 杨 航, 等). Modern Chemical Research(当代化工研究), 2021，(1): 3.
[14] Thalman R, Volkamer R. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2010, 3(3): 2681.
[15] Naing N N, Lee H K. Journal of Chromatography A, 2018, 1573: 42.
[16] Michoud V, Stéphane Sauvage, Thierry Léonardis, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2018, 11(10): 5729.
[17] Stönner C, Derstroff B, Klüpfel T, et al. Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 2017, 52(1): 30.
[18] Lu X W, Jiang L X, Liu J, et al. Analytical Chemistry, 2019, 91(20)：12688.
[19] Li X, Brauers T, Hofzumahaus A, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 2012, 12(4): 3983.
[20] Liang S, Qin M, Xie P, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2019, 12(4): 2499.
[21] Huisman A J, Hottle J R, Coens K L, et al. Analytical Chemistry, 2008, 80(15): 5884.
[22] Henry S B, Kammrath A, Keutsch F N. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2011, 4(5): 181.
[23] Volkamer R, Molina L T, Molina M J, et al. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(8): L08806.
[24] Hoque H M S, Irie H, Damiani A. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmosphres, 2018, 123, 9957.
[25] Schreier S F, Richter A, Peters E, et al. Atmospheric Environment X, 2019, 5: 100059.
[26] PENG Fu-min, LUO Tao, YUAN Yu-peng, et al(彭夫敏, 罗 涛, 袁玉鹏, 等). Acta Photonica Sinica(光子学报), 2010, 39(10): 1889.
[27] Macdonald S M, Oetjen H, Mahajan A S, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2012, 12(13): 5949.
[28] Guo Y, Wang S, Zhu J, et al. Atmospheric Research, 2021, 258(2): 105635.
[29] Washenfelder R A, Langford A O, Fuchs H, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2008, 8(24): 7779.
[30] Min K E, Washenfelder R A, Dubé W P, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2016, 9(2): 423.
[31] Thalman R, Baeza-Romero M T, Ball S M, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2015, 8(4): 1835.
[32] Barbero A, Blouzon C, Savarino J, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2020，13(8): 4317.
[33] Fang B, Zhao W, Xu X, et al. Optics Express, 2017, 25(22): 26910.
[34] Hodas N, Sullivan A P, Skog K, et al. Environmental Science and Technology, 2014, 48(19): 11127.
[35] Walker H, Stone D, Ingham T, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2022, 22：5535.
[36] Profeta L T M, Sams R L, Johnson T J, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2011，115(35): 9886.
[37] Thalman R, Volkamer R. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2010, 3：1797.
[38] Wang D, Xie P, Hu R, et al. Atmosphere, 2022, 13：1268.
[39] Coburn S, Ortega I, Thalman R, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2014, 7：3579.
[40] Galloway M M, Chhabra P S, Chan A W H, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009, 9(10): 3331.
[41] Talukdar R K, Zhu L, Feierabend K J, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2011，11(21): 10837.
[42] Gen M, Huang D D, Chan C K. Environmental Science and Technology, 2018. 52(12): 6903.
[43] Trainic M, Abo Riziq A, Lavi A, et al. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2012. 116(24): 5948.
[44] Volkamer R, Baidar S, Campos T L, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2015, 8(5): 2121.
[45] Garcia A R, Volkamer R, Molina L T, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 2005, 6(12): 4545.
[46] Kaiser J, Wolfe G M, Min K E, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2015, 15(13): 7571.
[47] Li X, Rohrer F, Brauers T, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2014, 14(22): 12291.
[48] Wu Z, Zhang Y, Pei C, et al. Atmospheric Environment, 2021, 258：118491.
[49] Li Q, Gong D C, Wang H, et al. Science of The Total Environment, 2022, 824：153782.
|
| [1] |
SHEN Yong-cai1, NIU Yu-fan1, KONG De-feng2, YE Yang2*, ZHANG Shou-biao3, LI Da-chuang1, TAN Ming-sheng2, HUANG Yan-qing4, ZHAO Zhi-hao5, ZI Peng-fei3, ZHANG Xiao-hui5, WEN Fei3. Development and Performance Test of a Seya-Namioka Vacuum
Ultraviolet Spectroscopy System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(08): 2158-2165. |
| [2] |
ZHOU Chuang, ZHANG Qi-jin, LI Su-wen*, LUO Jing, MOU Fu-sheng*. Investigation of a Ground-Based MAX-DOAS System for Retrieving
Vertical Column Density of Atmospheric Water Vapor[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(08): 2395-2400. |
| [3] |
HU Chun-qiao1, 2, LUO Yu-han1*, SONG Run-ze1, 2, CHANG Zhen1, XI Liang1, ZHOU Hai-jin1, SI Fu-qi1. Study on Ground-Based Fast IDOAS for Monitoring the Distribution of Pollutants Discharged From Ship[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(06): 1537-1545. |
| [4] |
WANG Chen-yu1, 2, CHEN Cheng-cheng2, GAN Yu-xin1, 2, ZHANG Ping-ping1*, WANG Feng-xing1, 2, WANG Yue-xia4, LIU Chang-jin3, XIONG Yong2, JIANG Shen-hua1, 2*. The Inhibition Effect of Protocatechuic Acid on Low-Density Lipoprotein Oxidation and the Interaction Between This Acid With Bovine Serum
Albumin Based on Multi-Spectral Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(06): 1762-1772. |
| [5] |
QIAN Yuan-yuan1, 2, LUO Yu-han1, ZHOU Hai-jin1, DOU Ke1, CHANG Zhen1, YANG Tai-ping1, XI Liang1, TANG Fu-ying1, 2, XU Zi-qiang1, 2, SI Fu-qi1*. Research on Retrieval of Tropospheric Formaldehyde Profiles in Heshan Area From MAX-DOAS Measurements[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(06): 1781-1788. |
| [6] |
XU Qiu-yi1, 3, 4, ZHU Wen-yue3, 4, CHEN Jie2, 3, 4, LIU Qiang3, 4 *, ZHENG Jian-jie3, 4, YANG Tao2, 3, 4, YANG Teng-fei2, 3, 4. Calibration Method of Aerosol Absorption Coefficient Based on
Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 88-94. |
| [7] |
CHENG Jia-wei1, 2，LIU Xin-xing1, 2*，ZHANG Juan1, 2. Application of Infrared Spectroscopy in Exploration of Mineral Deposits: A Review[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 15-21. |
| [8] |
ZHENG Ni-na1, 2*, XIE Pin-hua1, QIN Min1, DUAN Jun1. Research on the Influence of Lamp Structure of the Combined LED Broadband Light Source on Differential Optical Absorption Spectrum
Retrieval and Its Removing Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3339-3346. |
| [9] |
HE Yan-ping, WANG Xin, LI Hao-yang, LI Dong, CHEN Jin-quan, XU Jian-hua*. Room Temperature Synthesis of Polychromatic Tunable Luminescent Carbon Dots and Its Application in Sensitive Detection of Hemoglobin[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3365-3371. |
| [10] |
KANG Ming-yue1, 3, WANG Cheng1, SUN Hong-yan3, LI Zuo-lin2, LUO Bin1*. Research on Internal Quality Detection Method of Cherry Tomatoes Based on Improved WOA-LSSVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3541-3550. |
| [11] |
GUO Ge1, 3, 4, ZHANG Meng-ling3, 4, GONG Zhi-jie3, 4, ZHANG Shi-zhuang3, 4, WANG Xiao-yu2, 5, 6*, ZHOU Zhong-hua1*, YANG Yu2, 5, 6, XIE Guang-hui3, 4. Construction of Biomass Ash Content Model Based on Near-Infrared
Spectroscopy and Complex Sample Set Partitioning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3143-3149. |
| [12] |
ZHANG Yue1, 3, ZHOU Jun-hui1, WANG Si-man1, WANG You-you1, ZHANG Yun-hao2, ZHAO Shuai2, LIU Shu-yang2*, YANG Jian1*. Identification of Xinhui Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium of Different Aging Years Based on Visible-Near Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3286-3292. |
| [13] |
ZHANG Jun-he, YU Hai-ye, DANG Jing-min*. Research on Inversion Model of Wheat Polysaccharide Under High Temperature and Ultraviolet Stress Based on Dual-Spectral Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2705-2709. |
| [14] |
YU Yang1, ZHANG Zhao-hui1, 2*, ZHAO Xiao-yan1, ZHANG Tian-yao1, LI Ying1, LI Xing-yue1, WU Xian-hao1. Effects of Concave Surface Morphology on the Terahertz Transmission Spectra[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2843-2848. |
| [15] |
LI Xin-xing1, 2, ZHANG Ying-gang1, MA Dian-kun1, TIAN Jian-jun3, ZHANG Bao-jun3, CHEN Jing4*. Review on the Application of Spectroscopy Technology in Food Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2333-2338. |
|
|
|
|
