连云港主要入海河流叶绿素a及综合营养状态指数遥感定量反演

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)10-3314-07

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2400 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Eutrophication of sea-going rivers seriously threatens the regional ecological environment and human safety as they transport pollutants from land-based sources to the sea. With the deep implementation of Xi Jinping's ideology of ecological civilization, the widespread application of management systems such as the “river chiefs” and the “bay chiefs”, as well as the comprehensive fight against pollution, the water quality of rivers and near-shore waters entering the sea has steadily improved. Despite this, water quality fluctuates, and pollution prevention remains vital. There is an urgent need to strengthen real-time and effective large-scale remote sensing monitoring to track and consolidate treatment effectiveness. Recently, as high-resolution satellite and UAV remote sensing technology has rapidly developed, a research hot topic in the field has been the application of quantitative remote sensing monitoring of water column components in river water bodies to promote further improvement of pollution prevention and control. In this paper, a quantitative remote sensing inversion study of chlorophyll a and trophic level index (TLI(Σ)) of the main seagoing rivers in Lianyungang was conducted utilizing field measurements of chlorophyll a, total phosphorus, and total nitrogen content in the Qiangwei River, Linhong River, Gubo Shanhou River, and Guan River during June 2022, as well as Sentinel-2A MSI L2A satellite images. A significant correlation was found between chlorophyll concentration, TLI(Σ), and visible band reflectance. In particular, this was evident in the three bands of 490, 560, and 665 wavelengths, which can be used as sensitive bands for modeling. Analysis showed that the correlation coefficients of R(λ) and Chl a were -0.697, -0.681 and -0.693, respectively, and the correlation coefficients of R(λ) and TLI(Σ) were -0.728, -0.744, and -0.706. The accuracy comparison of the inversion models revealed that the multiplicative power model with R(665) as the independent variable in logarithmic coordinates of chlorophyll concentration was the optimal model for its remote sensing quantitative inversion (R²=0.67, MAPE=47.34%, RMSE=12.89 μg·L^-1), while the multiplicative power model with R(560) as the independent variable model was the optimal model for the quantitative remote sensing inversion of TLI(Σ) (R²=0.61, MAPE=4.36%, RMSE=3.45). Using Sentinel-2A MSI L2A images acquired on 25 June 2022, models were applied to calculate the spatial distribution of chlorophyll concentration and TLI(Σ) of the main seagoing rivers in Lianyungang. As a result, the Qiangwei/Linghong River had the highest chlorophyll concentration and the highest TLI(Σ), followed by the Gubo Shanhou River and the Guan River, with the lowest. The inversion results were generally higher in the upper reaches of the rivers than in the lower reaches.

Key words：Chlorophyll a;Trophic level index;Remote sensing quantitative retrieval;Seagoing rivers;Lianyungang

Received: 2022-10-19 Accepted: 2023-05-06

ZTFLH:

X87

Corresponding Authors: WANG Xiang E-mail: xwang@nmemc.org.cn

Cite this article:

WANG Lin,WANG Xiang,ZHOU Chao, et al. Remote Sensing Quantitative Retrieval of Chlorophyll a and Trophic Level Index in Main Seagoing Rivers of Lianyungang[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3314-3320.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)10-3314-07 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2023/V43/I10/3314

[1] JIANG Xing-wei，HE Xian-qiang，LIN Ming-sen，et al（蒋兴伟，何贤强，林明森，等）. Haiyang Xuebao（海洋学报），2019，41(10)：113.
[2] WANG Qiao（王桥）. National Remote Sensing Bulletin（遥感学报），2021，25(1)：25.
[3] ZHANG Bing，LI Jun-sheng，SHEN Qian，et al（张兵，李俊生，申茜，等）. National Remote Sensing Bulletin（遥感学报），2021，25（1）：37.
[4] WANG Feng-xia，XIA Zhuo-yi , GUO Yu-hui, et al（王凤霞，夏卓异，郭雨辉，等）. China Environmental Science（中国环境科学），2022，42（2）：826.
[5] XU Peng-fei，MAO Feng，JIN Ping-bin, et al（徐鹏飞，毛峰，金平斌，等）. China Environmental Science（中国环境科学），2020，40(10)：4580.
[6] DUAN Hong-tao，CAO Zhi-gang，SHEN Ming，et al（段洪涛，曹志刚，沈明，等）. National Remote Sensing Bulletin（遥感学报），2022，26（1）：3.
[7] PENG Ling，MEI Jun-jun，WANG Na，et al（彭令，梅军军，王娜，等）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis（光谱学与光谱分析），2019，39（9）：2922.
[8] XIAO Xiao，XU Jian，ZHAO Deng-zhong，et al（肖潇，徐坚，赵登忠，等）. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute（长江科学院院报），2021，38(6)：128.
[9] WANG Hang-hang，WANG Jie，CUI Yu-huan（王行行，王杰，崔玉环）. Environmental Science（环境科学），2020，41(3)：1207.
[10] ZANG Chuan-kai，SHEN Fang，YANG Zheng-dong（臧传凯, 沈芳, 杨正东）. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources（自然资源遥感），2021，33(3)：45.
[11] XU Xin，ZHANG Yan-jun，DONG Wen-xun，et al（许昕，张艳军，董文逊，等）. China Rural Water and Hydropower（中国农村水利水电），2022，(6): 46.
[12] CAO Yin，YE Yun-tao，ZHAO Hong-li，et al（曹引，冶运涛，赵红莉，等）. Journal of Geo-information Science（地球信息科学学报），2022，24(3)：546.
[13] LIU Yao，LI Jun-sheng，XIAO Chen-chao，et al（刘瑶，李俊生，肖晨超，等）. National Remote Sensing Bulletin（遥感学报），2022，26（1）：168.
[14] Shi J，Shen Q，Yao Y，et al. Remote Sensing，2022，14：229.
[15] MA Chi（马驰）. Water Saving Irrigation（节水灌溉），2022，7：95.
[16] ZHANG Yong，ZHAN Yu，ZHU Chuan-hua，et al（张勇，詹宇，朱传华，等）. China Rural Water and Hydropower（中国农村水利水电），2021，(9)：28.
[17] CHEN Tian-yu，LIU Chang-qing，SHI Xiao-li，et al（陈天宇，刘常清，史小丽，等）. Environmental Science（环境科学），2022，43(7)：3523.
[18] WANG Jun-min，WANG Chen-bo，DONG Yuan-yuan，et al（王军敏，王晨波，董圆媛，等）. Environmental Monitoring and Forewarning（环境监控与预警），2021，13(2)：39.
[19] SHAO Xue-song，SONG Li，LIU Hao（邵雪松，宋力，刘浩）. Water Resources Development and Management（水资源开发与管理），2021，(4)：50.
[20] WANG Qiong，LU Cong，FAN Zhi-ping，et al（王琼，卢聪，范志平，等）. Journal of Lake Sciences（湖泊科学），2017，29（2）：297.