纳米氧化锌对细叶蜈蚣草(<em>Egeria najas</em>)光合作用的影响

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2019)05-1495-08

Abstract
References
Related Citation (8)

Download: PDF (4137 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In this study, we selected Egeria najas as the sample plant, which was exposed to different concentrations of Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) suspensions for six days. The effects of different concentrations of ZnO NPs on photosynthetic processes of Egeria najas were explored respectively, by analyzing the O-J-I-P fluorescence induction dynamics curve and the pulse transient fluorescence induction dynamics curve. ZnO NPs strengthened the connectivity between photosystem Ⅱ (PSⅡ) units, promoted the efficiency of the electron transport at the acceptor side of PSⅡ and the utilization of the absorbed light energy, indicated by the significant decrease (p<0.05) in the net rate of PSⅡ closure （M₀）, the relative variable fluorescence intensity at phase J （V_J） and the effective dissipation of an active RC（DI₀/RC）, and the significant increase (p<0.05) in the maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry （Φ_P0）, the efficiency with which a trapped exciton can move an electron into the electron transport chain further than Q^-_A（Ψ₀）, the quantum yield of electron transport （Φ_E0） and the effective quantum yield of electron transport at PSⅡ （ $\100dpi \inline \phi$ ′_PSⅡ） after exposure to ZnO NPs suspensions. These results suggested that ZnO NPs improved the photosynthetic performance to some degree. Corresponding concentrations of Zn²⁺ solution was also used to cultivate Egeria najas. Zn²⁺ lowered the connectivity between PSⅡ units, inhibited the electron transport at the acceptor side of PSⅡ and the utilization of absorbed light energy and damaged the PSⅡ reaction centers, as indicated by the significant increase (p<0.05) in the net rate of PSⅡ closure, the relative variable fluorescence intensity at phase J, the effective dissipation of an active RC, the effective antenna size of an active RC （ABS/RC）, the energy trapping capacity per active PSⅡ RC (TR₀/RC), and the quantum yield of dissipation through fluorescence and basal thermal processes （ $\100dpi \inline \phi$ ′_NO） and the significant decrease (p<0.05) in the maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry （Φ_P0）, the efficiency with which a trapped exciton can move an electron into the electron transport chain further than Ｑ^-_A（Ψ₀）, the quantum yield of electron transport （Φ_E0） and the effective quantum yield of electron transport at PSⅡ （ $\100dpi \inline \phi$ ′_PSⅡ） after exposure to Zn²⁺ solution. These results suggested that Zn²⁺ inhibited photosynthetic processes of Egeria najas. When the sample plant was exposed to ZnO NPs suspensions, the effect of the Zn²⁺ released from ZnO NPs suspensions on the sample plant was not obvious, which meant that the enhancement was stronger than the inhibition.

Key words：Zinc oxide nanoparticle; Egeria najas; Chlorophyll a fluorescence; Photosystem Ⅱ

Received: 2018-03-24 Accepted: 2018-08-10

ZTFLH:

Q945.1

Corresponding Authors: XU Chang-shan E-mail: csxu@nenu.edu.cn

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2019)05-1495-08 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2019/V39/I05/1495

[1] Serpone Nick, Dondi Daniele, Albini Angelo. Inorganica Chimica Acta, 2007, 360(3): 794.
[2] Nohynek G J, Lademann J, Roberts M S. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2007, 37(3): 251.
[3] Klingshirn C. Physica Status Solidi B-Basic Solid State Physics, 2007, 244(9): 3027.
[4] Moezzi Amir, McDonagh A M, Cortie M B. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 185-186: 1.
[5] Piccinno F, Gottschalk F, Seeger S, et al. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2012, 14(9): 1109.
[6] Reddy K M, Feris Kevin, Bell Jason, et al. Applied Physics Letters, 2007, 90: 2139021.
[7] Lin D H, Xing B S. Environmental Pollution, 2007, 150(2): 243.
[8] Bai W, Zhang Z Y, Tian W J, et al. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2010, 12(5): 1645.
[9] ZHAO Gui-qi, ZHOU Yan, YIN Ying, et al(赵桂琦, 周燕, 尹颖, 等). Journal of Nanjing University(南京大学学报·自然科学), 2017, 53(5): 894.
[10] Chen X, O’Halloran J, Jansen M A. Aquatic Toxicology, 2016, 174: 46.
[11] LIU Lei-zhen, WU Jian-jun，ZHOU Hong-kui, et al(刘雷震, 武建军, 周洪奎, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2017, 37(9): 2780.
[12] Fratamico A, Tocquin P, Franck F. Photosynthesis Research, 2016, 128(3): 271.
[13] Perreault F, Samadani M, Dewez D. Nanotoxicology, 2014, 8(4): 374.
[14] Antal T K, Matorin D N, Ilyash L V, et al. Photosynthesis Research, 2009, 102(1): 67.
[15] Franklin N M, Rogers N J, Apte S C, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(24): 8484.
[16] LI Peng-min，GAO Hui-yuan(李鹏民，高辉远). Journal of Plant Physiology and Melecular Biology(植物生理与分子生物学学报), 2005, 31(60): 559.
[17] XIA Jian-rong, TIAN Qi-ran(夏建荣，田启然). Journal of Environmental Sciences(环境科学学报英文版), 2009, 21(11): 1569.
[18] Lin D, Xing B. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(15): 5580.
[19] Hou J, Wu Y Z, Li X, et al. Chemosphere, 2018，193: 852.
[20] Shaymurat T, Gu J X, Xu C S, et al. Nanotoxicology, 2012, 6(3): 241.