江西朱溪钨矿床矽卡岩矿物热红外光谱学特征研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)01-0070-08

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (3595 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The mineralization of scheelite in the Zhuxi tungsten deposits is closely related to skarnization. Scheelite is mostly produced together with skarn minerals such as garnet and diopside. In this study, for the first time, the typical skarn minerals such as garnet, diopside, vesuvianite, wollastonite and actinolite are measured by micro infrared spectroscopy and electron probe analysis to explore the thermal infrared spectral characteristics of skarn minerals in Zhuxi and their implications for mineralization, and to establish a thermal infrared spectral library of skarn minerals in Zhuxi area. The results show that the garnet in Zhuxi tungsten deposit is mainly grossular-and radite series. There are two absorption peaks (a large and a small) near 800 and 920 cm^-1, and there is a characteristic absorption valley near 880 cm^-1. When the grossular content in garnet is greater than 50%, the characteristic absorption valley of garnet is located at 880~900 cm^-1. When grossular content is less than 50%, the absorption valley of garnet is located at 865~875 cm^-1. With the increase of Al₂O₃ content in garnet, the characteristic absorption valley moves towards the high-wavenumber direction. Grossular tends to high wavenumber while andradite tends to low wavenumber; Diopside is mainly diopside-hedenbergite series. There is a diagnostic step-shaped absorption peak in the wavenumber range of 850~950 cm^-1, anabsorption peak at 1 050 cm^-1 and a weak double-valley absorption at 1 000 cm^-1. With the decrease of diopside content, MgO content decreases the diopside absorption peak moves to the low-wavenumber direction. The absorption peak of hedenbergite is concentrated in the low-wavenumber range compared with diopside, which is consistent with the changing law of garnet. It is speculated that the reason is that Al and Mg are more active than Fe. Vesuvianite has similar absorption peaks in the range of 850~950 cm^-1 as diopside. The difference is that vesuvianite still has anabsorption peak at 800 cm^-1; Wollastonite has three absorption peaks (a large and two small) near 875, 1 000 and 1 060 cm^-1, and two characteristic absorption valleys near 980 and 1 040 cm^-1; Actinolite has two absorption peaks (a small and a large) near 750 and 900 cm^-1, and three characteristic absorption valleys near 770, 930 and 1 020 cm^-1.The scheelite mineralization in the Zhuxi deposit is most closely related to garnet and diopside, and it mainly grows in veins along the boundary of garnet and diopside. Their thermal infrared spectra can be used as an indicator for searching for scheelite. The above results have theoretical and practical significance for in-depth analysis and research on the mineralogy characteristics and genetic environment of the Zhuxi tungsten deposit in Jiangxi, as well as for exploring the possibility of using thermal infrared technology to guide skarn mineral zoning and ore prospecting.

Key words：Thermal infrared spectroscopy; Mineralogy; Skarn; Zhuxi

Received: 2021-11-23 Accepted: 2022-04-11

ZTFLH:

O433.4

Corresponding Authors: DAI Jing-jing E-mail: daijingjing863@sina.com

Cite this article:

FU Ming-hai,DAI Jing-jing,WANG Xian-guang, et al. A Study on the Thermal Infrared Spectroscopy Characteristics of the Skarn Minerals in Zhuxi Tungsten Deposit, Jiangxi Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 70-77.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)01-0070-08 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2023/V43/I01/70

[1] MAO Jing-wen, WU Sheng-hua, SONG Shi-wei, et al(毛景文, 吴胜华, 宋世伟, 等). Chinese Science Bulletin (科学通报), 2020, 65(33): 3746.
[2] ZHOU Xian-rong, CHEN Qi, OUYANG Yong-peng, et al(周显荣, 陈祺, 欧阳永棚, 等). Journal of Hefei University of Technology·Natural Science(合肥工业大学学报·自然科学版), 2019, 42(3): 289.
[3] OUYANG Yong-peng, MAO Jing-wen, XIE Gui-qing, et al(欧阳永棚, 毛景文, 谢桂青, 等). Mineral Deposits(矿床地质), 2018, 37(5): 940.
[4] Ouyang Yongpeng, Wei Jing, Lu Ge, et al. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(12): 3488.
[5] LIU Min, SONG Shi-wei, CUI Yu-rong, et al(刘敏, 宋世伟, 崔玉荣, 等). Acta Petrologica Sinica(岩石学报), 2021, 37(3): 717.
[6] LI Yan, PAN Xiao-fei, OUYANG Yong-peng, et al(李岩, 潘小菲, 欧阳永棚, 等). Geology and Exploration(地质与勘探), 2020, 56(2): 315.
[7] ZHAO Miao, PAN Xiao-fei, LI Yan, et al(赵苗, 潘小菲, 李岩, 等). Geological Bulletin of China(地质通报), 2015, 34(Z1): 548.
[8] SHU Li-min, ZHONG Shi-jun, HE Ling(舒立旻, 钟仕俊, 贺玲). Journal of East China University of Technology·Natural Science(东华理工大学学报·自然科学版), 2017, 40(2): 140.
[9] OUYANG Yong-peng, ZHOU Xian-rong, YAO Zai-yu, et al(欧阳永棚, 周显荣, 尧在雨, 等). Earth Science Frontiers(地学前缘), 2020, 27(4): 219.
[10] LIAN Dun-mei, GUO Na, HU Zheng-hua, et al(连敦梅, 郭娜, 胡正华, 等). China Tungsten Industry(中国钨业), 2020, 35(5): 20.
[11] DAI Jing-jing, ZHAO Long-xian, JIANG Qi, et al(代晶晶, 赵龙贤, 姜琪, 等). Acta Geologica Sinica(地质学报), 2020, 94(8): 2520.
[12] DAI Jing-jing, ZHAO Long-xian, WANG Hai-yu(代晶晶, 赵龙贤, 王海宇). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(6): 1764.
[13] Hofmeister A M, Chopelas A. Phys. Chem. Miner., 1991, 17(6): 503.
[14] WU Fei, ZHANG Xiao-chao, ZHU Zhong-liang(吴菲, 张晓超, 朱仲良). The Journal of Light Scattering(光散射学报), 2015, 27(4): 350.
[15] Lawrence D Meinert. Geoscience Canada，1992, 19(4): 145.
[16] ZHAO Yi-ming, ZHANG Yi-nan, LIN Wen-wei(赵一鸣, 张轶男, 林文蔚). Mineral Deposits(矿床地质), 1997，(4): 31.