|
|
|
|
|
|
Multispectral Analysis of Interaction Between Catechins and Egg Yolk Immunoglobulin and the Change of Bacteriostasis |
ZHANG Meng-jun1, LIU Li-li1*, YANG Xie-li2, GUO Jing-fang1, WANG Hao-yang1 |
1. College of Food and Bioengineering, National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Food Processing and Security, Food Microbiology Engineering Technology Research Center of Henan Province, Research and Utilization of Functional Food Resources Science and Technology Innovation Team of Henan Provincial Department of Education, Luoyang 471023, China
2. LIZHENG College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China
|
|
|
Abstract As a Cenozoic antibody, chicken egg yolk immunoglobulin (IgY) has the characteristics of safety, stability and no drug residue. It has an inhibitory effect on a variety of pathogenic microorganisms. IgY is one of the ideal substitutes for antibiotics. However, it cannot be used on an extensive scale application to a certain extent because of its high production cost and low antibacterial activity caused by protease decomposition. Therefore, it is of great significance to improve its economic benefit and bioavailability using modification. In this study, catechin interacted with IgY to prepare its complex. It provides support for improving the antibacterial properties of IgY and preparing safer and more efficient antibacterial agents. The interaction mechanism between catechin and IgY was studied via UV-Vis, FS and FT-IR. The antibacterial properties of the IgY-catechin complex were studied by using IgY and a mixture of IgY and catechin as control. With the increase of catechin concentration, the UV-Vis absorption peak value of IgY gradually increased and showed a blue shift. The quenching type of IgY by catechins is mainly static quenching. The IgY and catechin combine to form a complex with a number of binding sites close to 1. The interaction types were van der Waals force and hydrogen bond. Compared with IgY, the content of β-folded and β-corner in the secondary structure of the IgY-catechin complex had no significant change, while the content of α-helix was increased and irregular convolution was decreased. It indicated that the conformation of protein was changed due to the introduction of catechin. Compared with IgY and a mixture of IgY and catechin, the antibacterial rate of IgY-catechin complex against Staphylococcus aureus was increased by 135.8% and 9.95% on average, respectively. When the concentration was greater than 0.05 mg·mL-1, the antibacterial rate against Escherichia coli was increased by 15.74% and 13.27%, respectively. Catechins and IgY could form a complex, which showed better antibacterial properties than IgY and mixture of IgY and catechin. This study is helpful in understanding the effects of catechins on the structure and function of IgY. It can also provide theoretical support for preparing safer and more efficient antibiotic substitutes. In addition, this study can supply theoretical guidance for the property changes of IgY during food processing.
|
Received: 2021-06-13
Accepted: 2021-08-19
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIU Li-li
E-mail: yangliuyilang@126.com
|
|
[1] Hu B C, Yang X D, Guo E P, et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2019, 99(5): 2565.
[2] Abbas A T, El-Kafrawy S A, Sohrab S S, et al. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 2019, 15(1): 264.
[3] Karamzadeh D A, Towhidia1 A, Zhandia M, et al. Animal,2020, 15(2): 100124.
[4] HE Wei-chao, ZHANG Hui-yan, WANG Hao, et a1(贺维朝, 张会艳, 王 浩, 等). China Animal Husbandry &Veterinary Medicine(中国畜牧兽医), 2021, 48(2): 640.
[5] Redwan E M, Aljadawi A A, Uversky V N. Poultry Science, 2020, 100(3): 100956.
[6] YAO Qi-feng, WU Zheng-qi, CHEN Xiao-qiang, et al(姚其凤, 吴正奇, 陈小强, 等). Science and Technology of Food Industry(食品工业科技), 2019, 40(8): 337.
[7] Jia J J, Gao X, Hao M H, et al. Food Chemistry, 2017, 228: 143.
[8] Jia Z B, Zheng M, Tao F, et al. LWT—Food Science and Technology, 2016, 66: 305.
[9] ZHOU Xu-xia, CHEN Ting, LÜ Fei, et al(周绪霞, 陈 婷, 吕 飞, 等). Food Science(食品科学), 2018, 39(16): 13.
[10] ZHANG Chuan-ying, PENG Xin, RAO Heng-jun, et al(张传英, 彭 鑫, 饶恒军, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(6): 1701.
[11] NIU Meng-xian, SUI Jian-xin, LIN Hong, et al(牛梦宪, 隋建新, 林 洪, 等). Food Science and Technology(食品科技), 2018, 43(7): 203.
[12] ZHANG Man, LIU Xi, CONG Ri-hua, et al(张 曼, 柳 溪, 丛日华). Joumal of Tianjin Agricultural University(天津农学院学报), 2020, 27(2): 56.
[13] LI Qing-shu, CHENG Lin, DENG Hong, et a1(李庆舒, 程 琳, 邓 红, 等). Food and Fermentation Industries(食品与发酵工业), 2020, 46(3): 180.
[14] JIANG Ming(蒋 鸣). China Condiment(中国调味品), 2021, 46(1): 63.
[15] NI Xiao-xia, YE Cai-fa, SHEN Qiu-lian, et a1(倪晓霞, 叶财发, 沈秋莲, 等). Guiding Journal of TCM(中医药导报), 2020, 26(15): 25.
[16] ZHU Ying, WANG Zhong-jiang, LI Yang, et al(朱 颖, 王中江, 李 杨,等). Transactions of The Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2018, 49(6): 368.
[17] CHEN Shuang, WANG Xiao-dan, LI Rui, et a1(陈 爽, 王小丹, 李 瑞, 等). Food Science(食品科学), 2019, 40(23): 8.
[18] WEN Peng-cheng, JIAO Yao-yao, ZHANG Wei-bing, et al(文鹏程, 焦瑶瑶, 张卫兵, 等). Food and Fermentation Industries(食品与发酵工业), 2020, 46(8): 40.
[19] WANG Chen, XIE Yan-li, FAN Ting-ting(王 晨, 谢岩黎, 范亭亭). Food Science(食品科学), 2019, 40(20): 60.
[20] LIU Jian-lei, XING Xiao-juan, ZHOU Rui, et al(刘建垒, 邢效娟, 周 瑞, 等). Food Science(食品科学), 2017, 38(5): 7.
[21] LIU Qin-qin, ZHU Ke-xue, GUO Xiao-na, et al(刘勤勤, 朱科学, 郭晓娜, 等). Food Science(食品科学), 2015, 36(17): 43.
[22] Zhang Q, Lin H, Sui J X, et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2015, 95(1): 136.
|
[1] |
FAN Ping-ping,LI Xue-ying,QIU Hui-min,HOU Guang-li,LIU Yan*. Spectral Analysis of Organic Carbon in Sediments of the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea by Different Spectrometers[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 52-55. |
[2] |
YANG Chao-pu1, 2, FANG Wen-qing3*, WU Qing-feng3, LI Chun1, LI Xiao-long1. Study on Changes of Blue Light Hazard and Circadian Effect of AMOLED With Age Based on Spectral Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 36-43. |
[3] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[4] |
LI Qi-chen1, 2, LI Min-zan1, 2*, YANG Wei2, 3, SUN Hong2, 3, ZHANG Yao1, 3. Quantitative Analysis of Water-Soluble Phosphorous Based on Raman
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3871-3876. |
[5] |
LIANG Jin-xing1, 2, 3, XIN Lei1, CHENG Jing-yao1, ZHOU Jing1, LUO Hang1, 3*. Adaptive Weighted Spectral Reconstruction Method Against
Exposure Variation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3330-3338. |
[6] |
GUO Jing-fang, LIU Li-li*, CHENG Wei-wei, XU Bao-cheng, ZHANG Xiao-dan, YU Ying. Effect of Interaction Between Catechin and Glycosylated Porcine
Hemoglobin on Its Structural and Functional Properties[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3615-3621. |
[7] |
ZHANG Xiao-dan1, 2, LIU Li-li1*, YU Ying1, CHENG Wei-wei1, XU Bao-cheng1, HE Jia-liang1, CHEN Shu-xing1, 2. Activation of Epigallocatechin Gallate on Alcohol Dehydrogenase:
Multispectroscopy and Molecular Docking Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3622-3628. |
[8] |
MA Qian1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Research on Classification of Heavy Metal Pb in Honeysuckle Based on XRF and Transfer Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2729-2733. |
[9] |
HUANG Chao1, 2, ZHAO Yu-hong1, ZHANG Hong-ming2*, LÜ Bo2, 3, YIN Xiang-hui1, SHEN Yong-cai4, 5, FU Jia2, LI Jian-kang2, 6. Development and Test of On-Line Spectroscopic System Based on Thermostatic Control Using STM32 Single-Chip Microcomputer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2734-2739. |
[10] |
YANG Jing1, LI Li1, LIANG Jian-dan1, HUANG Shan1, SU Wei1, WEI Ya-shu2, WEI Liang1*, XIAO Qi1*. Study on the Interaction Mechanism Between Thiosemicarbazide Aryl Ruthenium Complexes and Human Serum Albumin[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2761-2767. |
[11] |
ZHENG Yi-xuan1, PAN Xiao-xuan2, GUO Hong1*, CHEN Kun-long1, LUO Ao-te-gen3. Application of Spectroscopic Techniques in Investigation of the Mural in Lam Rim Hall of Wudang Lamasery, China[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2849-2854. |
[12] |
WANG Jun-jie1, YUAN Xi-ping2, 3, GAN Shu1, 2*, HU Lin1, ZHAO Hai-long1. Hyperspectral Identification Method of Typical Sedimentary Rocks in Lufeng Dinosaur Valley[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2855-2861. |
[13] |
WANG Jing-yong1, XIE Sa-sa2, 3, GAI Jing-yao1*, WANG Zi-ting2, 3*. Hyperspectral Prediction Model of Chlorophyll Content in Sugarcane Leaves Under Stress of Mosaic[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2885-2893. |
[14] |
ZHANG Ye-li1, 2, CHENG Jian-wei3, DONG Xiao-ting2, BIAN Liu-jiao2*. Structural Insight Into Interaction Between Imipenem and Metal β-Lactamase SMB-1 by Spectroscopic Analysis and Molecular Docking[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2287-2293. |
[15] |
WANG Yu-qi, LI Bin, ZHU Ming-wang, LIU Yan-de*. Optimizations of Sample and Wavelength for Apple Brix Prediction Model Based on LASSOLars Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1419-1425. |
|
|
|
|