|
|
|
|
|
|
A Method for Detecting Sucrose in Living Sugarcane With Visible-NIR Transmittance Spectroscopy |
LÜ Xue-gang1, 2,LI Xiu-hua1, 2*,ZHANG Shi-min2,ZHANG Mu-qing1, JIANG Hong-tao1 |
1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
2. School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China |
|
|
Abstract Sucrose content is an important indicator to measure the quality of sugarcane. It is of great significance to study the non-destructive detection method of sucrose content in living sugarcane based on the principle of spectroscopy. Sugarcane has a cylindrical shape with a hard skin and waxy surface. Different spectra detection angles and surface conditions will affect the modeling results to a certain extent. In addition, dimension reduction of characteristic wavelengths extraction is another factor that affects the model’s accuracy. In this study, the effect of different spectral measurement styles on the accuracy of the sucrose content prediction model was evaluated, an improved method for characteristic wavelengths extraction was proposed, and a sucrose prediction model was eventually constructed. A spectra acquisition platform was designed to obtain the transmittance spectra of sugarcane stalks. When acquiring the transmittance spectra, there were three different acquisition angles (120°, 150° and 180°) between the incident light and the measurement probe and two surface conditions (wax-not-removed and wax-removed).Six data sets of 123 samples were obtained in total. Firstly, PLS modeling result was used to evaluate the effect of different spectral pretreatment methods, including S-G smoothing, standard normal variation (SNV), multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), first derivation (FD), etc., and the result showed that SNV had the best comprehensive performance and was selected for further study.Then the effect of different measurement styles on the modeling of sucrose content was evaluated.The result found that: (1) regarding the effect of wax coverage,the spectral transmittance after wax-removed was high, the spectral difference among different collection sites of a single sample was lower, and the correlation with sucrose was much higher; (2) regarding the effect of the spectra acquisition angle, the transmittance decreased as the angle increased in a certain range; (3) the best modeling result was obtained (Rp=0.790 6, RMSEP=0.898 6) with the measurement style of wax-removed and 120° measurement angle. Finally, the interval partial least squares method (i-PLS), genetic algorithm (GA), ant colony algorithm (ACO) and an improved ant colony algorithm (VRC-ACO) based on full wavelengths PLS modeling variable regression coefficient proposed in this study were used to extract the characteristic wavelengths. The result showed that the number of characteristic wavelengths selected by the VRC-ACO algorithm, which had only ten wavelengths,was the least, yet the prediction accuracy was the best (Rp=0.861 6, 9.0% higher than the full-band model; RMSEP=0.746 6, 20.0% lower than the full-band model). This research provides theoretical support for the non-destructive detection of sugarcane and the development of corresponding sensors.
|
Received: 2021-06-07
Accepted: 2021-09-25
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Xiu-hua
E-mail: lixh@gxu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] LI Xuan, GAN Ning-jun, WEN Tao, et al(李 暄,干宁军,温 韬,等). Applied Chemical Industry(应用化工), 2017, 46(10): 2023.
[2] Assis C, Ramos R S, Silva L A, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2017, 71(8): 2001.
[3] Gersdorff G J E V, Kirchner S M, Hensel O, et al. Meat Science, 2021, 178(4): 108525.
[4] Minaei S, Shafiee S, Polder G, et al. Infrared Physics and Technology, 2017, 86: 218.
[5] Liang P S, Haff R P, Hua S, et al. Biosystems Engineering, 2018, 166: 161.
[6] Kamboj U, Guha P, Mishra S. Analytical Letters, 2017, 50(11): 1754.
[7] Martínez-Arias R, Müller B U, Schechert A. Sugar Tech, 2017, 19(5): 526.
[8] Li M, Han D, Liu W. Biosystems Engineering, 2019, 188: 31.
[9] Xu S, Lu H, Ference C, et al. Biosensors, 2020, 10(4): 41.
[10] Taira E, Ueno M, Saengprachatanarug K, et al. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 2013, 21(4): 281.
[11] SteidleNeto A J, Lopes D C, Toledo J V, et al. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2018, 156(4): 537.
[12] LU Wan-zhen(陆婉珍). Modern Near Infrared Spectroscopy Analytical Technology(现代近红外光谱分析技术). Beijing: China Petrochemical Press(北京:中国石化出版社), 2006. 30.
[13] HUANG Li-xian, LI Da-peng, WU Fan, et al(黄立贤,李大鹏,吴 凡,等). High Power Laser and Particle Beams(强激光与粒子束), 2018, 30(1): 186. |
[1] |
LI Wei1, TAN Feng2*, ZHANG Wei1, GAO Lu-si3, LI Jin-shan4. Application of Improved Random Frog Algorithm in Fast Identification of Soybean Varieties[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3763-3769. |
[2] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[3] |
YANG Chun-mei1, ZHU Zan-bin1, 2*, LI Yu-cheng1, MA Yan1, SONG Hai-yang3. Bark Content Determination of Ultra-Thin Fibreboard by
Hyperspectral Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3266-3271. |
[4] |
WEI Zi-kai, WANG Jie, ZHANG Ruo-yu, ZHANG Meng-yun*. Classification of Foreign Matter in Cotton Using Line Scan Hyperspectral Transmittance Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3230-3238. |
[5] |
KONG De-ming1, LIU Ya-ru1, DU Ya-xin2, CUI Yao-yao2. Oil Film Thickness Detection Based on IRF-IVSO Wavelength Optimization Combined With LIF Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2811-2817. |
[6] |
WANG Jun-jie1, YUAN Xi-ping2, 3, GAN Shu1, 2*, HU Lin1, ZHAO Hai-long1. Hyperspectral Identification Method of Typical Sedimentary Rocks in Lufeng Dinosaur Valley[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2855-2861. |
[7] |
WANG Jing-yong1, XIE Sa-sa2, 3, GAI Jing-yao1*, WANG Zi-ting2, 3*. Hyperspectral Prediction Model of Chlorophyll Content in Sugarcane Leaves Under Stress of Mosaic[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2885-2893. |
[8] |
TANG Ruo-han1, 2, LI Xiu-hua1, 2*, LÜ Xue-gang1, 2, ZHANG Mu-qing2, 3, YAO Wei2, 3. Transmittance Vis-NIR Spectroscopy for Detecting Fibre Content of
Living Sugarcane[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2419-2425. |
[9] |
YAO Kun-shan1, SUN Jun1*, CHEN Chen2, XU Min1, CHENG Jie-hong1, ZHOU Xin1. Non-Destructive Identification for Panax Notoginseng Powder of Different Parts Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2027-2031. |
[10] |
LIN Jing-tao, XIN Chen-xing, LI Yan*. Spectral Characteristics of “Trapiche-Like Sapphire” From ChangLe, Shandong Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1199-1204. |
[11] |
LI Quan-lun1, CHEN Zheng-guang1*, JIAO Feng2. Prediction of Oil Content in Oil Shale by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on Stacking Ensemble Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1030-1036. |
[12] |
LIU Xin-yu1, SHAO Wen-wu2*, ZHOU Shi-rui3. Spectral Pattern Recognition of Cardiac Tissue in Electric Shock Death and Post-Mortem Electric Shock[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1126-1133. |
[13] |
JIA Meng-meng, YIN Yong*, YU Hui-chun, YUAN Yun-xia, WANG Zhi-hao. Hyperspectral Imaging Combined With Feature Wavelength Screening for Monitoring the Quality Change of Tomato During Storage[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 969-975. |
[14] |
ZHAO Ting-ting1, 3, WANG Ke-jian1, 3*, SI Yong-sheng1, 3, SHU Ying2, HE Zhen-xue1, 3, WANG Chao1, 3, ZHANG Zhi-sheng2*. Freshness Detection of Lamb Based on AW-OPS Hyperspectral
Wavelength Selection Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 830-837. |
[15] |
LIU Ge1, CHEN Bin2*, SHANG Zhi-xuan2, QUAN Yu-xuan2. Near Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis of Moisture in Engine Oil[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 449-454. |
|
|
|
|