|
|
|
|
|
|
Phase Characterizing and Processing in Fourier Transform Spectroscopy |
LIU Jia-qing1, 2, LI Zhi-zeng1, 4, LI Jing3*, LIU Lei1, 4, LIU Lei1, GUO Hong-long1, WANG Jian-guo1 |
1. China Electronics Technology Instruments Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266555, China
2. Science and Technology on Electronic Test & Measurement Laboratory, Qingdao 266555, China
3. College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
4. The 41st Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, Qingdao 266555, China |
|
|
Abstract Phase correction is a critical procedure for Fourier transform spectrometers(FTS), whose accuracy can be jeopardized from instrument properties and many uncontrollable environmental conditions, such as significant temperature change of interferometer, mechanical disturbances. Nevertheless, a generally applicable phase correction method seems not available, since current research result in limitations of the standard methods and propose solutions tailored to specific instruments. Considering of phase uncertainly and the challenge of phase determination, the phase property of FTS is characterization and analysis,then to resolve the FTS phase into an instrumental phase that is dependent on the interferometer temperature and a linear phase component that accounts for the discrepancy between the actual interferogram zero optical path difference (ZOPD) and the sampled one. The instrumental phase is mostly an instrumental characteristic that can be identified along with the other calibration parameters, the instrumental phase is strongly affected by interferometer temperature fluctuation, the instrumental phase is constant with interferometer temperature changes within threshold; While linear phase is main attributable to the offset between the digitized ZOPD and the real ZOPD, but also a mainly component of FTS phase. According to the principle of FTS, ZOPD sample errors can change abruptly from one interferogram to another; as a result, each spectrum has a different linear phase with respect to the wavenumber. So the phase processing can be simplification as a linear phase correction, residual phase, including the instrumental phase was removed in radiometric calibration later. This work considers the temperature properties of instrument phase, the implemented method is based on the identification of linear phase by least-squares approach, with interferogram symmetrization, residuals phase of measured data is stabilization to permit spectra averaging, so the artifacts due to vibrations are removed, the last step is complex radiometric calibration procedure with mostly instrumental phase removed, and then the phase correction is accomplished. Based on experimental data, the linear phase terms are derived by the leasts-quares method and removed. Data were interpolated to model the instrumental phase using different order polynomials. A fifth-order polynomial fitting was eventually used with mean square errors(MSE) of 0.13 rad, because of a further reduction of MSE is not entail with the order increased. Instrumental phase with interferometer temperatures of 283, 290 and 300 K were taken by fifth-order polynomial fitting. Phase regression residuals with the instrumental phase and linear phase removed, stochastic distributed central at zero, the temperature dependence of the instrumental phase by theoretic is demonstrated by experiment. And then, the feasibility of the proposal phase processing method is experimentally validated. Experimental result shows that phase residuals within ±0.04 rad and the radiometric uncertainty sought 0.8 K accuracy or better is achieved.
|
Received: 2019-11-11
Accepted: 2020-03-18
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Jing
E-mail: lijing2014@sdust.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Hearn D R. Massachusetts Inst of Tech Lexington Lincoln Lab, 1999, 5.
[2] Mertz L. Josa, 1964, 54(12): 9.
[3] Anne K, Olaf T. Appl. Opt., 2007, 46(12): 2307.
[4] Simon T, Tracy S. Appl. Opt., 2010, 49(17): 3411.
[5] Kim R, Wigand H. Appl. Opt., 1997, 36(26): 6678.
[6] Kozlov D. J. Optical Technology, 2013, 80(2): 110.
[7] Snively C, Koenig J. Applied Spectroscopy, 1999, 53(2): 170.
[8] Bruno C, Luca P, Piera R. Appl. Opt., 1999, 38(36): 7475.
[9] Johnson D,Traub W, Jucks K. Appl. Opt., 1996, 35(16): 2955.
[10] Vallon F, Maucher G, Kleinert A, et al. Appl. Opt., 2004, 43(16): 3335.
[11] Olaf T, Christian W. Appl. Opt., 2000, 39(31): 5834.
[12] Bortolino S, Diego S, Marco T. Appl. Opt., 2011, 50(12): 1717.
[13] Saggin B, Comolli L, Formisano V. Appl. Opt., 2007, 46(22): 5248.
[14] Revercomb H, Buijs H, Howell H, et al. Appl. Opt., 1988, 27(15): 3210.
[15] Formisano V, Angrilli F, Arnold G, et al. Planetary and Space Science, 2005, 53(10): 963. |
[1] |
GUO Wei1, CHANG Hao2*, XU Can3, ZHOU Wei-jing2, YU Cheng-hao1, JI Gang2. Effect of Continuous Laser Irradiation on Scattering Spectrum
Characteristics of GaAs Cells[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3674-3681. |
[2] |
TIAN Fu-chao1, CHEN Lei2*, PEI Huan2, BAI Jie-qi1, ZENG Wen2. Study of Factors Influencing the Length of Argon Plasma Jets at
Atmospheric Pressure With Needle Ring Electrodes[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3682-3689. |
[3] |
BAI Bing1, 2, 3, CHEN Guo-zhu2, 3, YANG Wen-bin2, 3, CHE Qing-feng2, 3, WANG Lin-sen2, 3, SUN Wei-min1*, CHEN Shuang1, 2, 3*. The Study on Precise and Quantitative Measurement of Flame OHConcentration by CRDS-CARS-PLIF Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3955-3962. |
[4] |
WANG Wen-song1, PEI Chen-xi2, YANG Bin1*, WANG Zhi-xin2, QIANG Ke-jie2, WANG Ying1. Flame Temperature and Emissivity Distribution Measurement MethodBased on Multispectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3644-3652. |
[5] |
TIAN Fu-chao1, CHEN Lei2*, PEI Huan2, BAI Jie-qi1, ZENG Wen2. Diagnosis of Emission Spectroscopy of Helium, Methane and Air Plasma Jets at Atmospheric Pressure[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2694-2698. |
[6] |
JIN Hua-wei1, 2, 3, WANG Hao-wei1, 2, LUO Ping1, 2, FANG Lei1, 2. Simulation Design and Performance Analysis of Two-Stage Buffer
Photoacoustic Cell[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2375-2380. |
[7] |
LIANG Wen-ke, WEI Guang-fen, WANG Ming-hao. Research on Methane Detection Error Caused by Lorentzian Profile Approximation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1683-1689. |
[8] |
LIU Mei-jun, TIAN Ning*, YU Ji*. Spectral Study on Mouse Oocyte Quality[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1376-1380. |
[9] |
ZHANG Li-fang1, YANG Yan-xia1, ZHAO Guan-jia1, MA Su-xia1, GUO Xue-mao2. Comparison of Numerical Iterative Algorithms for Two-Dimensional Absorption Spectral Reconstruction[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1367-1375. |
[10] |
LIU Hong-yuan1, WU Bin1, 2, JIANG Tao3, YANG Yan-zhao1, WANG Hong-chao1, LI Jing-song1. Study on the Measurement of Absolute Spectral Responsivity of Terahertz Detector[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1017-1022. |
[11] |
ZHANG Xuan1, ZENG Chao-bin1, LIU Xian-ya1, CHEN Ping1, 2, 3*, HAN Yan2, 3. Multi-Spectral Temperature Measurement Method Based on Multivariate Extreme Value Optimization[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 705-711. |
[12] |
SU Yun-peng, HE Chun-jing, LI Ang-ze, XU Ke-mi, QIU Li-rong, CUI Han*. Ore Classification and Recognition Based on Confocal LIBS Combined With Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 692-697. |
[13] |
PENG Wei, YANG Sheng-wei, HE Tian-bo, YU Ben-li, LI Jin-song, CHENG Zhen-biao, ZHOU Sheng*, JIANG Tong-tong*. Detection of Water Vapor Concentration in Sealed Medicine Bottles Based on Digital Quadrature Phase-Locked Demodulation Algorithm and TDLAS
Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 698-704. |
[14] |
SI Gan-shang1, 2, LIU Jia-xiang1, LI Zhen-gang1, 2, NING Zhi-qiang1, 2, FANG Yong-hua1, 2*, CHENG Zhen1, 2, SI Bei-bei1, 2, YANG Chang-ping1, 2. Raman Signal Enhancement for Liquid Detection Using a New Sample Cell[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 712-717. |
[15] |
LI Qing-jun, SHEN Yan, MENG Qing-hao, WANG Guo-yang, YE Ping, SU Bo*, ZHANG Cun-lin. Terahertz Absorption Characteristics of Potassium Salt Solution Based on Microfluidic Chip[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 363-367. |
|
|
|
|