|
|
|
|
|
|
The Space-Borne Lidar Cloud and Aerosol Classification Algorithms |
LI Ming-yang1,2, FAN Meng1*, TAO Jin-hua1, SU Lin1, WU Tong1,3, CHEN Liang-fu1, ZHANG Zi-li4 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Jointly Sponsored by Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100101, China
2. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266510, China
4. Zhejiang Environment Monitoring Centre, Hangzhou 310007, China |
|
|
Abstract LIDAR plays significant roles in monitoring the vertical distribution characteristics of clouds and aerosols and studying their impacts on the global climate change. For the space-born LIDAR, discrimination between clouds and aerosol is the first step of cloud/aerosol vertically optical property retrieve, and to a great extent, the retrieval precision depends on the accuracy of cloud and aerosol classification algorithm. Based on the optical and geographic characteristics of aerosols and clouds observed by LIDAR, in this study, the CALIOP aerosol and cloud products over China in the year of 2016 were trained as the sample sets. An effective cloud/aerosol classification algorithm was developed by combining the support vector machines (SVM) and decision tree methods. Our algorithm includes 3 parts: cloud and aerosol discrimination, ice-water cloud classification and aerosol subtype classification. (1) The cloud and aerosol were discriminated by the classification confidence functionsof 5-D probability density function (PDF) with parameters of γ532,χ,δ,Z and lat. (2) Randomly oriented ice (ROI) and water cloud were classified based onthe SVM. And by constructing the PDFs with γ532, χ, δ, Z and T, feature layers misclassified by SVM were corrected, and a small portion of the horizontally oriented ice (HOI) clouds were removed from the water clouds. (3) Based on the optical and geographic characteristics of aerosol subtypes, decision tree classification was used for the determination of aerosol subtypes. Our retrieval results showed a good agreement with the CALIOP VFM products. For the cloud and aerosol discrimination results, the consistency ratios between our retrieves and VFM products for aerosol and cloud are up to 98.51% and 88.43%, respectively. And the consistency ratios in the day are higher than those at night. For the cloud phase retrieval results, water clouds can be well separated, and the consistency ratio of water cloud between our retrieves and VFM products is as high as 93.44%. The consistency ratio of HOI is low due largely to the confusion between HOI and ROI. For the aerosol subtype classification, most aerosol subtypes could be well recognized by our algorithm. However, the consistency ratios of the mixed subtypes (e. g. polluted continental and polluted dust) between retrieval results and VFM products are relatively lower. Moreover, the cloud/aerosol, cloud phase and aerosol subtype classifications were also compared with the VFM products under three typical air conditions, i. e. haze, dust and clean. Under the haze condition, our results for most of the smoke aerosols agree quite well with the corresponding results from VFM. Under the duststorm condition, our algorithm can effectively discriminate the most of dust and polluted dust aerosols. For the clear day, our results for the few existing cloud and aerosol layers are quite consistent with the VFM results. This paper is an important improvement of the cloud and aerosol classification algorithms, which can simplify the processing and improve efficiency with satis factory accuracy. In the future work, we will build day/night and seasonal training sample sets, and consider more ice cloud phases and aerosol properties in the cloud/aerosol classification retrieval algorithm.
|
Received: 2017-12-12
Accepted: 2018-04-23
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
FAN Meng
E-mail: fanmeng@radi.ac.cn
|
|
[1] Cuesta J, Flamant J P H. Applied Optics, 2010,49(12): 2232.
[2] Pandit A K, Gadhavi H S, Ratnam M V, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2015,15(24): 13833.
[3] Khaykin S M, Godin-Beekmann S, Keckhut P, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2017,17(3): 1829.
[4] Sugimoto N, Nishizawa T, Shimizu A, et al. AEROSOL Classification Retrieval Algorithms for Earth CARE/ATLID, CALIPSO/CALIOP, and Ground-Based Lidars. in Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 2011.
[5] Illingworth A J, Barker H W, Beljaars A, et al., Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2015,31(1): 197.
[6] Chen B, Minnis P, Hu Y, et al. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2010,10:4241.
[7] Liu Z Y, Vaughan M, Winker D, et al. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2009,26(7): 1198.
[8] Ma Y Y,Gong Y W. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2012,5(6): 1849.
[9] Naeger A R, Christopher S A, Ferrare R, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013,51(1): 642.
[10] Hu Y X, Winker D, Vaughan M, et al. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2009,26(11): 2293.
[11] Burton S P, Ferrare R A, Vaughan M A, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2013,6(5): 1397. |
[1] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[2] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[3] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
[4] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[5] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[6] |
LI Wen-wen1, 2, LONG Chang-jiang1, 2, 4*, LI Shan-jun1, 2, 3, 4, CHEN Hong1, 2, 4. Detection of Mixed Pesticide Residues of Prochloraz and Imazalil in
Citrus Epidermis by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3052-3058. |
[7] |
LIU Fei1, TAN Jia-jin1*, XIE Gu-ai2, SU Jun3, YE Jian-ren1. Early Diagnosis of Pine Wilt Disease Based on Hyperspectral Data and Needle Resistivity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3280-3285. |
[8] |
MA Qian1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Research on Classification of Heavy Metal Pb in Honeysuckle Based on XRF and Transfer Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2729-2733. |
[9] |
LÜ Shi-lei1, 2, 3, WANG Hong-wei1, LI Zhen1, 2, 3*, ZHOU Xu1, ZHAO Jing1. Hyperspectral Identification Model of Cantonese Tangerine Peel Based on BWO-SVM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2894-2901. |
[10] |
WANG Jun-jie1, YUAN Xi-ping2, 3, GAN Shu1, 2*, HU Lin1, ZHAO Hai-long1. Hyperspectral Identification Method of Typical Sedimentary Rocks in Lufeng Dinosaur Valley[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2855-2861. |
[11] |
ZHANG Hai-liang1, XIE Chao-yong1, TIAN Peng1, ZHAN Bai-shao1, CHEN Zai-liang1, LUO Wei1*, LIU Xue-mei2*. Measurement of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Data-Driven Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2226-2231. |
[12] |
LI Hao-dong1, 2, LI Ju-zi1*, CHEN Yan-lin1, HUANG Yu-jing1, Andy Hsitien Shen1*. Establishing Support Vector Machine SVM Recognition Model to Identify Jadeite Origin[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2252-2257. |
[13] |
LI Bin, HAN Zhao-yang, WANG Qiu, SUN Zhao-xiang, LIU Yan-de*. Research on Bruise Level Detection of Loquat Based on Hyperspectral
Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1792-1799. |
[14] |
GUO Feng1, ZHAO Dong-e1*, YANG Xue-feng1, CHU Wen-bo2, ZHANG Bin1, ZHANG Da-shun3MENG Fan-jun3. Research on Hyperspectral Image Recognition of Iron Fragments[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 997-1003. |
[15] |
PAN Zhao-jie1, SUN Gen-yun1, 2*, ZHANG Ai-zhu1, FU Hang1, WANG Xin-wei3, REN Guang-wei3. Tobacco Disease Detection Model Based on Band Selection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1023-1029. |
|
|
|
|