|
|
|
|
|
|
Tensor-Based Dictionary Learning Sparse Representation Classification for Hyperspectral Image |
GONG Xue-liang, LI Yu*, JIA Shu-han, ZHAO Quan-hua, WANG Li-ying |
School of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China
|
|
|
Abstract Hyperspectral images (HSI) have been widely used in various fields of production and life due to their rich spectral and spatial information. This paper proposes a tensor dictionary learning-based sparse representation classification (Tensor-DLSRC) algorithm, which directly takes the spatial-spectral tensor as the basic unit to exploit the spectral and spatial information and improve the accuracy of hyperspectral image classification. Firstly, the spatial-spectral tensor comprises the spectral vectors of all pixels in the spatial neighborhood of the central pixels. Secondly, the mean vectors of each order fiber of the training spatial-spectral tensor are used as dictionary atoms to generate an initialized dictionary. The tensor-based dictionary learning (TDL) algorithm is proposed to train a set of structured dictionaries from the training samples. Then, a tensor-based sparse representation model is constructed based on the sparsity constraints of the tensor, and the sparse representation coefficient tensor corresponding to the test spatial-spectral tensor is obtained by solving the model. Finally, the class of the test sample is determined according to the minimization of the reconstruction residuals. To analyze the impact of parameters on the classification accuracy of the proposed algorithm, a series of experiments were conducted to discuss the effects of parameters such as training sample size M, neighborhood window size (2δ+1)×(2δ+1), sparsity μ1 in dictionary learning stage, and sparsity μ2 in sparse representation stage on overall accuracy (OA) before conducting classification comparison experiments. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, a series of experiments were conducted on three HSIs, (e.g., Indian Pines, Salinas, and Xuzhou) to compare and analyze the classification results of our algorithm with five comparative algorithms: SRC and DLSRC algorithms based on spectral vectors, JSRC and DLSJSC algorithms with added neighborhood spatial information, and Tensor DLSRC algorithm based on spatial-spectral tensor. The classification results were quantitatively analyzed using Average Precision Rate (APR), Average Accuracy (PA), OA, and Kappa coefficients based on the confusion matrix. The proposed Tensor-DLSRC algorithm has the highest average level of OA and Kappa coefficients among the six algorithms. It has the smallest standard deviation, indicating that compared with the comparative algorithms, this algorithm can provide more accurate and stable classification results.
|
Received: 2024-10-10
Accepted: 2024-12-10
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Yu
E-mail: liyu@lntu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] ZHANG Bing(张 兵). National Remote Sensing Bulletin(遥感学报), 2016,20(5): 1062.
[2] ZHANG Yan, HUA Wen-shen, HUANG Fu-yu, et al(张 炎, 华文深, 黄富瑜, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2020, 40(6): 1902.
[3] Wan Y T, Hu X, Zhong Y F, et al. Tailings Reservoir Disaster and Environmental Monitoring Using the UAV-Ground Hyperspectral Joing Observation and Processing: A Case of Study in Xinjiang, the Belt and Road, IGARSS 2019—2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.
[4] ZHANG Li-fu, WANG Sa, ZHANG Yan, et al(张立福, 王 飒, 张 燕,等). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica(测绘学报), 2023, 52(7): 1126.
[5] An G Q, Xing M F, He B B, et al. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(18): 3104.
[6] Ke C. Military Object Detection Using Multiple Information Extracted From Hyperspectral Imagery, 2017 International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing (PIC), Nanjing, China, 2017, 124.
[7] Zhang Y Q, Cao G, Wang B S, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5500517.
[8] ZUO Xi-bing, LIU Bing, YU Xu-chu, et al(左溪冰, 刘 冰, 余旭初,等). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica(测绘学报), 2021, 50(10): 1358.
[9] Yu H Y, Gao L R, Liao W Z, et al. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2017, 14(11): 2142.
[10] Melgani F, Bruzzone Lorenzo. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2004, 42(8): 1778.
[11] Camps-Valls G, Bruzzone L. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005, 43(6): 1351.
[12] Zhao C H, Gao B, Zhang L J, et al. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2018, 95: 61.
[13] Chen Y S, Jiang H L, Li C Y, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(10): 6232.
[14] Sellami A, Tabbone S. Pattern Recognition, 2022, 121: 108224.
[15] ZHANG Liang-pei, LI Jia-yi(张良培, 李家艺). National Remote Sensing Bulletin(遥感学报), 2016, 20(5): 1091.
[16] Chen Y, Nasrabadi N M, Tran T D. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(10): 3973.
[17] Chen Y, Nasrabadi N M, Tran T D. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(1): 217.
[18] Zhao Q H, Jia S H, Li Y. Pattern Recognition, 2021, 111(2): 107635.
[19] GAO Xiao-jie, JIAN Ji, DAI Xiao-ai, et al(高孝杰, 简 季, 戴晓爱, 等). Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University[武汉大学学报(信息科学版)], 2016, 41(3): 408.
[20] LI Yu, LI Yi-ran, WANG Guang-hui, et al(李 玉, 李奕燃, 王光辉,等). Journal of Geo-information Science(地球信息科学学报), 2020, 22(8): 1642.
[21] TAN Xiong, YU Xu-chu, QIN Jin-chun, et al(谭 熊, 余旭初, 秦进春,等). Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument(仪器仪表学报), 2014, 35(2): 405.
[22] DU Pei-jun, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Peng, et al(杜培军, 张 伟, 张 鹏,等). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica(测绘学报), 2023, 52(7): 1090.
[23] HUANG Hong, CHEN Mei-li, WANG Li-hua, et al(黄 鸿, 陈美利, 王丽华,等). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica(测绘学报), 2019, 48(6): 676.
[24] Ghamisi P, Maggiori E, Li S, et al. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2018, 6(3): 10.
[25] Zhang A Z, Pan Z J, Fu H, et al. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(9): 2125.
[26] Zhang H Y, Li J T, Huang Y C, et al. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2014, 7(6): 2057.
[27] Gan L, Xia J S, Du P J, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(9): 5343.
[28] Sidiropoulos N D, Lathauwer L D, Fu X, et al. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2017, 65(13): 3351.
|
[1] |
ZHU Rong1, ZHENG Wan-bo1, 2, 3*, WANG Yao2, 3, TAN Chun-lin2, 3. Improved Fusion Algorithm for Infrared and Visible Images Based on
Image Enhancement and Convolutional Sparse Representation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(02): 558-568. |
[2] |
XU Jing-yu1, BAO Ni-sha1, 2*, LANG Jie-shuang3, LIU Shan-jun1, 2, MAO Ya-chun1, 2, HE Li-ming1, 2. A Hyperspectral Recognition Method for Camouflaged Targets Based on Background Dictionary Sparse Representation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(12): 3534-3542. |
[3] |
CAO Wang1, MAO Ya-chun1*, WEN Jie1, DING Rui-bo1, XU Meng-yuan1, FU Yan-hua2. Study on Inversion Method of Anshan-Type Iron Ore Grade Based on
Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(12): 3494-3503. |
[4] |
LIU Yu-juan1, 2, 3, LIU Yan-da1, 2, 3, YAN Zhen1, 4, ZHANG Zhi-yong1, 2, 3, CAO Yi-ming1, 2, 3, SONG Ying1, 2, 3*. Classification of Hybrid Convolution Hyperspectral Images Based on
Attention Mechanism[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(10): 2916-2922. |
[5] |
WEI Yun-peng1, HU Hui-qiang1, MAO Xiao-bo1*, ZHAO Yu-ping2*, ZHANG Lei3, SHENG Wen-tao4. Identification for Different Growth Years of Plastrum Testudinis via Hyperspectral Imaging Technique and Heterogeneous Ensemble Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(09): 2613-2619. |
[6] |
JI Jing-yu, ZHANG Yu-hua, XING Na, WANG Chang-long, LIN Zhi-long*, YAO Jiang-yi. Three-Scale Deconstruction and Sparse Representation of Infrared and Visible Image Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(05): 1425-1438. |
[7] |
LI Hui1, LIU Xu-sheng2, JIANG Jin-bao3*, CHEN Xu-hui4, ZHANG Shuai5, TANG Ke1, ZHAO Xin-wei1, DU Xing-qiang1, YU LONG Fei-xue1. Extraction of Natural Gas Microleakage Stress Regions Based on Hyperspectral Images of Winter Wheat[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(03): 770-776. |
[8] |
WANG Juan1, 2, 3, ZHANG Ai-wu1, 2, 3*, ZHANG Xi-zhen1, 2, 3, CHEN Yun-sheng1, 2, 3. Residual Quantization of Radiation Depth in Hyperspectral Image and Its Influence on Terrain Classification[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(03): 872-882. |
[9] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[10] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[11] |
ZHANG Fu1, 2, WANG Xin-yue1, CUI Xia-hua1, YU Huang1, CAO Wei-hua1, ZHANG Ya-kun1, XIONG Ying3, FU San-ling4*. Identification of Maize Varieties by Hyperspectral Combined With Extreme Learning Machine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2928-2934. |
[12] |
TANG Ting, PAN Xin*, LUO Xiao-ling, GAO Xiao-jing. Fusion of ConvLSTM and Multi-Attention Mechanism Network for
Hyperspectral Image Classification[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2608-2616. |
[13] |
LIANG Wan-jie1, FENG Hui2, JIANG Dong3, ZHANG Wen-yu1, 4, CAO Jing1, CAO Hong-xin1*. Early Recognition of Sclerotinia Stem Rot on Oilseed Rape by Hyperspectral Imaging Combined With Deep Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2220-2225. |
[14] |
WANG Guang-lai, WANG En-feng, WANG Cong-cong, LIU Da-yang*. Early Bruise Detection of Crystal Pear Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology and Transfer Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3626-3630. |
[15] |
XIANG Song-yang1, 3, XU Zhang-hua1, 2, 4, 5, 6*, ZHANG Yi-wei1, 2, ZHANG Qi1, 3, ZHOU Xin1, 2, YU Hui1, 3, LI Bin1, 2, LI Yi-fan1, 2. Construction and Application of ReliefF-RFE Feature Selection Algorithm for Hyperspectral Image Classification[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3283-3290. |
|
|
|
|