|
|
|
|
|
|
An X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy Pretreatment Method for Detection of Heavy Metal Content in Soil |
REN Dong1,2, SHEN Jun1,2, REN Shun1,2*, WANG Ji-hua1,2,3, LU An-xiang3 |
1. College of Computer and Information Technology, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
2. Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center for Farmland Environmental Monitoring, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
3. Beijing Research Center for Agricultural Standards and Testing, Beijing 100097, China |
|
|
Abstract Heavy metal pollution in the soil affects the yield and quality of crops. The traditional detection method has complicated procedures, high detection costs, and slow detection speed. The X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis technology to detect heavy metal content in soil has the advantages of being simple in processing, on-site, rapid and non-destructive. Due to the complex soil background including much noise and irrelevant information, before the establishment of the XRF correction model, the pre-processing of the spectrum can effectively remove irrelevant information and maintain useful information, which has an important influence on the accuracy of the XRF prediction model.This article focuses on the effects of spectral pre-processing method on the accuracy of heavy metal content prediction model. Firstly, forward interval partial least squares (FiPLS) was taken as a correction model to compare the detection accuracy of the heavy metal model in eight different conditions, namely non-pre-processing, detrending processing (DT), standard normal variable transformation (SNV), multiple scatter correction (MSC), wavelet denoising (WT), SNV+DT, convolution smoothing (SG) + first derivative and convolution smoothing (SG) + second derivative. The preliminary results showed that the multiple scatter correction pre-treatment method had desirable effects. Compared with the original spectrum, the determination coefficient R rised from the original 0.988 to 0.990, and the prediction of root mean square error (RMSEP) and the relative error respectively declined from the original 20.809 and 0.166 to 19.051 and 0.121. Secondly, on the basis of the multi-dimensional scattering correction pre-processing method, the localized weighted linear regression multiple scatter correction (LWLRMSC) and partial least squares multivariate scatter correction (PLSMSC) were proposed in terms of the restriction of describing non-linear relationships with linear representations, and the modeling effects of LWLRMSC and PLSMSC were compared. LWLRMSC was based on the weighted idea. In the prediction of the value of a point, the proper kernel function and weight distribution strategy were selected to perform linear regression of the prediction point, and the under-fitting condition of the simple linear regression was resolved. PLSMSC, based on the PLS modeling idea and taking into account the maximum correlation between the independent variable and the dependent variable, reduced the fitting error and distortion. The results showed that PLSMSC has the best pre-treatment effects. The R values of the predicted and actual values of the five heavy metals (Cu, Zn, As, Pb and Cr) were 0.989, 0.973, 0.991, 0.989 and 0.986, with the RMSEP respectively being 8.805, 58.360, 7.671, 12.549 and 20.851. Compared with the traditional MSC method, PLSMSC not only has a significant improvement in accuracy but also has better generalization performance. It can eliminate spectral noise and improve the contribution of effective information, thus providing theoretical support for the soil heavy metal content model to select the suitable pre-treatment method.
|
Received: 2018-02-13
Accepted: 2018-06-29
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
REN Shun
E-mail: renshun_ctgu@qq.com
|
|
[1] WANG Shi-fang, HAN Ping, LU An-xiang, et al(王世芳, 韩 平, 陆安祥, 等). Journal of Food Safety and Quality(食品安全质量检测学报), 2016, 7(11): 4394.
[2] Weindorf D C, Bakr N, Zhu Y D. Advances in Agronomy, 2014, 128: 1.
[3] Qu F, Ren D. Sensors, 2016, 16(1): 89.
[4] Wang C, Pan X. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2016, 80(5): 1393.
[5] Zheng Kaiyi, Zhang Xuan, Tong Peijin,et al. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2015, 26(3): 293.
[6] Chen Tianbing, Liu Muhua, Huang Lin, et al. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2016, 44(7): 1029.
[7] QU Fang-fang, REN Dong(瞿芳芳,任 东). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2016, 36(2): 593.
[8] Ministry of Environmental Protecting of the People’s Republic of China(中华人民共和国环境保护部), GB 15618—1995, Environmental Quality Standard for Soil(国家标准 15618—1995: 土壤环境质量标准). Beijing: Standards Press of China(北京:中国标准出版社), 1995. 1.
[9] Dhanoa M S, Barnes R J, Lister S J. Applied Spectroscopy,1989, 43(5): 772.
[10] Losada P P, Lozano J S, Rodríguez V G, et al. Vibrational Spectroscopy,1993, 5(2): 245.
[11] Savitzky A, Golay M J E. Analytical Chemistry,1964, 36(8): 1627.
[12] Park K S, Ko Y H, Lee H, et al. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst.,2001, 55(1-2): 53.
[13] Isaksson T, Ns T. Applied Spectroscopy,1988, 42(7): 1273. |
[1] |
LI Jie, ZHOU Qu*, JIA Lu-fen, CUI Xiao-sen. Comparative Study on Detection Methods of Furfural in Transformer Oil Based on IR and Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 125-133. |
[2] |
LI Xin-ting, ZHANG Feng, FENG Jie*. Convolutional Neural Network Combined With Improved Spectral
Processing Method for Potato Disease Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 215-224. |
[3] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[4] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[5] |
CHEN Jia-wei1, 2, ZHOU De-qiang1, 2*, CUI Chen-hao3, REN Zhi-jun1, ZUO Wen-juan1. Prediction Model of Farinograph Characteristics of Wheat Flour Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3089-3097. |
[6] |
WU Yong-qing1, 2, TANG Na1, HUANG Lu-yao1, CUI Yu-tong1, ZHANG Bo1, GUO Bo-li1, ZHANG Ying-quan1*. Model Construction for Detecting Water Absorption in Wheat Flour Using Vis-NIR Spectroscopy and Combined With Multivariate Statistical #br#
Analyses[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2825-2831. |
[7] |
LIU Rui-min, YIN Yong*, YU Hui-chun, YUAN Yun-xia. Extraction of 3D Fluorescence Feature Information Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis Coupled With Wavelet Packet Energy for Monitoring Quality Change of Cucumber During Storage[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2967-2973. |
[8] |
PU Shan-shan, ZHENG En-rang*, CHEN Bei. Research on A Classification Algorithm of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2446-2451. |
[9] |
JIN Cheng-liang1, WANG Yong-jun2*, HUANG He2, LIU Jun-min3. Application of High-Dimensional Infrared Spectral Data Preprocessing in the Origin Identification of Traditional Chinese Medicinal Materials[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2238-2245. |
[10] |
ZHANG Hai-liang1, XIE Chao-yong1, TIAN Peng1, ZHAN Bai-shao1, CHEN Zai-liang1, LUO Wei1*, LIU Xue-mei2*. Measurement of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Data-Driven Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2226-2231. |
[11] |
LI Hao-dong1, 2, LI Ju-zi1*, CHEN Yan-lin1, HUANG Yu-jing1, Andy Hsitien Shen1*. Establishing Support Vector Machine SVM Recognition Model to Identify Jadeite Origin[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2252-2257. |
[12] |
LIU Yu-juan1, 2, 3 , LIU Yan-da1, 2, 3, SONG Ying1, 2, 3*, ZHU Yang1, 2, 3, MENG Zhao-ling1, 2, 3. Near Infrared Spectroscopic Quantitative Detection and Analysis Method of Methanol Gasoline[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1489-1494. |
[13] |
FU Wan-lu1, 2, LU Hao3*, CHAI Jun4, SUN Zuo-yu1. Spectroscopic Characteristics of Longxi Nephrite From Sichuan and Its Color Genesis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1408-1412. |
[14] |
HU Zheng1, ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Effect of Dimensionality Reduction and Noise Reduction on Hyperspectral Recognition During Incubation Period of Tomato Early Blight[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 744-752. |
[15] |
YUAN Liang-jing1, JIA Yun-hai1, 2, CHENG Da-wei1, 2*. Study on Methods of Detection Limit in XRF Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 412-418. |
|
|
|
|